Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3
|
![]() |
Author |
|
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 23, 2010 Post Count: 1027 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here are results from me and my wingman:
----------------------------------------E200617_ 918_ A.26.C18H8N2S5Se.56.4.set1d06_ 1-- 637 Valid 11/24/10 06:40:06 11/25/10 13:33:47 0.03 1.1 / 12.4 E200617_ 918_ A.26.C18H8N2S5Se.56.4.set1d06_ 0-- 637 Valid 11/24/10 06:29:05 11/25/10 20:21:30 6.94 189.3 / 99.2 <- me And here is part of the wingman's result log: Result Name: E200617_ 918_ A.26.C18H8N2S5Se.56.4.set1d06_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.10.17</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <stderr_txt> INFO: No state to restore. Start from the beginning. [08:31:16] Number of jobs = 16 [08:31:16] Starting job 0,CPU time has been restored to 0.000000. [08:31:16] Starting new Job [08:31:16] Qink name = fldman [08:31:16] Qink name = gesman [08:31:16] Qink name = scfman [08:32:58] Qink name = anlman [08:32:59] End of Job [08:33:01] Finished Job #0 [08:33:01] Starting job 1,CPU time has been restored to 94.360000. [08:33:01] Starting new Job [08:33:01] Qink name = fldman [08:33:01] Qink name = gesman [08:33:01] Qink name = scfman Error writing to TMP file 181/0 (1870848): No space left on device Application exited with RC = 0x100 [08:33:11] Finished Job #1 [08:33:11] Starting job 2,CPU time has been restored to 103.590000. [08:33:11] Skipping Job #2 [08:33:11] Starting job 3,CPU time has been restored to 103.590000. [08:33:11] Skipping Job #3 . . . 08:33:11] Starting job 15,CPU time has been restored to 103.590000. [08:33:11] Skipping Job #15 08:33:11 (2570): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]> So "no space left on device" seems to have triggered this instance of RC = 0 x 100. And this is another example of wierd points allotment in CEP2. ![]() |
||
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 2983 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yes, I've seen the odd strange points allocation in CEP2 as well... At least we know that Harvard are taking both results and working with the one which provides the most info
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
kateiacy
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 23, 2010 Post Count: 1027 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
At least we know that Harvard are taking both results and working with the one which provides the most info I feel a little less reassured on that score when, in this example, .03 hours of computing on my wingman's part was considered enough to validate my result. ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |