Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3
|
![]() |
Author |
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2170 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have a question.
Below are the error messages of three results that errored out due to an 'exceeded elapsed time limit'. All three errored out after 1 hour and 56 minutes. exceeded elapsed time limit 7028.48 (1257988.48G/3.63G) exceeded elapsed time limit 6987.02 (1257988.48G/2.09G) exceeded elapsed time limit 6987.02 (1257988.48G/180.05G) I've always understood that the exceeded elapsed time limit is the quotient of the two numbers between parentheses in seconds; so let's take the last message: 1257988.48 / 180.05 = 6986.8840 (seconds) 6987 seconds is (6987 - 3600) / 3600 = 1 hour + (6987 - 3600 = 3387 seconds) (3387 - 27) / 3360 = 56 minutes + 27 seconds But the first two messages don't adhere to that law, (1257988.48 / 2.09) is about 90 times as much, and (1257988.48 / 3.63) is roughly about 50 times as much. 1257988.48G (the numerator in the quotient) is this value: <rsc_fpops_bound>1257988483183040.000000</rsc_fpops_bound> What is the denominator? What is the origin of that value, where does it stem from? |
||
|
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 772 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would expect the denominator to be the benchmark fpops value for the PC in question.
----------------------------------------Were the first 2 OPN1 and the 3rd OPNG? Paul.
Paul.
|
||
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2170 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I would expect the denominator to be the benchmark fpops value for the PC in question. Were the first 2 OPN1 and the 3rd OPNG? Paul. They were all three OPNG-jobs, Paul: * Showing page 1/1 of all OPN1-tasks with status ’E’ on device 7 (ID=7819354) (”4700U-ubuntu”): |
||
|
|
![]() |