Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 12
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 13, 2009 Post Count: 1066 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 6.25 work units are running a little under 3 hours on my i7-3770 (not overclocked) on Win7 64-bit (BOINC 7.0.64 x64). This seems reasonably fast, but this is one of those VINA projects where Linux has an advantage, but I have not seen a comparison of how much.
Thanks to anyone who can compare them. |
||
|
RaymondFO
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Nov 30, 2004 Post Count: 561 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 6.25 work units are running a little under 3 hours on my i7-3770 (not overclocked) on Win7 64-bit (BOINC 7.0.64 x64). This seems reasonably fast, but this is one of those VINA projects where Linux has an advantage, but I have not seen a comparison of how much. Thanks to anyone who can compare them. Here is a thread for you to review. The Ubuntu/Windows 7 Runtime Project [Edit 1 times, last edit by RaymondFO at May 3, 2013 3:03:54 PM] |
||
|
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 13, 2009 Post Count: 1066 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks, but for such a long post it was remarkably unhelpful, and the last entry was even before DSFL 64 bit was released.
|
||
|
Falconet
Master Cruncher Portugal Joined: Mar 9, 2009 Post Count: 3295 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I posted a couple here but they were too few and very old now.
----------------------------------------But from what I see with my computer, they are currently with approximately the same runtime as GFAM, that is, most finish within 2 CPU hours and only a few ever reach more than 2.5 hours. This on Linux Mint 14 X64. AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz |
||
|
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 13, 2009 Post Count: 1066 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Falconet,
Thank you. That is very helpful. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The 6.25 work units are running a little under 3 hours on my i7-3770 (not overclocked) on Win7 64-bit (BOINC 7.0.64 x64). This seems reasonably fast, but this is one of those VINA projects where Linux has an advantage, but I have not seen a comparison of how much. Thanks to anyone who can compare them. Now why this one was not seen when bumped to near top, just days ago, I will not prod to Q&A... the modified title of this thread tells it all: SN2S+DSFL+GFAM: Anyone else seeing the 64bit ...inux compared to Windows? It's a QED case for me, no further debate required ;O) |
||
|
mmstick
Senior Cruncher Joined: Aug 19, 2010 Post Count: 151 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm getting work units on my 4Ghz FX-8120 to finish over twice as fast as compared to Windows. I took a picture for #showyourdesktopfriday which shows the speedy return rates.
![]() Many sets seem to run ~3 hours or less per core out of 8 cores, with some sets running twice as long. I notice all of my wingmen are significantly slower than I am at processing a work unit, which is rare considering the majority of users have Intel processors and Intel cores have higher single-threaded performance |
||
|
cowtipperbs
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Aug 24, 2009 Post Count: 78 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is there any way to tell which project would benefit from running Linux over Windows, other than knowing if they are running VINA?
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
mmstick
Senior Cruncher Joined: Aug 19, 2010 Post Count: 151 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In general, it's always been:
----------------------------------------If you have an AMD processor, Linux will always perform better. If you take a look at the GCC compiler which is used to compile software on Linux, then look at the inferior compilers on Windows; it makes even more sense that apps on Linux perform faster. Other than that, it also comes down to how a Linux or Windows version was coded. If both are coded equally, Linux will always run better, but that's not guaranteed. You just have to try and see yourself. I'd venture a guess that the developers desperately attempt to optimize the Windows version as much as possible because the majority of systems are running Windows here. However, at the same time, many of the people running these scientific applications off the grid are running Linux, such as those supercomputers. I have my suspicion that Windows will fall within a decade and be overcome by Linux. We might even see Microsoft Linux. [Edit 2 times, last edit by mmstick at Jun 22, 2013 9:00:40 AM] |
||
|
Stiwi
Advanced Cruncher Joined: May 19, 2012 Post Count: 75 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
||
|
|
![]() |