Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5561
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
An interesting post on a blog topic called "Summer in the city" (borrowed from a famous song):
----------------------------------------Dorlomin says..... We are having a roasty toasty summer here in the UK as well, even a dry hot hot hot Glastonbury! Rumor has it July 6 was hottest day ever recorded on UAH. But have not been able to confirm that..... So, a roasty, toasty summer in the UK, even dry hot hot hot Glastonbury.. the names rings familiar. Anyone from that area to fill us in on the real world? IS it true? Google is my friend and spits it all out, all that's been, not hidden: https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=glaston...ficial&client=firefox yes, I've started to run the HTTPS-Everywhere extension that I think esoteric17 posted on in the Firefox add-on thread. Thought to have read here it was 12C somewhere there in England and talk of a second coat just when a cold weather spell slipped in. As I quoted Tom Sawyer before: Climate is what you expect, Weather is what you get, and some maybe that what they wish for. Tom was not aware that Climate these days is subject to change.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() The thread just needed a little smiley Sek Eso you gave up listening a long time ago All you continue to do is insult me and misrepresent my words as it suits you It is plain for all to see Meanwhile.... why is this thread important to all on the WCG See the first post Keep on crunching..while we still can Dave ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
![]() The thread just needed a little smiley Sek Eso you gave up listening a long time ago All you continue to do is insult me and misrepresent my words as it suits you It is plain for all to see Meanwhile.... why is this thread important to all on the WCG See the first post Keep on crunching..while we still can Dave Thats OK Dave you have to be the Teflon Don--**** --roll on sweet river roll on!! life is good and they cant see it ![]() [Edit 2 times, last edit by TKH at Jul 13, 2010 11:26:18 AM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Oops, I was once lectured by DA that I should not believe everything printed on the internet.... "I've got a mind of my own" he said, belligerently... hmmm well, Svante Arrhenius figured out what atmospheric CO2 in increased amounts would do... in 1896. The physics man, not the physical man, have long found the proof... known and reproducible since 1955. The carbon levels are more important than CO2--at this time it is385 parts a million and the exceptical level is 350 and increasing 2ppm per year |
||
|
retsof
Former Community Advisor USA Joined: Jul 31, 2005 Post Count: 6824 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oops, I was once lectured by DA that I should not believe everything printed on the internet.... "I've got a mind of my own" he said, belligerently... hmmm well, Svante Arrhenius figured out what atmospheric CO2 in increased amounts would do... in 1896. The physics man, not the physical man, have long found the proof... known and reproducible since 1955. The carbon levels are more important than CO2--at this time it is385 parts a million and the exceptical level is 350 and increasing 2ppm per year That's a little like saying that the hydrogen level is more important than H2O. One is part of the other. What does that mean? CO(sub 2), or O=C=O, with one carbon atom bonded to two oxygen atoms, is the gas CARBON Dioxide. The level you are quoting is parts per million of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Diamonds are only carbon; so is graphite. Round up all of the engagement rings and pencils.
SUPPORT ADVISOR
Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads School i7 4770 8threads Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads Home i7 3540M 4threads50% |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Add Stanford to the list of conspirators
Heat waves and extremely high temperatures could be commonplace in the U.S. by 2039, Stanford study finds http://news.stanford.edu/news/2010/july/extreme-heat-study-070810.html ![]() By 2039, most of the U.S. could experience at least four seasons equally as intense as the hottest season ever recorded from 1951-1999, according to Stanford University climate scientists. In most of Utah, Colorado, Arizona and New Mexico, the number of extremely hot seasons could be as high as seven. |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
For those who actually read and keep up to speed, the CO2 atmospheric parts per million, Volume is 392 presently. Presume exceptical is new speak for acceptable. Well that is the upper limit that is thought to limit the temperature rise to flatten out at 2C, but save, no, because the CO2 rise is subject to a 30 year effect lag, meaning, temp rise has CO2 in tow and CO2 then pushes the temps further and so on... that vicious circle. 385 ppmv is long old news, marysduby i.e. a figure of end 2007, so that not 2 per annum but actually near 3.3 and accelerating. Think it's still save to think we'll be holding below 450 by 2025? Pipedreams I think... that juggernaut is on the move.
----------------------------------------
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
NASA: First half of 2010 breaks the thermometer — despite “recent minimum of solar irradiance”
http://climateprogress.org/2010/07/10/nasa-hottest-year-solar-minimum/ It’s all the more powerful evidence of human-caused warming “because it occurs when the recent minimum of solar irradiance is having its maximum cooling effect,” as a recent must-read NASA paper notes. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Investigation reveals conflict of interest-- http://www.centredaily.com/2010/07/13/2089906...ion-reveals-conflict.html
|
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Greenland Hype Meltdown: NASA GISS Data 'shows that Greenland has not warmed at all over the last 90 years' (Expect some temperature 'adjustments' soon to 'fix' this 'problem')
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/07/12/greenland-hype-meltdown/ |
||
|
|
![]() |