Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 
World Community Grid Forums
  Category: Active Research
  Forum: Mapping Cancer Markers Forum
  Thread: work unit finished in 0.0 hours

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 10
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 3036 times and has 9 replies Next Thread
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 748
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
work unit finished in 0.0 hours
What does this mean?

MCM1_ 0000172_ 4614_ 1-- 726 Valid 11/21/13 04:17:16 11/21/13 13:45:25 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
MCM1_ 0000172_ 4614_ 0-- 726 Valid 11/21/13 04:17:03 11/21/13 15:19:20 0.00 0.1 / 0.0

Did our PCs actually do something or not?
[Nov 22, 2013 4:08:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7671
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: work unit finished in 0.0 hours
What does this mean?

MCM1_ 0000172_ 4614_ 1-- 726 Valid 11/21/13 04:17:16 11/21/13 13:45:25 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
MCM1_ 0000172_ 4614_ 0-- 726 Valid 11/21/13 04:17:03 11/21/13 15:19:20 0.00 0.1 / 0.0

Did our PCs actually do something or not?

They did something at the speed of light so relativistically an infinite amount was accomplished in no time flat. laughing
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Nov 22, 2013 4:50:47 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: work unit finished in 0.0 hours
Hello littlepeaks,
The computer did something. The question is whether it discovered an error in the manufacture of work units, an error in the program or an error in the algorithm (an unspecified case). Let the scientists and the WCG staff sort it out.

biggrin Though I would like an eventual mention on the forum of what causes this, if only for my entertainment.

Lawrence
[Nov 22, 2013 4:52:39 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
NixChix
Veteran Cruncher
United States
Joined: Apr 29, 2007
Post Count: 1187
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: work unit finished in 0.0 hours
Littlepeaks, please post your results log showing the stderr.txt file.

Cheers coffee
----------------------------------------
[Nov 22, 2013 5:44:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 748
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: work unit finished in 0.0 hours
Littlepeaks, please post your results log showing the stderr.txt file.

Cheers coffee


Result Name: MCM1_ 0000172_ 4614_ 1--
<core_client_version>6.10.58</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
Commandline = projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcgrid_mcm1_7.26_windows_intelx86 -SettingsFile MCM1_0000172_4614.txt -DatabaseFile dataset-17_72_SDG_v1.txt
Initializing
Running
Result.out = 110.000000
Run complete, CPU time: 5.023232
05:45:27 (7416): called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
]]>
[Nov 22, 2013 5:30:31 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
NixChix
Veteran Cruncher
United States
Joined: Apr 29, 2007
Post Count: 1187
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: work unit finished in 0.0 hours
Thanks,
It didn't even start pass 0. At least it gave up in 5 seconds. Mine take 5 hours to figure that out. d oh

Cheers coffee
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by NixChix at Nov 23, 2013 10:28:38 PM]
[Nov 23, 2013 10:28:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Apr 28, 2007
Post Count: 748
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: work unit finished in 0.0 hours
Maybe I should disconnect the flux capacitor from the CPU to see if that changes things.
[Nov 24, 2013 5:44:03 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
NixChix
Veteran Cruncher
United States
Joined: Apr 29, 2007
Post Count: 1187
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: work unit finished in 0.0 hours
No, keep it connected. Your system runs much faster if you have one of those. You must not have it hooked up correctly since you should get the results before you start processing. Someone put one in their car and tested it here at the shopping mall near my house several years ago.

Cheers coffee
----------------------------------------
[Nov 24, 2013 5:24:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
armstrdj
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Oct 21, 2004
Post Count: 695
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: work unit finished in 0.0 hours
littlepeaks,

Looks like a workunit issue. I will investiage and let you know what happened.

Thanks,
armstrdj
[Dec 2, 2013 4:07:40 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: work unit finished in 0.0 hours
Jonathan, FWIW, have had multiple MCM that ran for 5 seconds. Rounding on the Result Status page makes numbers turn 0.00 on time and credit, but together with wingman they do validate.
[Dec 2, 2013 4:29:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread