Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 4
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1431 times and has 3 replies Next Thread
bidon
Cruncher
Joined: Dec 9, 2005
Post Count: 26
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
ARP 32 bits in place of 64 bits ???

Hi,

Using Windows 10 task manager (2004 64 bits).

I was looking into task manager and i see that my ARP task use only 32 bits.
wcgrid_arp1_wrf_7.27_windows_intelx86 (32 bits).

I had also task like for SCC which look like running in 64 bits mode.
wcgrid_scc1_vina_7.18_windows_x86_64.

The requirement page said that there is x86_64 version. Is it a problem with my computer ?

Best regards
[Nov 6, 2020 1:03:55 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ARP 32 bits in place of 64 bits ???

Have both bit sizes on my machine in the project folder, because, sometimes a 32 bit repair/rush job is sent to my 64 bit 'reliable' machine, which would at least have the job suffix _2 or higher. I have not specified to only receive 32 bit, because then sciences like MIP1 would never be received by this cruncher. So, first check the project folder which versions you have before breaking sweat.

PS, now have 2 64 bit in queue, device done 350 so far.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Nov 6, 2020 7:39:46 AM]
[Nov 6, 2020 7:38:45 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
bidon
Cruncher
Joined: Dec 9, 2005
Post Count: 26
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ARP 32 bits in place of 64 bits ???

Work unit have _0 and _1 suffix.

So it's normal.

I had no idea that there are different type of work unit. I was thinking work unit was all the same and the process was optimized for one architecture.

Thanks.
[Nov 6, 2020 1:22:50 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: ARP 32 bits in place of 64 bits ???

The work units themselves have no bit size designation until _0 goes out, if one goes to a 64 bit capable host, the copy will too go to a 64 bit capable host. If the copy goes to a 32 bit host, the wingman is required to also process in 32 bit.

Seem to remember that for reasons of expediency, the distribution system does not wait until a 32 bit only capable machine comes by, i.e. 64 bit machines will act as wingman to 32 bit machines, so what I said before might not be entirely right. That's why that config option exists, to only process 64 bit, which is a few percentage points faster, 4 to 8% it's said. Hunters for the last tasks to process will hardly do that, particularly if work for a science is limited to very limited.

Unfortunately mostly 32 bit and 64 bit do not produce the exact same bit for bit result, both copies that are presented for validation have to be processed with same bit size... weìre stuck with this somewhat slower processing at times.
[Nov 6, 2020 8:36:58 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread