Looking at the version number 6.03, I venture to think it's the identical as the one beta tested.

Having done a few on the UD agent, they appear to be equal or faster, but it's always possible that a new test series was started.

The few I have in queue carries 4000+4015 as batch numbers. Can't check though what experiment this is as the Scripps/Olson/FA@H site is timing out again.

Anyway, tomorrow morning check into the project stats page to see what the averages are for Yesterday. Usually on a restart will the fast machines deliver first so the initial average run time per job will creep up for the next week. As reference, the April 22 average was 7.12 hours per FA@H job.

AND, long as the credits per hour remain in ballpark with the old release, one simply has to say: They're tougher.

ears to the ground and eye open

[Edit: The FightAIDS"Home site was just updated: 4000-4069 belong to experiment 19 and 4070-4201 to experiment 19a]

DM,

[service message] A matter of improved readability of a support thread, lest there is some fear of someone hotwiring posts: You don't need to quote a post if yours are following right below.... hitting the reply button works as well and help to reduce the ache from thumbing my mouse wheel on these fora[/service message]

Now on topic: Whoa Nelly: This 4015 did 4.4% in 38 minutes....extrapolated it will be 14.4 hours.... hope its speeds up or will be needing some supercooled CPU power to eat through these (mitigating... its on my crawler quad using Redmond OS of the far viewing type).

I would suggest you put a bandage on the finger, Sek.

Speaking of fingers, until they get this sorted, the easiest solution for me was to opt out of the project, kill the 32 queued and running WU's (someone else can have the pleasure of doing them) and move on to other projects.