Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 490
|
![]() |
Author |
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
IIRC, I did this once before a good while back. I would expect that the specific numbers will differ for everyone depending on their mix of machines and distribution of tasks across those machines but the trend still remains the same. I took my total run time for each project, converted to total seconds and divided that into my total points for that project to get points per second and then converted back to points per hour so the differences were more discernable. Here's what I got:
----------------------------------------CFSW 148.15 SN2S 138.59 GFAM 132.93 DSFL 128.12 C4CW 133.38 CEP2 117.03 DDDT2 127.19 HCMD2 122.43 HFCC 120.90 HCC 104.81 HPF2 94.51 FAAH 84.65 I ordered these by the project start dates taken from the Research section of the website but the start dates don't necessarily reflect the order WCG started working on the projects. I would think that since machines have gotten more powerful over time, that would be why the number have gone upbut I've had a rather stable mix of machines. In fact, I went down from 2 C2Ds and a quad to one C2D and a quad in early-to-mid 09 but my points per hour didn't drop until projects that started about a year later. To me, it says that, all else being equal, you get more points for the same computing effort on the newest projects. Yes, getting more powerful machines should bump the numbers even higher but even then, it would seem you'd want to focus on the latest project if you want to focus on maximizing the points you get for the same computing effort. Now there's plenty of reasons for crunching on specific projects besides this but it would seem to generalize out to focusing on projects in order as they come out. Still, I don't have any data to look at where machines are regularly replaced with the latest and greatest for example so the differences there could be far greater and leave those above insignificant. It's something interesting to think about. |
||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 01/11 - All Members:
----------------------------------------Team rank movement report =========================
Points milestones report ======================== RT reached 315,000,000 points ![]() finman reached 28,000,000 points ![]() Runtime milestones report ========================= No runtime milestones found. ![]() Results returned milestones report ================================== smcclarigan reached 19,000 results ![]() New members report ================== No new members found. ![]() Retired members report ====================== No new retired members found. ![]() For the week as a team: Statistics Total Run Time Points Results Team Records: Results Returned: 11/13/2012 8,777 Points: 01/06/2013 3,311,422 Runtime: 04/05/2012 1:197:18:06:42 Team Streaks: Results Returned: -Over 1000: 133 days ![]() -Over 2000: 133 days ![]() -Over 3000: 49 days ![]() -Over 4000: 0 days ![]() -Over 5000: 0 days ![]() -Over 6000: 0 days ![]() -Over 7000: 0 days -Over 8000: 0 days -Over 9000: 0 days Points: -Over 250,000: 133 days ![]() -Over 500,000: 133 days ![]() -Over 750,000: 133 days ![]() -Over 1,000,000: 104 days ![]() -Over 1,250,000: 92 days ![]() -Over 1,500,000: 75 days ![]() -Over 1,750,000: 48 days ![]() -Over 2,000,000: 0 days ![]() -Over 2,250,000: 0 days ![]() -Over 2,500,000: 0 days ![]() -Over 2,750,000: 0 days ![]() -Over 3,000,000: 0 days ![]() -Over 3,250,000: 0 days ![]() -Over 3,500,000: 0 days Runtime: -Over 90 days: 133 days ![]() -Over 180 days: 133 days ![]() -Over 270 days: 0 days ![]() -Over 365 days: 0 days ![]() Good crunching folks!!!!! |
||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
MyOnlineTeam Daily Statistics for 01/11 - Active Members
----------------------------------------Active team members report ==========================
Note: Active members are those who earned points in the prior 30 days. Top Twenty active members returning points today: 01: RT - 851,436 points 02: judson Somerville MD - 196,383 points 03: David Autumns - 116,992 points 04: GeraldRube - 94,977 points 05: NiceMedTexMD - 90,183 points 06: xroule - 48,053 points 07: smcclarigan - 43,561 points 08: brown chris - 40,081 points 09: finman - 36,059 points 10: SteelDragon - 32,466 points 11: dkt - 30,786 points 12: pramodp - 29,190 points 13: Coingames - 22,639 points 14: Tomwp - 22,346 points 15: Vuj - 16,391 points 16: darth_vader - 16,202 points 17: keithhenry - 13,891 points 18: lawrencehardin - 12,267 points 19: parmesian - 11,576 points 20: Fanie - 11,364 points Total points returned today: 1,769,535 Active members returning points today: 31 Average points per member active today: 57,081.7742 |
||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
................................CONGRATULATIONS RT ON REACHING 315,000,000 MOT POINTS !!!................................ |
||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
..............................CONGRATULATIONS finman ON REACHING 28,000,000 MOT POINTS !!!.............................. |
||
|
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind Joined: Nov 18, 2004 Post Count: 18665 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
