Gerald I had just read the draft and came to that conclusion

With that level of disconnect with reality and those declarations of intent

If they were uttered by the ordinary citizen they would be sectioned

They are an imminent danger to themselves and society.


Earlier this evening I spent some time in the dark.(Sun set at 3:51pm in the afternoon today where I live) There was a local power outage. I live in a flat entirely driven by electricity.

No heating, no hot water, no lighting, no cups of coffee, no means to cook food, no washing machine, no iron, no freezer/refrigerator, no telephone service, no broadband, no radio, no tv , no rechargeable anything. Last but by no means least no computers running and no research being contributed to the global knowledge that is the World Community Grid.

A great deal of the health providing and the sanitary benefits of electricity disappear like the heat out of my roof on a sub zero night.. as soon as it goes off

A brief 45 minute vision of our future if this lunacy continues to be given free reign

Dave

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45623945#.TuQPjWMr2dA

The 194-party conference agreed to start negotiations on a new accord that would put all countries under the same legal regime to enforce their commitments to control greenhouse gases. It would take effect by 2020 at the latest.


yet more of that fantastic democracy



I don't remember voting for that either

Do you?

0.03902% of the atmosphere is CO2 and this is the thermostat that controls the Global Mean Temperature. The Moon is made of Cheese and there are Fairies at the bottom of everyone's garden.

If you can't see them you are not looking hard enough

Dave

Good news. The talented strategists left the UNFCCC team before COP17 in Durban. The A-graders saw the trainwreck coming and moved on.

Everyone knows it’s a herculean task to get 190-odd countries to sign anything, and with a typical pragmatical approach the UN drafting team have gone for … not just a new “International Court” (crikey!) but rights for Mother Earth (can we be sued by a rock?), and oh boy, the holy grail, the whole kit and caboodle … we demand Peace On Earth, and a Partridge in a Pear Tree, as Part 47a, and starting by morning tea tomorrow.

Monckton reports that the funereal collapsing Durban talks still held the highest of ambitions. Godlike even. The real action behind the posters of parrots and pleas to save pygmy corals, or spotted limpets is the plea to make some unelected bureaucrats the totalitarian Kings of The World.

In part it’s chilling, a New International Court — which could presumably try you for crimes against coastlines, clouds, or (more likely) against endangered windfarms. Those with their hands on the legal wheel want the power to direct money (was that $1.6 Trillion?) from the richest nations to their friends, patrons, or pet causes. If they became the anointed Kings, it would swiftly become a crime to speak doubts of climate models upon which billions of trades depends. The darkest evil always comes cloaked with helpful intentions.

Fortunately, what’s left of the UN strategic team is even lower caliber than B-grade, beyond Z, somewhere into hexadecimal.

Ladies and Gentlemen, the grown-ups in the IPCC-support-team left the party sometime after Copenhagen, and the Z++ team are left to guard the bones. No one can take this wild ambit claim seriously. http://joannenova.com.au/2011/12/durban-wild-...thing-arother-agreed-too/

Just trying to raise my quota of posts---We all know AGW is real

ELIZABETH JACKSON: The United Nations climate talks in Durban are going into extra time and there's a gloomy assessment emerging of the shape of a final deal. It seems like the big emitters China, Indian and the United States have all combined to prevent any prospect of a deal that carries the phrase, 'legally binding'. A final communiqu� is expected sometime today. http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2011/s3388168.htm