Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 44
Posts: 44   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 12520 times and has 43 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crazy Points

Hey everyone,

There are a few things going on, some of the members who are claiming X points but getting Y is due to how they are calculated. Each task for CEP2 has 15 jobs within it. Say you are able to complete all 15 but your wingman is only able to complete the first one, this would cause the credit to be higher in your favor generally. This project is different then the others because it gives credit based on jobs completed which may not always match between two wingman.

We are currently working on upgrading the backend server code, which would change the way credit is granted. Since this is coming down the pipe in the future, our priority is to get it out the door first. As many of you know, I can not give a timetable on that, but I can tell you we are testing it now.

Thank you for your patience.

-Uplinger


Hi Uplinger.

My CEP2 tasks that got low credits did not have a wingman!
This is a new problem for me, it only started with the new longer run times. The other projects don't have this problem.

Like this one!

E218825_ 103_ I.51.C38H24N6O7.00012726.0.set1d06_ 0-- Black-AMD-X6 Valid 1/14/14 06:34:35 1/16/14 02:30:18 18.00 / 18.56 87.4 / 87.4
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 17, 2014 5:51:30 AM]
[Jan 17, 2014 3:12:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
branjo
Master Cruncher
Slovakia
Joined: Jun 29, 2012
Post Count: 1892
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crazy Points

Another funnies:

E218855_ 835_ I.55.C38F4H14N8O4S.00180905.0.set1d06_ 2-- 640 Valid 16.1.2014 12:31:21 17.1.2014 01:02:40 7.90 102.0 / 102.0 <== finished 12 of 15 jobs
E218855_ 835_ I.55.C38F4H14N8O4S.00180905.0.set1d06_ 1-- 640 Error 16.1.2014 12:06:21 16.1.2014 12:23:17 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
E218855_ 835_ I.55.C38F4H14N8O4S.00180905.0.set1d06_ 0-- 640 Invalid 15.1.2014 23:58:11 16.1.2014 11:43:49 9.32 308.4 / 27.5 <== me, finished 5 jobs of 15

E218850_ 562_ I.52.C47H23N5.00049890.1.set1d06_ 1-- 640 Valid 16.1.2014 12:05:06 17.1.2014 07:23:29 12.91 102.0 / 102.0 <== finished 12 of 15 jobs
E218850_ 562_ I.52.C47H23N5.00049890.1.set1d06_ 0-- 640 Valid 15.1.2014 16:44:38 16.1.2014 11:31:40 15.80 510.0 / 102.0 <== me, also finished 12 jobs of 15
----------------------------------------

Crunching@Home since January 13 2000. Shrubbing@Home since January 5 2006

[Jan 17, 2014 9:06:44 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crazy Points

Hi.

Forgive me if I missed something, but aren't we suppose to to be able to do 16 jobs per tasks that was why time runtime was increased.

Apart from the low credits per task were getting now as well. And this was a solo task again, so the credit claim is what it is.

This is a i7 2700k running at 3.9ghz.

E218901_ 208_ J.49.C42H22N4S2Se.00036462.2.set1d06_ 0-- 640 Valid 1/18/14 20:39:27 1/19/14 12:11:59 9.71 120.0 / 120.0



15:40:00] Starting job 12,CPU time has been restored to 24368.878955.
[15:40:00] Starting new Job
[15:40:00] Qink name = fldman
[15:40:10] Qink name = gesman
[15:40:13] Qink name = scfman
Application exited with RC = 0x100
[18:39:11] Finished Job #12
[18:39:11] Starting job 13,CPU time has been restored to 34716.797659.
[18:39:11] Skipping Job #13
[18:39:11] Starting job 14,CPU time has been restored to 34716.797659.
[18:39:11] Skipping Job #14
[18:39:11] Starting job 15,CPU time has been restored to 34716.797659.
[18:39:11] Skipping Job #15
18:39:26 (6085): called boinc_finish

</stderr_txt>
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 19, 2014 8:36:27 PM]
[Jan 19, 2014 8:35:10 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Thyme Lawn
Cruncher
Joined: Dec 9, 2008
Post Count: 46
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crazy Points

The credit claim for my last pair of CEP2 tasks has increased by a factor of more than 7. The following 4 tasks are currently listed for my C2Q XP SP3 system:

E218724_225_I.51.C43H19N7O.00191454.3.set1d06_2-- Pending Validation 11/01/14 11:06:34 12/01/14 15:30:35 18.00 / 19.12 64.9 / 0.0
E218793_602_I.52.C47H20N4O.00065026.0.set1d06_0-- Pending Validation 12/01/14 15:30:35 13/01/14 05:19:53 11.92 / 12.61 71.2 / 0.0
E218772_045_I.52.C45H19N7.00057989.2.set1d06_2-- Pending Validation 16/01/14 15:42:52 18/01/14 23:15:11 16.13 / 17.05 555.2 / 0.0
E218887_900_J.51.C39H18N6O4S2.00035718.0.set1d06_0-- Valid 17/01/14 21:31:50 19/01/14 17:03:25 14.73 / 15.54 549.3 / 549.3

Edit: all 4 of the tasks were killed during job #12.
----------------------------------------
"The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world that it leaves to its children." - Dietrich Bonhoeffer
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Thyme Lawn at Jan 19, 2014 10:51:54 PM]
[Jan 19, 2014 10:48:57 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: May 23, 2005
Post Count: 3952
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crazy Points

We will be taking a more in depth look at the new credit system when it is live. Please be patient as we work towards releasing the new code.

Thanks,
-Uplinger
[Jan 20, 2014 3:37:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crazy Points

Thanks uplinger! Not much we can do from the project end, I'm afraid.
Best wishes,
Your CEP team
[Jan 20, 2014 5:44:45 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crazy Points

Hi.
Not even getting an average now a days, any E.T.A. on getting this project back to normal. confused

E218978_ 740_ I.51.C42H19N7OS.00081562.1.set1d06_ 2-- 640 Valid 1/23/14 23:58:05 1/24/14 20:59:22 8.94 159.1 / 159.1 ---- ME.
E218978_ 740_ I.51.C42H19N7OS.00081562.1.set1d06_ 1-- 640 Valid 1/23/14 18:01:52 1/24/14 19:32:07 9.47 502.5 / 159.1
[Jan 24, 2014 9:04:35 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
3rkko
Advanced Cruncher
Finland
Joined: Aug 2, 2008
Post Count: 105
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crazy Points

This is not funny!

11.45h / 11.73h, 564.7p / 564.7p
15.91h / 16.25h, 71.2p / 71.2p
etc...

very inconsistent. And my credits are dropping after switching back to CEP2, after getting a sapphire at MCM. But I like this project more. Please fix the credits.
----------------------------------------

[Jan 25, 2014 2:12:50 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crazy Points

bonjour.
moi aussi les points ne sont pas à la mesure du temp passé, comparé aux autres projets dans un même laps de temp.
je stop CEP !
[Jan 26, 2014 8:17:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
ccandido
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Jun 22, 2011
Post Count: 182
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Crazy Points

I have read in another thread that if you run sufficient wu the server stops sending wu that require a wingman and the points granted will then be equal to the points claimed.

I am not sure whether this is correct.

Another problems with this is that I should perhaps be getting wu without a wingman since I have a saphire in this project (total 2 years cruching).

Can someone clarify this? Thanks
----------------------------------------


[Mar 29, 2014 4:55:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 44   Pages: 5   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread