Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 490
Posts: 490   Pages: 49   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 40166 times and has 489 replies Next Thread
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18665
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: smilesmile Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 60 smilesmile

IIRC, I did this once before a good while back. I would expect that the specific numbers will differ for everyone depending on their mix of machines and distribution of tasks across those machines but the trend still remains the same. I took my total run time for each project, converted to total seconds and divided that into my total points for that project to get points per second and then converted back to points per hour so the differences were more discernable. Here's what I got:

CFSW 148.15
SN2S 138.59
GFAM 132.93
DSFL 128.12
C4CW 133.38
CEP2 117.03
DDDT2 127.19
HCMD2 122.43
HFCC 120.90
HCC 104.81
HPF2 94.51
FAAH 84.65

I ordered these by the project start dates taken from the Research section of the website but the start dates don't necessarily reflect the order WCG started working on the projects. I would think that since machines have gotten more powerful over time, that would be why the number have gone upbut I've had a rather stable mix of machines. In fact, I went down from 2 C2Ds and a quad to one C2D and a quad in early-to-mid 09 but my points per hour didn't drop until projects that started about a year later. To me, it says that, all else being equal, you get more points for the same computing effort on the newest projects. Yes, getting more powerful machines should bump the numbers even higher but even then, it would seem you'd want to focus on the latest project if you want to focus on maximizing the points you get for the same computing effort. Now there's plenty of reasons for crunching on specific projects besides this but it would seem to generalize out to focusing on projects in order as they come out. Still, I don't have any data to look at where machines are regularly replaced with the latest and greatest for example so the differences there could be far greater and leave those above insignificant. It's something interesting to think about.
----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[Jan 11, 2013 4:50:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18665
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
smilesmile Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 60 smilesmile

MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 01/11 - All Members:

Team rank movement report
=========================

Prior New Current
Member name Rank Change Rank Points
========================= ===== ====== ===== ===========
No movement in team ranks.sad

Points milestones report
========================
RT reached 315,000,000 points applause
finman reached 28,000,000 points applause

Runtime milestones report
=========================
No runtime milestones found. sad

Results returned milestones report
==================================
smcclarigan reached 19,000 results applause

New members report
==================
No new members found. sad

Retired members report
======================
No new retired members found. smile

For the week as a team:

Statistics  Total Run Time  Points     Results

Date (y:d:h:m:s) Earned Returned
01/11/2013 0:232:08:22:49 1,769,535 3,627
01/10/2013 1:025:16:45:40 3,306,709 6,916
01/09/2013 0:277:21:35:44 1,896,716 3,823
01/08/2013 0:328:12:53:11 2,655,880 5,576
01/07/2013 1:005:10:39:44 3,064,652 6,307
01/06/2013 1:019:17:03:14 3,311,422 6,933
01/05/2013 0:322:10:43:07 2,351,915 4,647


Team Records:
Results Returned: 11/13/2012 8,777
Points: 01/06/2013 3,311,422
Runtime: 04/05/2012 1:197:18:06:42

Team Streaks:
Results Returned:
-Over 1000: 133 days smile
-Over 2000: 133 days smile
-Over 3000: 49 days smile
-Over 4000: 0 days crying
-Over 5000: 0 days crying
-Over 6000: 0 days crying
-Over 7000: 0 days
-Over 8000: 0 days
-Over 9000: 0 days
Points:
-Over 250,000: 133 days smile
-Over 500,000: 133 days smile
-Over 750,000: 133 days smile
-Over 1,000,000: 104 days smile
-Over 1,250,000: 92 days smile
-Over 1,500,000: 75 days smile
-Over 1,750,000: 48 days smile
-Over 2,000,000: 0 days crying
-Over 2,250,000: 0 days crying
-Over 2,500,000: 0 days crying
-Over 2,750,000: 0 days crying
-Over 3,000,000: 0 days crying
-Over 3,250,000: 0 days crying
-Over 3,500,000: 0 days
Runtime:
-Over 90 days: 133 days smile
-Over 180 days: 133 days smile
-Over 270 days: 0 days crying
-Over 365 days: 0 days crying

Good crunching folks!!!!!
----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[Jan 12, 2013 4:41:22 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18665
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
smilesmile Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 60 smilesmile

MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 01/11 - Active Members

Active team members report
==========================

Current Points
Active member name Rank Change Points This Period
========================= ===== ====== =========== ===========
RT 1 0 315,058,747 851,436
GeraldRube 2 0 149,465,115 94,977
judson Somerville MD 3 0 143,408,893 196,383
Coingames 4 0 89,276,634 22,639
xroule 5 0 52,212,295 48,053
David Autumns 6 0 49,889,861 116,992
NiceMedTexMD 7 0 48,561,007 90,183
parmesian 8 0 45,753,013 11,576
brown chris 9 0 37,842,579 40,081
finman 10 0 28,003,103 36,059
dkt 11 0 27,817,019 30,786
keithhenry 12 0 26,141,798 13,891
Vuj 13 0 26,053,379 16,391
Blueprint 14 0 18,029,914 3,147
nl59056 15 0 18,011,378 3,875
darth_vader 16 0 16,975,079 16,202
Fanie 17 0 15,368,091 11,364
Esteban69 18 0 14,805,941 2,311
pramodp 19 0 12,340,924 29,190
lawrencehardin 20 0 11,786,899 12,267
PohSoon 21 0 11,097,395 4,245
smcclarigan 22 0 9,238,277 43,561
frans6nl 23 0 7,635,871 0
Tomwp 24 0 6,605,103 22,346
johng 25 0 4,056,838 0
Mechanical 26 0 3,397,600 4,355
SteelDragon 27 0 3,160,819 32,466
largethunder 28 0 2,309,285 6,884
elpe 29 0 1,788,514 1,865
Lanscader 30 0 1,609,331 2,225
CCH 31 0 1,189,966 0
newtod 32 0 1,154,424 0
Jean-Guy Germain 33 0 560,803 429
sz2000 34 0 433,417 1,477
cht! 35 0 396,826 0
pauldarleen 36 0 204,647 1,879
- dc 37 0 82,092 0
sm217144 38 0 62,754 0


Note: Active members are those who earned points in the prior 30 days.

Top Twenty active members returning points today:
01: RT - 851,436 points
02: judson Somerville MD - 196,383 points
03: David Autumns - 116,992 points
04: GeraldRube - 94,977 points
05: NiceMedTexMD - 90,183 points
06: xroule - 48,053 points
07: smcclarigan - 43,561 points
08: brown chris - 40,081 points
09: finman - 36,059 points
10: SteelDragon - 32,466 points
11: dkt - 30,786 points
12: pramodp - 29,190 points
13: Coingames - 22,639 points
14: Tomwp - 22,346 points
15: Vuj - 16,391 points
16: darth_vader - 16,202 points
17: keithhenry - 13,891 points
18: lawrencehardin - 12,267 points
19: parmesian - 11,576 points
20: Fanie - 11,364 points

Total points returned today: 1,769,535
Active members returning points today: 31
Average points per member active today: 57,081.7742
----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[Jan 12, 2013 4:42:23 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18665
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: smilesmile Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 60 smilesmile




................................CONGRATULATIONS RT ON REACHING 315,000,000 MOT POINTS !!!................................



----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[Jan 12, 2013 4:44:16 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18665
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: smilesmile Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 60 smilesmile




..............................CONGRATULATIONS finman ON REACHING 28,000,000 MOT POINTS !!!..............................



----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[Jan 12, 2013 4:45:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18665
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: smilesmile Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 60 smilesmile

IIRC, I did this once before a good while back. I would expect that the specific numbers will differ for everyone depending on their mix of machines and distribution of tasks across those machines but the trend still remains the same. I took my total run time for each project, converted to total seconds and divided that into my total points for that project to get points per second and then converted back to points per hour so the differences were more discernable. Here's what I got:

CFSW 148.15
SN2S 138.59
GFAM 132.93
DSFL 128.12
C4CW 133.38
CEP2 117.03
DDDT2 127.19
HCMD2 122.43
HFCC 120.90
HCC 104.81
HPF2 94.51
FAAH 84.65

I ordered these by the project start dates taken from the Research section of the website but the start dates don't necessarily reflect the order WCG started working on the projects. I would think that since machines have gotten more powerful over time, that would be why the number have gone upbut I've had a rather stable mix of machines. In fact, I went down from 2 C2Ds and a quad to one C2D and a quad in early-to-mid 09 but my points per hour didn't drop until projects that started about a year later. To me, it says that, all else being equal, you get more points for the same computing effort on the newest projects. Yes, getting more powerful machines should bump the numbers even higher but even then, it would seem you'd want to focus on the latest project if you want to focus on maximizing the points you get for the same computing effort. Now there's plenty of reasons for crunching on specific projects besides this but it would seem to generalize out to focusing on projects in order as they come out. Still, I don't have any data to look at where machines are regularly replaced with the latest and greatest for example so the differences there could be far greater and leave those above insignificant. It's something interesting to think about.


I obviously must be getting too old for things that are "interesting to think about". They seem increasing likely to give me a wicked headache! biggrin Yes, I've had a quad and a C2D for a good while now but not the SAME quad and C2D. Well, the quad's been the same machine but I did double the memory in it. As for the C2D's in my life, there have been more than one. I think the first wasn't much over a 1Mhz CPU. My current C2D is a fair bit beyond the 2Mhz CPU. Points earned are determined by the credit given by BOINC (server side that is) which rarely changes formula-wise and while that's the same as credit claimed for zero redundancy projects, there certainly is bound to be some sort of reasonableness check of that. So, if newer projects are earning the same points per hour of runtime as older ones, it has to be the crunchers. While my machines are ancient by tech standards, it would seem they're at least not prehistoric. I don't want to even speculate about adding GPU to the mix. That would take the headache WELL beyond wicked! biggrin Guess this is what I get for trying to squeeze every point I can out of my machines. Sigh, if I had the money to have the machine(s) I dream of.........
----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[Jan 12, 2013 5:19:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: smilesmile Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 60 smilesmile

IIRC, I did this once before a good while back. I would expect that the specific numbers will differ for everyone depending on their mix of machines and distribution of tasks across those machines but the trend still remains the same. I took my total run time for each project, converted to total seconds and divided that into my total points for that project to get points per second and then converted back to points per hour so the differences were more discernable. Here's what I got:

Interesting figures there, Keith. I always figured some projects gave slightly more points than others, but didn't think there would be that much of a difference.. although I never understood the importance of points, as its the hours and results returned that ultimately matter! Although I guess points awarded are also attributed based on the reliability/accuracy of the result returned? Never really thought much into it..

Top Twenty active members returning points today:
01: RT - 851,436 points

If I wasn't already somewhat aware of GPU crunching, I'd have thought that you must have bought a data centre for points like that.. Awesome work. How many GPUs do you have pulling those figures?

Been a nastily hot start to the year here in Australia. A massive heat wave came from out from the Indian Ocean end of 2012/start of 2013, burnt WA to a crisp for a week (~38-43 deg C, making it the hottest week on average for us since 1940s or something), before it crossed the Australian outback, believed to have reached (and is still reaching) nearly 50 deg C as it crossed the central deserts & South Australia. It recently hit our Eastern state counterparts over the past week with temperatures similar to what we had in WA (~40deg C).. Heard the comment "welcome to Australia, where even the air tries to kill you" in a news article which sounds about right..

On a better note, hope everyone's having a great start to the year smile I have a good feeling about this one!
[Jan 12, 2013 5:53:54 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher
United States
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Post Count: 2153
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: smilesmile Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 60 smilesmile

Well i lost two crunchers-- cant do anything at the moment--need to save money as i will be moving to Texas hopefully by June--then i will go to Frys s electronics and repair my crunchers--http://www.frys.com/ smile
----------------------------------------

[Jan 12, 2013 5:38:33 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: smilesmile Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 60 smilesmile

Been a nastily hot start to the year here in Australia. A massive heat wave came from out from the Indian Ocean end of 2012/start of 2013, burnt WA to a crisp for a week (~38-43 deg C, making it the hottest week on average for us since 1940s or something), before it crossed the Australian outback, believed to have reached (and is still reaching) nearly 50 deg C as it crossed the central deserts & South Australia. It recently hit our Eastern state counterparts over the past week with temperatures similar to what we had in WA (~40deg C).. Heard the comment "welcome to Australia, where even the air tries to kill you" in a news article which sounds about right..

I had to go into details here to figure out the degrees in Fahrenheit and I get 100.4F for 38C, 109.4F for 43C, and 122F for 50C. I also did not know what you meant when you referred to WA, but a quick search on Google for "wa australia" shows it as Western Australia, Australia's largest state which is about 1/3 of the continent bounded on the west by the Indian Ocean.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 12, 2013 6:18:47 PM]
[Jan 12, 2013 6:10:53 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7695
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: smilesmile Join "MyOnlineTeam" Today - Chapter 60 smilesmile

Keith:
If you are interested in doing those kind of statistics, piroque has a program called WCGDAWS which makes getting these kind of figures ridiculously easy. His website is http://www.wcgdaws.com/.
Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Jan 12, 2013 8:40:26 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 490   Pages: 49   [ Previous Page | 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread