Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 5561
Posts: 5561   Pages: 557   [ Previous Page | 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 625593 times and has 5560 replies Next Thread
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher
UK
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Post Count: 11062
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Not sure how much longer they will be able to keep crunching in the UK

----------------------------------------

[Feb 13, 2011 9:09:06 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher
UK
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Post Count: 11062
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Not sure how much longer they will be able to keep crunching in the UK

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12417515

The PR onslaught continues

Incidentally as a legacy to my Grandchildren I hope to leave behind a better World having stood up against the seemingly never ending lie that their World is doomed


Dave
----------------------------------------

[Feb 13, 2011 5:43:18 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher
United States
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Post Count: 2153
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Not sure how much longer they will be able to keep crunching in the UK

----------------------------------------

[Feb 14, 2011 1:29:35 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher
UK
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Post Count: 11062
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Not sure how much longer they will be able to keep crunching in the UK


----------------------------------------

[Feb 14, 2011 12:11:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher
United States
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Post Count: 2153
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Not sure how much longer they will be able to keep crunching in the UK


Very hot--warm??--maybe cool!!
----------------------------------------

[Feb 14, 2011 3:00:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher
UK
Joined: Nov 16, 2004
Post Count: 11062
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Not sure how much longer they will be able to keep crunching in the UK

Here's a nice piece of work. You'll like this Gerald

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stor...the_hottest_year_ever.pdf
----------------------------------------

[Feb 15, 2011 10:51:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher
United States
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Post Count: 2153
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Not sure how much longer they will be able to keep crunching in the UK

UK Met Office explicitly contradicts Dr. Hansen’s claim:--- That says it all!!
----------------------------------------

[Feb 18, 2011 9:15:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher
United States
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Post Count: 2153
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Not sure how much longer they will be able to keep crunching in the UK

Another victory for science! House votes 244-179 to kill U.S. funding of UN IPCC! 'It no longer wishes to have the IPCC prepare its comprehensive international climate science assessments'---- http://www.climatedepot.com/r/9853/Another-vi...Depot+%28Climate+Depot%29
----------------------------------------

[Feb 19, 2011 8:43:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 748
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Not sure how much longer they will be able to keep crunching in the UK

This may be slightly OT, but interesting reading for all.

My outside light bulbs burn out quite often, and I was considering replacing one (a 60 watt bulb) with a light-emitting diode (LED) bulb (very expensive) to see how it performs.

I decided to see what information was available on the web, and found this study on a U.S. government website., entitled "Performance of Incandescent A-Type and Decorative Lamps and LED Replacements - CALiPER Benchmark Report", prepared under contract for the Department of Energy.

The article is accessible here: CALiPER Report

This report compares performance of incandescent bulbs, Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs), and LEDs.

One thing that caught my eye was on page 22 of the report:

Manufacturer Claims

The majority of LED A-type replacement lamps and decorative lamps do not meet manufacturer performance claims. Most products carry claims such as “equivalent to a 25-W lamp” or “replaces a 40-W lamp” or “90% more efficient than a 60-W lamp.” Typically, CALiPER testing reveals that these lamps produce only 10-60% of their claimed light output, and often their directionality would not make them suitable replacements for omnidirectional lamps. In addition, in many cases the SSL products have color characteristics that are not typical of the products they claim to replace (such as much colder color temperatures, poor CRI, or light that is not truly white).

Performance claims for energy efficiency also are usually incorrect or misleading. The majority of products draw more power while producing less light output than claimed, reducing their efficacy. Because of low light output levels, typically two or more LED replacement lamps may be needed to produce the output of one incandescent A lamp, so energy savings would be diminished or lost entirely. For applications requiring very low light levels, some LED lamps could provide energy-saving alternatives. For example, some better-performing LED replacements that claim to replace 40-W incandescents would in fact be suitable to replace 25-W incandescent lamps and still achieve energy savings.

Whether you are an "AGW proponent","denier", or anywhere in between, I think you will find this study and the enclosed graphs interesting reading.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by littlepeaks at Feb 21, 2011 4:05:36 AM]
[Feb 21, 2011 3:39:34 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 748
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Not sure how much longer they will be able to keep crunching in the UK

Well, I went down to the light bulb store. An LED replacement bulb cost $87.50. The sales lady demonstrated one, and I wasn't impressed. I ended up buying a cold-cathode light bulb for $26.50. It eats up 10W. of power and the manufacturer states that it replaces 50-60 watt incandescent bulbs and has a lifetime of 15,000 hours. She demonstrated showroom, and it functioned pretty well, although took some time to reach peak brightness. She said this type performs well in cold weather in outside applications.
[Feb 21, 2011 10:43:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 5561   Pages: 557   [ Previous Page | 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread