Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Locked
Total posts in this thread: 174
Posts: 174   Pages: 18   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 15568 times and has 173 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: Team UserFriendly.Org Statistics

A triple high today. We recorded the most points, results and CPU time ever.
[Dec 19, 2006 1:23:14 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: Team UserFriendly.Org Statistics

Having the BOINC database down put a severe crimp in our production. I'm glad it is back up.

Merry Christmas everyone!
[Dec 24, 2006 5:10:25 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Team UserFriendly.Org broke 100,000,000 points today!

We passed 100 million points today! Good work all!
[Jan 11, 2007 1:19:48 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher
UK
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Post Count: 11062
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Re: Team UserFriendly.Org broke 100,000,000 points today!

Nice one D and crew applause

Superb Job
----------------------------------------

[Jan 11, 2007 1:27:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: Team UserFriendly.Org broke 100,000,000 points today!

I thought to my self, you're as happy about the daily strip,
as you are that no one stops the coffee import to germany,
it's the least thing, to give a hello, when you join in here.

So... Hello everybody!smile
[Jan 11, 2007 10:04:01 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: Team UserFriendly.Org broke 100,000,000 points today!

Welcome Delaz
[Jan 12, 2007 3:36:39 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: Team UserFriendly.Org broke 100,000,000 points today!

Thank you. Even if it is not much, I should be able to some 1.000 points
a month for the good cause, and the Team. The first 1.000 are made. smile
[Jan 14, 2007 9:24:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: Team UserFriendly.Org

Interesting.

I decided to do a comparison of my various machines. (Sadly, I can't edit my earlier post on the subject, but things have changed a little.)

Doing just the basic 'CPU Benchmark' built into BOINC, I have compiled the following stats of average MIPS/MHz. (MIPS being an evenly weighted average of both Integer and Floating Point, MHz being just what it says. Processors with two cores have MHz doubled to account for their ability to do two full-speed calculations at once, processors with Hyperthreading are only counted once.)

The winner, by far, is Core Duo. My Core Duo 2.0 GHz gets more than double the Integer MIPS of my Pentium Extreme Edition running at 4.0 GHz, per core. That means that ONE core of the Core Duo is faster than BOTH cores of the Pentium-EE when doing integer work.

Core Duo: 2.905 MIPS/MHz
Pentium M: 1.357
Celeron M: 1.271
G3: 1.054
G4 (average of two G4 computers:) 1.025
Pentium Extreme Edition: 0.976
Pentium 4: 0.600

That's right, a G4 is more efficient, running only one thread, than a dual-core Pentium 4, on a MIPS/MHz basis. Of course, nobody makes a 4 GHz G4, so that's a bit of a moot point.

The best individual score is the Core Duo on Integer work, at 2.128 MIPS/MHz (per core,) the Pentium Extreme Edition, on the same Integer front, at 0.491 MIPS/MHz (per core.) At that rate, a QUAD-CORE based on Intel's (now dead) NetBurst core at 4.0 GHz would be beat by a single-core 2.0 GHz Core-based processor. The absolute worst score is the plain Pentium 4 on floating point, with 0.477 MIPS/MHz. (None of the machines beat 1.0 MIPS/MHz on floating point, while ONLY the NetBurst were under 1.0 for integer. The PowerPCs were all around 1.4-1.5 on integer, and the Celeron M and Pentium M (same basic core,) were at 1.7-1.8.

(The changes in my lineup are that the 3.8 GHz Pentium 4 670 is now a 4.0 GHz (overclocked from 3.73 GHz,) Pentium Extreme Edition 965, and the 233 Mhz G3 has been retired completely. All other specs the same. So now my MHz total is up to 21,210 MHz, 5798 MB RAM. (Hrm, I miscalculated last time on the RAM.) And to think, someone overclocked one of Intel's new quad-core Xeons up to 3.0 GHz. One dual-socket system of that would be me in total GHz of processing power available!
[Jan 23, 2007 12:06:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: Team UserFriendly.Org

Eh. None of these metrics are really a good guide to performance. Raw clock speed in particular, is almost meaningless when compared over varying architectures.

But for WCG projects, I think the floating point performance is more significant than the integer performance. Certainly for the molecule modelling projects.

The BOINC benchmark has flaws of its own, too (although it's based on dhrystone/whetstone).

I don't want to discourage your numerical musings ($DEITY knows I've tried myself often enough) but you will have to consider many, many factors before you can draw firm conclusions.
[Jan 23, 2007 12:19:04 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Re: Team UserFriendly.Org

crunchin&munchin for a cure!!! cool laughing
[Jan 23, 2007 7:02:49 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 174   Pages: 18   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread