Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 1
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 7544 times and has 0 replies Next Thread
sptrog1
Master Cruncher
Joined: Dec 12, 2017
Post Count: 1574
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Letters to UHN

In my experience with bottles, all the necks have been at the top. This is not to say that I view UHN as a bottleneck, but it may be a way to open the bottle. In trying to understand the organizational chart of UHN, it would seem that WCG is a pimple somewhere in the organization. However, I believe it is an important pimple, and I would not want our letters to be enough of an irritant for them to want to lance the boil.
Without WCG, some research within their organization cannot continue. WCG fits their overall mission. It would be better for UHN for them to put some command emphasis behind the project. It might be important to mention the global nature of WCG and the global reputation that might accrue in those letters that originate outside North America, particularly from researchers. Overall WCG fits better into the mission of UHN than it did into the mission of IBM. It is almost an in-house research tool, but in order to attract worldwide crunchers, there would have to be a variety of interesting projects to choose from.
The address is:
University Health Network
R. Fraser Elliott Building, 1st Floor
190 Elizabeth St. Toronto, ON M5G 2C4
[Mar 25, 2023 1:30:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread