Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 6
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1468 times and has 5 replies Next Thread
Eric_Kaiser
Veteran Cruncher
Germany (Hessen)
Joined: May 7, 2013
Post Count: 1047
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Strange validation of wu with 0 CPU-time

I have several wu where my computers have a really long runtime (close to 10 hrs instead of the usual ~5 hrs).
These wu were all valid but received low credit. A deeper look at these wu reveiled that the wingman had CPU time of 0 (zero) and therefore a low credit.

But my real sorrow is: How can the wingman return those wu as valid?

Example:
MCM1_0022002_4573
MCM1_0022002_4035
MCM1_0022002_3371
----------------------------------------

[Apr 11, 2016 9:23:25 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Strange validation of wu with 0 CPU-time

Not the first time the CPU or Elapsed got lost in hyperspace, but otherwise these tasks' output is valid. Yes it blows the lid on credit, but then, what's [Credit]new ;o)

BTW, what are the client version / OS combo's of those wingman?

Edit: Oh, we had a strange credit event lasting several days for MCM right after the server out on the 7th [when techs fixed the download stuck issue, again]. See https://bit.ly/WCGMCM1. The underlying credit statistics seems to heavily overreact to greater than small changes. [No point in expounding on the matter rolling eyes ].
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at Apr 11, 2016 9:37:14 AM]
[Apr 11, 2016 9:35:27 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Eric_Kaiser
Veteran Cruncher
Germany (Hessen)
Joined: May 7, 2013
Post Count: 1047
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Strange validation of wu with 0 CPU-time

Here is one wu more detailled:

Result Name OS type OS version App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
MCM1_ 0022002_ 4573_ 1-- Linux 3.13.0-46-generic 736 Valid 06.04.16 06:27:39 11.04.16 08:25:39 9.78 122.8 / 83.7
MCM1_ 0022002_ 4573_ 0-- Linux 3.2.0-56-virtual 736 Valid 06.04.16 06:26:43 06.04.16 14:44:43 0.00 44.6 / 83.7

My result is the blue line.
----------------------------------------

[Apr 11, 2016 12:09:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Strange validation of wu with 0 CPU-time

Looks like your wingman is running quite an old Linux, in a virtual environment at that. Result log would reveal the client version that device has/had.
[Apr 11, 2016 12:30:12 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Eric_Kaiser
Veteran Cruncher
Germany (Hessen)
Joined: May 7, 2013
Post Count: 1047
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Strange validation of wu with 0 CPU-time

The result log of my wingman starts with:
<core_client_version>7.5.0</core_client_version>
----------------------------------------

[Apr 11, 2016 1:41:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Strange validation of wu with 0 CPU-time

That is the number of the very first alpha build towards 7.6 beta and public release versions.
[Apr 11, 2016 2:04:54 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread