Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research Forum: The Clean Energy Project - Phase 2 Forum Thread: CEP2: Saving CPU time, by cutting the second reporter short at minimum. |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 4
|
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
For Techs and cleanenergy, to stock up their plate:
----------------------------------------Referring to other discussions, maybe a slight twist, saving crunch time rather than increasing. If it's okay for a shorter/cut off task to form a valid quorum with a task that get's to run all 16 jobs successfully, without RCx=...etc, would it make sense to send a signal to a ''late'' client to cut the calculation short to just the minimum? In example: Copy _0 is returned by a fast/reliable client in 12 hours, takes 8 hours to compute. Copy _1 is not yet reported at that point in time. When copy _0 has The logic would only work for all 16 jobs completed in a task. Of course there are buts such as ''what if the completed task fails on first validation attempt?". Maybe these fast returned tasks could pass through some kind of pre-validation, if that were possible. Thinking out loud ;)) --//-- PS: Of course, if the idea was already proposed [gray cells failing, think we had an intentional slow/fast quorum pairing before], all credit to her/him for coming up with same, before me ;O) [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at May 27, 2011 6:29:29 AM] |
||
|
anhhai
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Mar 22, 2005 Post Count: 839 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Sekerob, cleanenergy mention a few months ago ( i think in Janurary) that they are working on a new design so that there will only 1 copy of each WU sent out. However, I thought he/she mention that it would only a short amount of time before they can release a beta level, yet we have heard of nothing. Something more important must have came up, like everywhere else.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 2955 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
There was also talk of creating a feature that allowed us crunchers to decide whether to allow the CEP2 WU's to run longer than the 12hr cut off limit. Thus, it may be this that's taking a little longer to prepare/test in the background than what was originally thought.
----------------------------------------I'm personally hoping though, that there'll be a Beta test coming up soon... |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Well, traced and could not find a prior proposal to cut number 2 short if first returner did the task in full. Think ''emotionally'' no one would have an issue with this instead of being pre-designated to only get the shorter.
Coincidence wanted the below quorum to complete from my quad: E202246_ 862_ A.24.C20H15N3S.79.1.set1d06_ 2-- 640 Valid 27-5-11 17:37:56 28-5-11 06:41:54 7.02 129.7 / 150.3 < moi E202246_ 862_ A.24.C20H15N3S.79.1.set1d06_ 1-- 640 Valid 27-5-11 14:21:34 27-5-11 15:29:02 0.30 32.0 / 28.2 The first to return only did 1 job of 16, then bowed out with a RC - 0x1 and got the dandy credit equivalent of 94 per hour. Great deal ;P --//-- |
||
|
|