| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: Clean Energy Project - Phase 2 BETA test new workunits - July 31, 2014 [ Issues Thread ] |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 24
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher New Zealand Joined: Nov 4, 2005 Post Count: 1293 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I can also confirm that the task I had was short running about 0.96 of run-time. I also noticed that the task only had 7 jobs in it. Will be interesting to see when these tasks get to the main grid whether or not the jobs will increase back to 16 or whether they will stay low.
----------------------------------------On a side note from an earlier post my downloads parked through at reasonable speed one was about 76 kB 2nd and the other was over 200 kB per 2nd  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Four tasks received, all now in PVal. Runtime was 0.69h on an i7-4770K and 1.06h on an i5-750.
|
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Is it required to be signed up for cep2 to get these betas? When not, would it be appropriate this is checked before the regular beta tester gets them served, by mistake if you will. Technically one poorly device here meets the production requirements and is signed up for the beta program, but it would be heaving under the load.
----------------------------------------Ps, the subject reads as were there no new application, just a test to see if the new library will process correctly. True / false? [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jul 31, 2014 8:37:59 AM] |
||
|
|
branjo
Master Cruncher Slovakia Joined: Jun 29, 2012 Post Count: 1892 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Where is a possibility to sign up for CEP2? Or you meant currently crunching it?
---------------------------------------- Crunching@Home since January 13 2000. Shrubbing@Home since January 5 2006  |
||
|
|
ccandido
Senior Cruncher Joined: Jun 22, 2011 Post Count: 182 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Did't get any again...
----------------------------------------  |
||
|
|
deltavee
Ace Cruncher Texas Hill Country Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 4887 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Is it required to be signed up for cep2 to get these betas? Technically these are Beta WUs and not CEP2 WUs. Therefore you do not need to have CEP2 selected to get these Betas. |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Correct, these were just straight BETA work units. If you were signed up to receive BETA at the start of this test, your machines may have downloaded these work units.
Lavaflow, these are just a test of new work units. It is a quick test to see if they run on the grid after going through being created, downloaded by us, built into boinc workunits by us, then running on the volunteer machines. Also, as an added bonus we get to see how fast they run on WCG as well. Please note, that the large upload file that normally gets sent back with a standard CEP2 result was not sent back for these. As it was not required for the test we were conducting. Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
branjo
Master Cruncher Slovakia Joined: Jun 29, 2012 Post Count: 1892 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Mumak wrote: I'm not getting CEP2 Beta units anymore, so can't verify now. But those before were eventually downloaded completely. Some already reported back (0.5 - 1 h runtime). Progress indicator was way off, incrementing slowly, thus finished ahead of that. But this occurs with regular CEP2 as well. I second that. It has nothing to do with reality  Cheers  ETA: at least on my Mac OS X 10.9.4 15-2500S (7.0.65) on which I was able to see the progress. My Win7 64b i7-3770 (7.2.42) finished it while I was at work. Crunching@Home since January 13 2000. Shrubbing@Home since January 5 2006 [Edit 1 times, last edit by branjo at Jul 31, 2014 7:24:26 PM] |
||
|
|
johncmacalister2010@gmail.com
Veteran Cruncher Canada Joined: Nov 16, 2010 Post Count: 799 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Three processed, in PV:
----------------------------------------Page: 1 Result Name Device Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit BETA_ E225001_ 604_ S.110.C12H9N3O1.VEQQCLHADNUHEB-UHFFFAOYSA-N.1_ s1_ 14_ 1-- CRM-ESM Pending Validation 7/31/14 04:51:54 7/31/14 11:33:50 0.95 / 1.02 22.6 / 0.0 BETA_ E225001_ 216_ S.102.C11H7N3O1.XURKMHDTIXMNKW-UHFFFAOYSA-N.2_ s1_ 14_ 1-- CRM-ESM Pending Validation 7/31/14 04:51:54 7/31/14 13:07:56 0.96 / 0.99 22.0 / 0.0 BETA_ E225001_ 217_ S.102.C11H8N4.DYXGTOFCQPYHMY-UHFFFAOYSA-N.1_ s1_ 14_ 1-- CRM-ESM Pending Validation 7/31/14 04:51:54 7/31/14 13:07:56 1.08 / 1.14 25.2 / 0.0  crunching, crunching, crunching. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro (part time)  |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Four tasks received, all now in PVal. Runtime was 0.69h on an i7-4770K and 1.06h on an i5-750. This is a good one for old machines. 1.41 hours for a P3 laptop running at 800MHz. If it were running at full speed, it might have come in under the i5 time! |
||
|
|
|