Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 13
Posts: 13   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1572 times and has 12 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Are there serious Work-Units errors ?

Seeing not 7 hours a 26287 with a compound of the [well familiar] ZINC library, let me then add another educated guess. The techs are running a selection [not through beta] to find out their computing behavior. When done, they'll be able to device an automated WU build script so they'll get the target mean time they want them to run at.

6.40 faah faah26287_ZINC01709189_x3NF6b_00_0 - (-) 0.00 0.000 08:25:27 26-11-2011 15:39 06-12-2011 15:39 Ready to start

Whatever, they run faultless and reliable as always with the forum in deafening silence to confirm that.

--//--
[Nov 26, 2011 3:51:02 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
herflick
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Nov 11, 2009
Post Count: 176
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Are there serious Work-Units errors ?

andzgrid - Thanks for that post.

The problem with the way Work Units are names in FAAH is that it is easy to figure out the batch number, however the numbers after the name "ZINC..." dont go in order, so it is hard to figure out how many WU go into a particular batch.

I think that once the next FAAH website gets an update on the Status page we will know what is going on and if we are working on an extension or project 38.
[Nov 26, 2011 3:57:37 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Are there serious Work-Units errors ?

Is this kind of error normal? confused

Result Log

Result Name: faah28518_ ZINC08355287_ x3NF6b_ 00_ 1--
<core_client_version>6.12.33</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63)
</message>
<stderr_txt>
INFO:[05:32:14] Start AutoGrid...

autogrid: autogrid4: Successful Completion.
INFO:[05:32:44] End AutoGrid...
Beginning AutoDock...
INFO: Setting num_generations: 27000
About to enter main loop...(dockings already completed: 0)
_maxGenSeenSoFar changed: 6750
Updating Best Energy for WU: 0.00
Finished Docking number 0
Updating Best Energy for WU: -6.99
Finished Docking number 1
.
.
Finished Docking number 20
Updating Best Energy for WU: -8.19
Finished Docking number 21
.
.
Finished Docking number 35
Updating Best Energy for WU: -8.28
Finished Docking number 36
.
.
.
Finished Docking number 78
Updating Best Energy for WU: -8.40
Finished Docking number 79
.
.
Finished Docking number 99

________________________________________________________________________________

autodock4: Successful Completion on "World Community Grid device"

________________________________________________________________________________

INFO:[10:09:14] Start AutoGrid...

autogrid: autogrid4: Successful Completion.
INFO:[10:11:29] End AutoGrid...
SIGSEGV: segmentation violation
Stack trace (11 frames):
[0x80b3d1b]
[0x811ab78]
[0xf7781400]
[0x810885e]
[0x8108acc]
[0x807e63a]
[0x80a4e56]
[0x80a59d1]
[0x80a6be3]
[0x811cc7a]
[0x8048131]

Exiting...

</stderr_txt>
]]>


Boinc ver 6.12.33(x86)
Ubuntu 11.10 kernel Linux 3.0.0-14-generic(x86-64)
Intel Celeron D 336 2.8GHz(without overclock)
533Mhz RAM 512MB*2(without overclock and passed by memtest86+ ver 4.20)
[Jan 5, 2012 4:42:39 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 13   Pages: 2   [ Previous Page | 1 2 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread