Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 58
Posts: 58   Pages: 6   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 7458 times and has 57 replies Next Thread
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7697
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

BOINC Manager at least should be able to adjust its estimates. When a task shows 50% completed with only 8 minutes elapsed, and the estimated time remaining is 2 hours, it shouldn't take a lot of AI to make a correction.


I wholeheartedly agree on that point.

Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Jun 26, 2014 2:49:31 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
asdavid
Veteran Cruncher
FRANCE
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 521
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

BOINC Manager at least should be able to adjust its estimates. When a task shows 50% completed with only 8 minutes elapsed, and the estimated time remaining is 2 hours, it shouldn't take a lot of AI to make a correction.


I wholeheartedly agree on that point.

Cheers


This is something i noticed when installing the new version of the manager (7.2.47). It took much more time to adjust remaining times than the old 6.x.x one.
----------------------------------------
Anne-Sophie

[Jun 26, 2014 10:43:51 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1323
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

BOINC Manager at least should be able to adjust its estimates. When a task shows 50% completed with only 8 minutes elapsed, and the estimated time remaining is 2 hours, it shouldn't take a lot of AI to make a correction.

I wholeheartedly agree on that point.

Cheers

This is something i noticed when installing the new version of the manager (7.2.47). It took much more time to adjust remaining times than the old 6.x.x one.

World Community Grid decided not to use BOINC's duration_correction_factor and therefore that factor is always 1.000000.
So BOINC fully depends on the estimated time for the tasks that it get from the WCG-project.

CP
[Jun 26, 2014 11:41:06 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
rbotterb
Senior Cruncher
United States
Joined: Jul 21, 2005
Post Count: 401
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

If you find your running less than a full number of WUs for your system, you can always in a short term change the perferences to a larger number and force a task update. You'll get can usually get a bunch of extra WUs to crunch while afterwards you put your perference level back to where it was before. Now this if obviously rather manual, but it can get more WUs to your system if you want them (and assuming there are WUs out there to download in the first place).
[Jun 27, 2014 1:07:07 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
l_mckeon
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Post Count: 439
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

If you find your running less than a full number of WUs for your system, you can always in a short term change the preferences to a larger number and force a task update. You'll get can usually get a bunch of extra WUs to crunch while afterwards you put your preference level back to where it was before.
Are you sure? While I haven't tried changing my preferences, with a fairly empty queue and forcing an update, I think I still only get three tasks at a time.
[Jun 28, 2014 1:58:18 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sean0118
Cruncher
Australia
Joined: Feb 7, 2010
Post Count: 33
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

Do you mean under special circumstances? I just increased my cache a bit and got 16 new tasks.
[Jun 28, 2014 8:16:18 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

with a fairly empty queue and forcing an update, I think I still only get three tasks at a time.


If you double your minimum cache buffer setting, you should get more than just the three.
[Jun 28, 2014 11:51:26 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 774
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

Are you sure? While I haven't tried changing my preferences, with a fairly empty queue and forcing an update, I think I still only get three tasks at a time.


You may still only get 3 per call but can update again for more, up to buffer prefs.
Tasks per call seems to differ per BOINC level and CPU speed.

Paul.
----------------------------------------
Paul.
[Jun 28, 2014 12:52:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

Iirc, the newer agents will fetch a task or two even if work is not needed, does say so if that's the case in the event log! This is simply to not let a server rpc call go to waste. How often you can do this hitting of 'update', until the agent tells you to go climb a tree i do not know. The cpdn project have for those heavy keyboard pounders a 3636 second enforced backoff. The wcg 121 seconds is by comparison benign, but still a whole lot more than the 7 seconds that simap tells you to exercise patience.

For those not afraid to read, i mean read a few more log lines, you can add the sched_op_debug tag to the cc_config.xml. Then when hitting update you get actual feedback on how many seconds of work are requested and how many seconds are given. Standard seconds as it is as noted based on a frozen dcf of 1 for version 7 agents.

2751017 Default

106764 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:39 PM update requested by user
106765 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:43 PM sched RPC pending: Requested by user
106766 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:43 PM [sched_op] Starting scheduler request
106767 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:43 PM Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
106768 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:43 PM Not requesting tasks: don't need (zero resource share)
106769 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:43 PM [sched_op] CPU work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices
106770 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:46 PM Scheduler request completed
106771 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:46 PM [sched_op] Server version 701
106772 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:46 PM Project requested delay of 121 seconds
106773 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:46 PM [sched_op] Deferring communication for 00:02:01
106774 World Community Grid 6/28/2014 4:08:46 PM [sched_op] Reason: requested by project
[Jun 28, 2014 2:15:27 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
l_mckeon
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Post Count: 439
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very shorts wus

The point was if you've got an empty queue and they're only sending you three at a time, it can take half an hour or more to restock with short WUs. Bad design, and it didn't used to do that.
[Jun 29, 2014 9:41:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 58   Pages: 6   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread