Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 3
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3680 times and has 2 replies Next Thread
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
Post Count: 1027
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
odd result from wingman; includes RC = 0x100

Here are results from me and my wingman:

E200617_ 918_ A.26.C18H8N2S5Se.56.4.set1d06_ 1-- 637 Valid 11/24/10 06:40:06 11/25/10 13:33:47 0.03 1.1 / 12.4
E200617_ 918_ A.26.C18H8N2S5Se.56.4.set1d06_ 0-- 637 Valid 11/24/10 06:29:05 11/25/10 20:21:30 6.94 189.3 / 99.2 <- me

And here is part of the wingman's result log:

Result Name: E200617_ 918_ A.26.C18H8N2S5Se.56.4.set1d06_ 1--

<core_client_version>6.10.17</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning.
[08:31:16] Number of jobs = 16
[08:31:16] Starting job 0,CPU time has been restored to 0.000000.
[08:31:16] Starting new Job
[08:31:16] Qink name = fldman
[08:31:16] Qink name = gesman
[08:31:16] Qink name = scfman
[08:32:58] Qink name = anlman
[08:32:59] End of Job
[08:33:01] Finished Job #0
[08:33:01] Starting job 1,CPU time has been restored to 94.360000.
[08:33:01] Starting new Job
[08:33:01] Qink name = fldman
[08:33:01] Qink name = gesman
[08:33:01] Qink name = scfman
Error writing to TMP file 181/0 (1870848): No space left on device
Application exited with RC = 0x100
[08:33:11] Finished Job #1
[08:33:11] Starting job 2,CPU time has been restored to 103.590000.
[08:33:11] Skipping Job #2
[08:33:11] Starting job 3,CPU time has been restored to 103.590000.
[08:33:11] Skipping Job #3
.
.
.

08:33:11] Starting job 15,CPU time has been restored to 103.590000.
[08:33:11] Skipping Job #15
08:33:11 (2570): called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>

So "no space left on device" seems to have triggered this instance of RC = 0 x 100.

And this is another example of wierd points allotment in CEP2.
----------------------------------------

[Nov 26, 2010 3:37:57 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb009761
Master Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 2983
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: odd result from wingman; includes RC = 0x100

Yes, I've seen the odd strange points allocation in CEP2 as well... At least we know that Harvard are taking both results and working with the one which provides the most info
----------------------------------------

[Nov 26, 2010 3:57:57 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 23, 2010
Post Count: 1027
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: odd result from wingman; includes RC = 0x100

At least we know that Harvard are taking both results and working with the one which provides the most info


I feel a little less reassured on that score when, in this example, .03 hours of computing on my wingman's part was considered enough to validate my result. confused
----------------------------------------

[Nov 26, 2010 1:25:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread