Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research Forum: The Clean Energy Project - Phase 2 Forum Thread: This has got to be some sort of record. [ Resolved ] |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 26
|
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
My experience conflicts with that, i.e. I have always seen points being awarded in this situation. I wonder if the database maintenance last night caused the points award to be delayed until after you looked but before the workunit deletion occurred.
----------------------------------------Edit: spelling [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 5, 2013 1:59:36 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
hmm.. yesterday was wednesday - backup day, so it is possible, I checked it twice a day...
|
||
|
AgrFan
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 17, 2008 Post Count: 358 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Error #3 ...
----------------------------------------E214991_ 213_ C.38.C30H12N2OS5.00183163.0.set1d06_ 4-- - In Progress 9/6/13 04:33:23 9/9/13 04:33:23 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 E214991_ 213_ C.38.C30H12N2OS5.00183163.0.set1d06_ 3-- 640 Error 9/5/13 18:03:23 9/6/13 04:18:58 10.00 233.4 / 0.0 <== me E214991_ 213_ C.38.C30H12N2OS5.00183163.0.set1d06_ 2-- 640 Error 9/4/13 15:28:07 9/5/13 17:47:38 12.00 169.4 / 0.0 E214991_ 213_ C.38.C30H12N2OS5.00183163.0.set1d06_ 1-- 640 Error 9/3/13 05:28:15 9/4/13 13:41:50 12.00 228.0 / 0.0 E214991_ 213_ C.38.C30H12N2OS5.00183163.0.set1d06_ 0-- 640 Error 9/2/13 05:23:05 9/3/13 03:40:54 7.31 240.6 / 0.0 [Edit 3 times, last edit by AgrFan at Sep 6, 2013 10:48:14 PM] |
||
|
seippel
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Apr 16, 2009 Post Count: 392 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
We recently identified an issue where some newer CEP2 workunits with large molecules and a high number of atoms could exceed one of the thresholds set in the validator (even though the result was actually valid). This was corrected earlier today and work units going forward should validate correctly. Unfortunately, older work units no longer have results in the database and can't be revalidated.
Seippel |
||
|
AgrFan
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 17, 2008 Post Count: 358 Status: Offline Project Badges: |
Thanks Seippel !!!
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by AgrFan at Sep 7, 2013 1:53:43 AM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
We recently identified an issue where some newer CEP2 workunits with large molecules and a high number of atoms could exceed one of the thresholds set in the validator (even though the result was actually valid). This was corrected earlier today and work units going forward should validate correctly. Unfortunately, older work units no longer have results in the database and can't be revalidated. Seippel G'day Seippel. Thought it might have been the tasks/validator, were all good then. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 7, 2013 4:20:48 AM] |
||
|
|