Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 15
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
So here am I storming up the rankings of all but the PPH, which is only showing as 120 as per the SNURK sig.
Is this the way this is calculated, ie is it Points/hours since joining, in my case (for this account) March last year (Registered Member Since: 17/03/13 09:46:06) OR - is this calculated by Points increase/24 - ie last return If this is indeed proving my PPH is really low, how can I increase it? Is this impacted by the fact that about half of my machines only come on line over night? Suggestions appreciated... |
||
|
deltavee
Ace Cruncher Texas Hill Country Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 4890 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mamajuana, Pts/h is an average based on the recent past (perhaps 30 days?). It is definitely not since joining. The only way to increase it is to get faster machines or get rid of your slow ones.
|
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thanks deltavee, I wondered if it may be something like that.
Most of my machines are 3Ghz, but the 2 MegaCrunchers (64 threads each) are 2.2Ghz, so it may be these 2 that bring down the PPH. Putting these off line, may increase the PPH, but significantly reduce the output overall, increasing the speed of machines is scheduled for later in the year - as per another post, I may have to look at moving it forward. Does the PPH really matter? I'm doing the Gflops and and returning some good stats:
I would appreciate your (and anyone else's) thoughts... |
||
|
deltavee
Ace Cruncher Texas Hill Country Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 4890 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Does the PPH really matter? Average PPH does not matter except as a way to measure your own efficiency. What matters is getting the science done even is all that is available is slower machines. Of course those who are pursuing runtime badges only care about total runtime and a slow machine is just as good as a fast one (all threads being equal). |
||
|
jonnieb-uk
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Nov 30, 2011 Post Count: 6105 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hesitantly disagreeing with deltavee
----------------------------------------![]() Looking at Mamajuana's stats as of lunchtime today: Runtime 430900777 seconds Points 13967391 13967391/430900777*60*60= 116.69 The discrepancy arises because Globe Sigs are only updated once per day. I could, however, be wrong! ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Many thanks to both of you, however, I think the important thing is that the crunching is being done as has been said. As I'm looking at upgrading my machines later in the year, I'm not going to worry about it!
I'm currently reporting about 6 months crunching time per day! I'll look at increasing that some what and forget about the points.. Thanks again... |
||
|
cjslman
Master Cruncher Mexico Joined: Nov 23, 2004 Post Count: 2082 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think the important thing is that the crunching is being done... I'm not going to worry about it! That is exactly the attitude that we all should have... let's all crunch and have fun... screw the points !!! CJSL Crunching for a better future !!! |
||
|
Jack007
Master Cruncher CANADA Joined: Feb 25, 2005 Post Count: 1604 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
818 Gflops already,
----------------------------------------I wasn't serious about you getting to a terraflop, that is IMPRESSIVE ![]() I'll trade you my efficiency for your production anyday! ![]() |
||
|
deltavee
Ace Cruncher Texas Hill Country Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 4890 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Looking at Mamajuana's stats as of lunchtime today: Runtime 430900777 seconds Points 13967391 13967391/430900777*60*60= 116.69 Looking at my stats tonight. 1804336 hours 812,201,169 points 812,201,169/1804336 = 450.13 Pts/h This is more that two and half times what is in my SUNRK sig. This is the result of the HCC1 GPU project that had very high points. The 168 Pts/sh in the SNURK sig is only what I have been averaging lately. So it must be an average of only recent runtime. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
818 Gflops already, I wasn't serious about you getting to a terraflop, that is IMPRESSIVE ![]() I'll trade you my efficiency for your production anyday! Thanks Jack, looking at todays Gflops of 857 - its still increasing, even I'm wondering if the Tflop mark is achievable... Thinking about it, I think it is! one of my MegaCrunchers is offline at the moment, this is 4p/64 th, when that comes back online, I should be able to hit the big 'T' mark! Not that would be a real milestone, there are currently only two members (with a SNURK sig) who hit that level: Halbarath - 1036 RAMMIE - 1014 Jason148963 - 893 Mamajuana - 857 Joining the '1T Club' is not my main target! |
||
|
|
![]() |