Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 11
|
![]() |
Author |
|
BobCat13
Senior Cruncher Joined: Oct 29, 2005 Post Count: 295 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
As per an announcement by knreed, the new points system has been implemented for all projects.
http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread?thread=9545 But I am still seeing results listed as Inconclusive from the Beta testing. Was a change made to the validation after the Beta testing? Can any such change be applied retroactively to the Beta results? BETA_ faah0768_ bdb071_ mx1hhp_ 03 Inconclusive 11/03/2006 13:50:20 11/04/2006 03:47:37 6.43 69 / 0 BETA_ faah0768_ bdb071_ mx1hhp_ 03 Inconclusive 11/03/2006 13:47:38 11/06/2006 14:25:27 6.25 67 / 0 BETA_ faah0768_ bdb071_ mx1hhp_ 03 Inconclusive 11/03/2006 13:47:00 11/03/2006 23:23:06 4.66 65 / 0 BETA_ faah0768_ bdb071_ mx1hhp_ 03 Inconclusive 11/03/2006 13:46:16 11/04/2006 14:34:17 5.33 68 / 0 BETA_ faah0768_ bdb071_ mx1hhp_ 03 Waiting to be sent — — 0.00 0 / 0 BETA_ faah0768_ bdb057_ mx1hhp_ dry_ 00 No Reply 11/03/2006 09:29:53 11/06/2006 09:29:53 0.00 0 / 0 BETA_ faah0768_ bdb057_ mx1hhp_ dry_ 00 Inconclusive 11/03/2006 09:18:26 11/04/2006 02:03:14 6.84 76 / 0 BETA_ faah0768_ bdb057_ mx1hhp_ dry_ 00 Inconclusive 11/03/2006 09:18:19 11/03/2006 19:49:26 5.70 61 / 0 BETA_ faah0768_ bdb057_ mx1hhp_ dry_ 00 Inconclusive 11/03/2006 09:18:00 11/03/2006 18:42:46 6.68 46 / 0 BETA_ faah0768_ bdb057_ mx1hhp_ dry_ 00 Waiting to be sent — — 0.00 0 / 0 |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Bobcat,
----------------------------------------Eventually your 'Inconclusive' will convert to 'Valid' or Invalid depending how things work out at the time when additional copies come back for validation. If its decided to not send out additional copies, the Inconclusives will be converted to either of the 2 final states depending on the majority agreeing and accordingly points awarded. Patience is required until the Beta is deemed completed. cheers
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The FightAIDS@Home beta test is still suspended. As a result some of the Inconclusive results will remain that way for awhile until we can release another version. We that version in development right now and hope to resume the beta shortly.
As you may notice - you might see some results in a 'Waiting to be sent out' state. That is due to us not letting any more work be sent out for the FightAIDS@Home beta until the new version is available. |
||
|
BobCat13
Senior Cruncher Joined: Oct 29, 2005 Post Count: 295 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks to both of you for the info. I see the "waiting to be sent" has now changed to "In progress".
|
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Yes BobCat13, we're on the move again.
----------------------------------------knreed, just notice that HDC 5.14 went into production, thus assume the HDC part of the Beta run was concluded. You need to put notify folk as Firewalls are going to spring up again, and Threadmaster users will have to add another line in their application parms. cheers
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The inconclusives on my AMD have now turned to invalid.
Should I look for a problem my end or is it an irregularity in the work sent out?. Cheers. ozylynx ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I don't think you can draw any conclusions from work units that were partly crunched with the old beta version. It simply means that the final quorum member agreed with the other results, not with yours.
Wait until fresh work units are crunched. Then we will know it's working properly. |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Don't know, but in the past it came accidentally, that supplemental WU's were send with a new software version, thus causing slight variation in the quorum and throwing invalids. Cant see a way in the Result Status pages to reveal that, if the case.
----------------------------------------Fortunately it's beta.... manure happens ;>)
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Nov 8, 2006 8:46:15 AM] |
||
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The inconclusives on my AMD have now turned to invalid. Should I look for a problem my end or is it an irregularity in the work sent out?. Cheers. ozylynx ![]() If these were FAAH BETA work units, then I would not worry about something on your machine at the moment. Please check to make sure that the BETA version of the application was not the latest version for the work units that are labeled invalid. -Uplinger |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Yes the invalid results are in the Beta. The one which was paused due to AMD/Intel compatibility problems.
This is my first Beta test and as my 'invalid' results incurred a point penalty, the inference was that my machine had failed in some way and the work should have been completed differently. If this is the case then I need to find out why it failed. The machine in question is very heavily loaded with many background and foreground tasks which could potentially 'break' the application. That's my understanding of beta testing. Break it and then find out why. Not nit-picking, just trying to find my way. Cheers. ozylynx ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |