Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 3
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1410 times and has 2 replies Next Thread
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Apr 3, 2009
Post Count: 2170
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
exceeded elapsed time limit

I have a question.
Below are the error messages of three results that errored out due to an 'exceeded elapsed time limit'.
All three errored out after 1 hour and 56 minutes.

exceeded elapsed time limit 7028.48 (1257988.48G/3.63G)

exceeded elapsed time limit 6987.02 (1257988.48G/2.09G)

exceeded elapsed time limit 6987.02 (1257988.48G/180.05G)

I've always understood that the exceeded elapsed time limit is the quotient of
the two numbers between parentheses in seconds; so let's take the last message:

1257988.48 / 180.05 = 6986.8840 (seconds)

6987 seconds is
(6987 - 3600) / 3600 = 1 hour + (6987 - 3600 = 3387 seconds)
(3387 - 27) / 3360 = 56 minutes + 27 seconds

But the first two messages don't adhere to that law,
(1257988.48 / 2.09) is about 90 times as much, and
(1257988.48 / 3.63) is roughly about 50 times as much.

1257988.48G (the numerator in the quotient) is this value: <rsc_fpops_bound>1257988483183040.000000</rsc_fpops_bound>
What is the denominator? What is the origin of that value, where does it stem from?
[Jan 16, 2022 2:40:04 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 772
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: exceeded elapsed time limit

I would expect the denominator to be the benchmark fpops value for the PC in question.
Were the first 2 OPN1 and the 3rd OPNG?

Paul.
----------------------------------------
Paul.
[Jan 16, 2022 7:43:39 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Apr 3, 2009
Post Count: 2170
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: exceeded elapsed time limit

I would expect the denominator to be the benchmark fpops value for the PC in question.
Were the first 2 OPN1 and the 3rd OPNG?

Paul.

They were all three OPNG-jobs, Paul:

* Showing page 1/1 of all OPN1-tasks with status ’E’ on device 7 (ID=7819354) (”4700U-ubuntu”):
<1> * OPNG_0124073_00053_0 Linux Ubuntu Error 2022-01-15T17:18:26 2022-01-16T11:13:24 0.09/1.94 1.4/0.0
<1> OPNG_0124073_00053_1 Linux Ubuntu InPrg 2022-01-16T11:13:31 2022-01-20T11:13:31 0.00/0.00 0.0/0.0

<2> * OPNG_0123601_00092_0 Linux Ubuntu Error 2022-01-14T23:14:44 2022-01-15T18:25:18 0.08/1.94 1.5/0.0
<2> OPNG_0123601_00092_1 MSWin 8.1 Valid 2022-01-15T18:25:19 2022-01-15T21:23:55 0.30/0.33 1.3/652.3

<3> * OPNG_0119097_00097_0 Linux Ubuntu Error 2022-01-11T10:33:13 2022-01-12T14:49:50 0.09/1.95 2.2/0.0
<3> OPNG_0119097_00097_1 MSWin 10 Valid 2022-01-12T14:49:55 2022-01-14T16:59:53 0.91/0.91 1.3/645.4

[Jan 17, 2022 11:35:56 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread