Given the blue background, it must be yours to have been sledgehammered as outlier. It's really the specific pairings. Different devices seem to be in different 'historic credit averaging cycles'.

Sadly, even the simplest of consistency fixes across the different sciences are seemingly too much for the technicians to apply, something which should not take more than an afternoon. I'm talking about the outlier rule having been taken out for the more recent sciences such as mcm and ugm. No matter what, just the average of the 2 that establish the quorum. The outlier rule aggravates disparities within the 'credit new' system. No rocket science needed to see this, knreed saw this, hence the policy change that did not get backported for whatever reason, permanently on the push the problem forward and thoroughly ignore the volunteer. Pure aloofness.

From a dual core system that had not been on since oct. 01, returning it's first 2 fahv results, one taking 6 hours, a zero redundant and the other just 2, quorum 2.

FAHV_ x3JW2-B-AS_ 0883975_ 1878_ 1-- 732 Valid 11/20/14 09:38:13 11/20/14 11:20:51 0.65 22.9 / 73.7
FAHV_ x3JW2-B-AS_ 0883975_ 1878_ 0-- 732 Valid 11/20/14 09:38:03 11/20/14 12:14:53 2.02 124.4 / 73.7

faah934767_ ZINC04952108_ x3dlkRTADJ_ 00_ 0-- 719 Valid 11/20/14 09:38:03 11/20/14 16:17:15 6.08 82.1 / 82.1

Why the 'claim' of 124.4, insert some french, but the credit sum was divvied up in this case, no outlier hammering. The last 2 at end of september included one of those monsters, with pitiful hourly credit, like 3. Maybe the long term memory kicked in for some artificial intelligence revenge

7.19 faah faah922047_ZINC32930085_x3dlkRTADJ_00_0 06:53:07 (06:42:55) 10/1/2014 3:56:38 PM 10/1/2014 3:56:45 PM 97,53 Reported: OK + 60.14 MB 123.42 MB
7.32 fahv FAHV_x3ZCM_A_IN_LEDGFa_rig_0225439_0027_2 04d,01:59:14 (03d,23:02:51) 10/1/2014 1:13:53 PM 10/1/2014 1:17:54 PM 97,00 Reported: OK 30.75 MB 29.31 MB