I'm still trying to figure out how points, etc., are computed. For example, on my HomeBrewers team, we have three members with the following stats (I did the best I could to tabulate the data):

#__TOTAL RUN TIME___POINTS GENERATED___RESULTS RETURNED
1___0:009:06:52:24_________2,789________________2
2___0:003:06:31:11__________929_________________1
3___0:000:06:59:38__________209________________69

I understand the disparity in results, because that depends upon the length of the task your computer works on, and there is obviously no correlation between results returned and points. If there were, then #3, above, should be much higher in points. But I thought there was a relationship between run-time and points; that seems to be so when looking at #1 and #2, where they are both in approximatel ratio of 3:1. However, when looking at run-time for #2 and #3, assuming 24 hours in a day, #2 has eleven times as much run-time as #3, but only a little over 4 times the points. Is that because #3 was lucky enough to be assigned a huge number of very short tasks?

Thanks.

Bill Velek