Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 33
|
![]() |
Author |
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3715 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I see my system completed a WU in 0.93 hours while my wingman took 2.98 hours. Is this unusual or can the processing in some instances have that much of a difference? If the Thinkpad were your wingman's and you had a very fast overclocked desktop that would not be unusual, but it's not your case.Anyway I don't think we currently have crunchers around which can complete a DDDT2 pr WU in 0.93 hour, so your WU will most probably end as Invalid. Anything strange in its Result Log? |
||
|
KerSamson
Master Cruncher Switzerland Joined: Jan 29, 2007 Post Count: 1672 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hello,
----------------------------------------The once error (of 809 WUs), I did experienced with DDDT2 was "ts05_f004_pr78b1" with the following statement: <core_client_version>5.10.45</core_client_version> Cheers, Yves |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Hi KerSamson,
----------------------------------------It's this line I think: CHARGE OUTSIDE INNER GSBP REGION The model goes out of bounds for some target compounds, fortunately on only a very small number of tasks. The techs capture that from the periodic production reports that summarize all task fails and address them if significant numbers appear. Thanks for reporting.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
KerSamson
Master Cruncher Switzerland Joined: Jan 29, 2007 Post Count: 1672 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Sekerob,
----------------------------------------Thanks for replying. I mentioned this unique failure I experienced with DDDT2 because I was surprised by the thread title "lot of computation errors". Generally, I experience computation errors very rarely (perhaps 1 per month, or less). Have a good time, Yves |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
...Anyway I don't think we currently have crunchers around which can complete a DDDT2 pr WU in 0.93 hour, so your WU will most probably end as Invalid. Anything strange in its Result Log? Hi Jean, The result log follows and it doesn't look like anything was done. Unfortunately I don't have any other DDDT2 WUs still around that I can use to compare with. It looks like BOINC tried to restart the WU but it couldn't find anything to restore the state. Thanks Result Log Result Name: ts05_ e476_ pr67a0_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.10.56</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Note - I found other work units for DDDT2 which are PV, and the Result Log is the same as what I copied above. The only difference is the CPU time is approximately 1.2 hours instead of 0.93.
|
||
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3715 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. dkt,This line is normal. The application always checks if some work has already been done, and for a new WU that's what it says. Your log looks perfectly normal. Has this job been validated now? |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Has this job been validated now? No. As a matter of fact, there are two other executions that are also Inconclusive. Let me copy the status page below so you can see if there is anything that is interesting.
----------------------------------------Workunit Status Project Name: Discovering Dengue Drugs - Together - Phase 2 Created: 8/20/10 Name: ts05_e476_pr67a0 Minimum Quorum: 2 Replication: 4 Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit ts05_ e476_ pr67a0_ 3-- - In Progress 8/28/10 14:47:16 9/1/10 14:47:16 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 ts05_ e476_ pr67a0_ 2-- 617 Inconclusive 8/26/10 09:38:03 8/28/10 14:44:38 1.20 21.9 / 0.0 ts05_ e476_ pr67a0_ 1-- 617 Inconclusive 8/22/10 06:12:35 8/25/10 16:19:01 0.93 14.2 / 0.0 ts05_ e476_ pr67a0_ 0-- 617 Inconclusive 8/22/10 06:12:34 8/26/10 04:14:31 2.98 76.3 / 0.0 Edited to put CPU time in red. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Aug 29, 2010 5:39:37 PM] |
||
|
JmBoullier
Former Community Advisor Normandy - France Joined: Jan 26, 2007 Post Count: 3715 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This WU does not smell good.
----------------------------------------From the CPU times It seems that it never completes correctly, and still it produces no error message in its log. ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
This WU does not smell good. From the CPU times It seems that it never completes correctly, and still it produces no error message in its log. ![]() Hi Jean, I just wanted to let you know I checked the WU and it has been marked valid. ts05_ e476_ pr67a0_ 1-- DKT-0529E4878D Valid 8/22/10 06:12:35 8/25/10 16:19:01 0.93 14.2 / 14.7 I don't know if you did anything, but if you did, thanks. |
||
|
|
![]() |