Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 12
|
![]() |
Author |
|
SuperMecha
Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2011 Post Count: 12 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Intel's been milking this expensive quad core processor market for quite a few years, since at least 2006. Their upper mainstream product has no more than 4 cores and 8 threads. Surely they could offer a 6 core processor for the price of a 4770k. They just don't want to because they don't have to. Its just kind of annoying for people with important work to use those cores for. If we could still get a desktop with quite a bit more power than a laptop, more people would buy desktops. So Intel is to blame at least partly for the decline in desktop sales, along with Microsoft and Windows 8. Sorry didn't mean to be a Debby Downer, just had to vent a bit. There's been a lot of talk of the end of (desktop) PCs, yet the two companies most dependent on PC sales, Intel and Microsoft, are making decisions that seem to be hastening the decline in PCs by focusing on mobile and neglecting desktops. |
||
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here's hoping my 2600K and 2 3770Ks last a long time...
----------------------------------------the 2600K has 30 million points (some GPU crunching) Running at 4.2 or 4.3 GHZ (liquid of course) Maybe the next 6 core that doesn't use 130 watts TDP will be usefull. Signed, Not very patiently waiting. ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |