Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 18
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Seoulpowergrid
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Apr 12, 2013 Post Count: 817 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My scientific knowledge limit is at Mythbusters level. But knowing that my computer being on helps the scientific community makes me happy as I am contributing to the effort. :)
----------------------------------------If the smart people continue programming I'll keep my computer active in assisting. ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thanks--one of the best updates (in content and format) in memory. If possible to ask questions of the experimenters, I'm wondering:
----------------------------------------1. Do other filoviruses--or other Type V viruses--enter cells using similar means as described for Ebola? That is, could a drug that blocks the receptor-binding site of the Ebola GP also be expected to block entry for any other pathogens? 2. If the function of the Lassa virus nucleoprotein could be blunted by a drug in the way described in the update, it seems that taking such a drug would still require the infected person to get very sick with Lassa (albeit clearly less sick than without) and clear the virus through normal immune means, which at best will still require public health expenditures and at worst could still result in death for immunocompromised or co-infected folks. Could Lassa's entry into the cell in the first place be blocked in a way similar to what you are looking at with Ebola? Keep up the great work for the species! ![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at May 8, 2015 2:19:34 AM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Thanks for helping with the project!
All the filoviruses (Ebola, Sudan, Marburg, Bundibugyo, Reston, Lloviu, etc.) seem to enter the same way using the same receptor. So you are correct that a drug that blocks entry could be broadly reactive against the whole family of pathogens. For your second question, we would just need to know that a person is infected with Lassa to use an antiviral against it - they don;t necessarily need to be in an advanced stage of the disease. Now, on a practical level, many patients may not seek treatment until it's clear that this is something more serious than the fever and headache it began with. Rapid, simple diagnosis is key. We are also working with Corgenix, Tulane, Zalgen and Autoimmune to develop rapid diagnostics for these diseases. This work is through the Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Consortium vhfc.org These tests work like pregnancy tests in that you have the answer in five minutes: two red lines it's Lassa or Ebola or whatever the test is for, one red line means it's soemething else. It works with a drop of blood from a fingerprick and does not need electricity. You can see how a fiev minute, inexpensive, no electricity, simple, field-stable diagnostic could do a lot of good in identifying cases, getting them treatment, and preventing single cases from expanding into multiple cases and an outbreak. The Ebola version of the diagnostic was approved under an emergency use authorization by the FDA in February and there are lots of them in Sierra Leone now. The Lassa version was developed before the Ebola version (because Lassa is endemic) and works the same way. The last part of your question is that yes, we think Lassa entry can be blocked, but that would be a different drug because the Lassa surface glycoprotein is quite different form that of Ebola. It uses a different receptor. Studying the entry process of Lassa and developing therapeutic antibodies to treat Lassa infection is another goal of the consortium. Thanks for your help with the project! Erica |
||
|
[CSF] Thomas Dupont
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Aug 25, 2013 Post Count: 685 Status: Offline |
Thanks Erica for taking the time to answer the questions
----------------------------------------![]() Really appreciated! |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Wow, exciting! Thanks so much for the reply!
![]() |
||
|
littlepeaks
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 748 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My questions and comments:
Is there a way to identify the llasa wus, to differentiate them from the ebola ones? I read the article about llasa, and one of the things that caught my attention is the manganese atom. Any idea how how llasa gloms on to these to create copies of itself? Manganese is a trace element in the body. There is currently no RDA. Adequate intake (AI) for men is 2.3 mg a day. (That is smaller than a small piece of dust). Over 11 mg will cause adverse effects. Would it be worthwhile to examine if a way to stop the virus' uptake of manganese is possible? There are artificial radioisotopes of manganese available, but don't know if the different MWs of these would adversely affect the chemistry for experiments. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
It could also be magnesium.
|
||
|
pGioldasis
Cruncher USA Joined: Oct 29, 2006 Post Count: 5 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The D.N.A of a human is around Planet
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() [Edit 4 times, last edit by pGioldasis at Jun 16, 2015 3:17:38 AM] |
||
|
|
![]() |