IIRC, I did this once before a good while back. I would expect that the specific numbers will differ for everyone depending on their mix of machines and distribution of tasks across those machines but the trend still remains the same. I took my total run time for each project, converted to total seconds and divided that into my total points for that project to get points per second and then converted back to points per hour so the differences were more discernable. Here's what I got: CFSW 148.15 SN2S 138.59 GFAM 132.93 DSFL 128.12 C4CW 133.38 CEP2 117.03 DDDT2 127.19 HCMD2 122.43 HFCC 120.90 HCC 104.81 HPF2 94.51 FAAH 84.65 I ordered these by the project start dates taken from the Research section of the website but the start dates don't necessarily reflect the order WCG started working on the projects. I would think that since machines have gotten more powerful over time, that would be why the number have gone upbut I've had a rather stable mix of machines. In fact, I went down from 2 C2Ds and a quad to one C2D and a quad in early-to-mid 09 but my points per hour didn't drop until projects that started about a year later. To me, it says that, all else being equal, you get more points for the same computing effort on the newest projects. Yes, getting more powerful machines should bump the numbers even higher but even then, it would seem you'd want to focus on the latest project if you want to focus on maximizing the points you get for the same computing effort. Now there's plenty of reasons for crunching on specific projects besides this but it would seem to generalize out to focusing on projects in order as they come out. Still, I don't have any data to look at where machines are regularly replaced with the latest and greatest for example so the differences there could be far greater and leave those above insignificant. It's something interesting to think about. I obviously must be getting too old for things that are "interesting to think about". They seem increasing likely to give me a wicked headache! ![]() ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
IIRC, I did this once before a good while back. I would expect that the specific numbers will differ for everyone depending on their mix of machines and distribution of tasks across those machines but the trend still remains the same. I took my total run time for each project, converted to total seconds and divided that into my total points for that project to get points per second and then converted back to points per hour so the differences were more discernable. Here's what I got: Interesting figures there, Keith. I always figured some projects gave slightly more points than others, but didn't think there would be that much of a difference.. although I never understood the importance of points, as its the hours and results returned that ultimately matter! Although I guess points awarded are also attributed based on the reliability/accuracy of the result returned? Never really thought much into it.. Top Twenty active members returning points today: 01: RT - 851,436 points If I wasn't already somewhat aware of GPU crunching, I'd have thought that you must have bought a data centre for points like that.. Awesome work. How many GPUs do you have pulling those figures? Been a nastily hot start to the year here in Australia. A massive heat wave came from out from the Indian Ocean end of 2012/start of 2013, burnt WA to a crisp for a week (~38-43 deg C, making it the hottest week on average for us since 1940s or something), before it crossed the Australian outback, believed to have reached (and is still reaching) nearly 50 deg C as it crossed the central deserts & South Australia. It recently hit our Eastern state counterparts over the past week with temperatures similar to what we had in WA (~40deg C).. Heard the comment "welcome to Australia, where even the air tries to kill you" in a news article which sounds about right.. On a better note, hope everyone's having a great start to the year ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well i lost two crunchers-- cant do anything at the moment--need to save money as i will be moving to Texas hopefully by June--then i will go to Frys s electronics and repair my crunchers--http://www.frys.com/
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Been a nastily hot start to the year here in Australia. A massive heat wave came from out from the Indian Ocean end of 2012/start of 2013, burnt WA to a crisp for a week (~38-43 deg C, making it the hottest week on average for us since 1940s or something), before it crossed the Australian outback, believed to have reached (and is still reaching) nearly 50 deg C as it crossed the central deserts & South Australia. It recently hit our Eastern state counterparts over the past week with temperatures similar to what we had in WA (~40deg C).. Heard the comment "welcome to Australia, where even the air tries to kill you" in a news article which sounds about right.. I had to go into details here to figure out the degrees in Fahrenheit and I get 100.4F for 38C, 109.4F for 43C, and 122F for 50C. I also did not know what you meant when you referred to WA, but a quick search on Google for "wa australia" shows it as Western Australia, Australia's largest state which is about 1/3 of the continent bounded on the west by the Indian Ocean. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 12, 2013 6:18:47 PM] |
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7695 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Keith:
----------------------------------------If you are interested in doing those kind of statistics, piroque has a program called WCGDAWS which makes getting these kind of figures ridiculously easy. His website is http://www.wcgdaws.com/. Cheers
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
|
![]() |