Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 5561
|
![]() |
Author |
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
---------------------------------------- ![]() |
||
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12417515
----------------------------------------The PR onslaught continues Incidentally as a legacy to my Grandchildren I hope to leave behind a better World having stood up against the seemingly never ending lie that their World is doomed Dave ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Al Gore – The Weasel http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/al-gore-the-weasel/
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Very hot--warm??--maybe cool!! ![]() |
||
|
David Autumns
Ace Cruncher UK Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 11062 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here's a nice piece of work. You'll like this Gerald
----------------------------------------http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stor...the_hottest_year_ever.pdf ![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
UK Met Office explicitly contradicts Dr. Hansen’s claim:--- That says it all!!
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
GeraldRube
Master Cruncher United States Joined: Nov 20, 2004 Post Count: 2153 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Another victory for science! House votes 244-179 to kill U.S. funding of UN IPCC! 'It no longer wishes to have the IPCC prepare its comprehensive international climate science assessments'---- http://www.climatedepot.com/r/9853/Another-vi...Depot+%28Climate+Depot%29
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 748 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This may be slightly OT, but interesting reading for all.
----------------------------------------My outside light bulbs burn out quite often, and I was considering replacing one (a 60 watt bulb) with a light-emitting diode (LED) bulb (very expensive) to see how it performs. I decided to see what information was available on the web, and found this study on a U.S. government website., entitled "Performance of Incandescent A-Type and Decorative Lamps and LED Replacements - CALiPER Benchmark Report", prepared under contract for the Department of Energy. The article is accessible here: CALiPER Report This report compares performance of incandescent bulbs, Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs), and LEDs. One thing that caught my eye was on page 22 of the report: Manufacturer Claims The majority of LED A-type replacement lamps and decorative lamps do not meet manufacturer performance claims. Most products carry claims such as “equivalent to a 25-W lamp” or “replaces a 40-W lamp” or “90% more efficient than a 60-W lamp.” Typically, CALiPER testing reveals that these lamps produce only 10-60% of their claimed light output, and often their directionality would not make them suitable replacements for omnidirectional lamps. In addition, in many cases the SSL products have color characteristics that are not typical of the products they claim to replace (such as much colder color temperatures, poor CRI, or light that is not truly white). Performance claims for energy efficiency also are usually incorrect or misleading. The majority of products draw more power while producing less light output than claimed, reducing their efficacy. Because of low light output levels, typically two or more LED replacement lamps may be needed to produce the output of one incandescent A lamp, so energy savings would be diminished or lost entirely. For applications requiring very low light levels, some LED lamps could provide energy-saving alternatives. For example, some better-performing LED replacements that claim to replace 40-W incandescents would in fact be suitable to replace 25-W incandescent lamps and still achieve energy savings. Whether you are an "AGW proponent","denier", or anywhere in between, I think you will find this study and the enclosed graphs interesting reading. [Edit 2 times, last edit by littlepeaks at Feb 21, 2011 4:05:36 AM] |
||
|
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 748 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, I went down to the light bulb store. An LED replacement bulb cost $87.50. The sales lady demonstrated one, and I wasn't impressed. I ended up buying a cold-cathode light bulb for $26.50. It eats up 10W. of power and the manufacturer states that it replaces 50-60 watt incandescent bulbs and has a lifetime of 15,000 hours. She demonstrated showroom, and it functioned pretty well, although took some time to reach peak brightness. She said this type performs well in cold weather in outside applications.
|
||
|
|
![]() |