| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Support
Forum: BOINC Agent Support
Thread: CPU Benchmarks (what does it mean/where do I rank) |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 71
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
G'Day Sekerob
The key word for the team members is "active" and the UD site membership seems in order for Australia, including my own profile which does all go to Australia stats. The BOINC team however, only four members, is listed as International and I am also the only active member there atm. My Boinc stats also are attributed to Aus. and all of the members have a little Aussie flag next to their names, so I'm no closer to understanding that. I guess whoever started that team would be the only one who might be able to fix it. If I ever get anywhere near Moomba I'll say Hi for you  Highly unlikely as that may be. I was only a couple of hundred clicks from there a couple of years ago when I was "tent touring" the Eastern States in my car but have since taken a respite in Mildura near the junction of South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales, just on the edge of the Simpson desert whiich in fact stretches, via the Strezeleki and Great Stoney Deserts to Moomba but is roughly 1500KM from here and as I am using this time to get physically fit and equip a bicycle for continuing my journey I seriously have no plans to pedal through that particular part of the country.  If you're talking to your mate, you'll have to ask him if he's thinking of progressing to Emu riding? They're much more energetic through the day than the Kangaroos are and far more tasty if you get stuck short of a feed  Not that Roo meat isn't yummy too.Cheers ozylynx |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
WCG ignore the option for tagging a team with a country. Frankly, I agree: why be restrictive?
Amazing how many people cut up rough on the subject, though. Who'da thought a flag was so important? |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Ozylynx, .....there's a way to get the national flag to fly for a Team in the BOINC stats.....just look at the "Dutch Power Cows" a.k.a. DPC...looks like establishing a roll up into which WCG contributions are included .....key seems to be team name consistency....only 2 of the 28 DPC team branches still to align @ Seti and Climate Control....exact mechanics to be discovered
---------------------------------------- http://nl.boincstats.com/search/result.php ciao
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Amazing how many people cut up rough on the subject, though. Who'da thought a flag was so important? Oh Captian, my Captain.. I note, by your sig, that the team you created seems to instill some pride and a rather handsome display on your part. Who could figure such things? Cheers ozylynx |
||
|
|
XS_Martijn
Cruncher Joined: Aug 27, 2006 Post Count: 17 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I wish I'm not so childish as you pointed out... Every project would throw out the system if they switched platform from BOINC to another. But will it happen? Not 0%, but hardly. Anyway here is my result: PenD 2.8GHz Presler + 1GB RAM
|| Number of CPUs: 2 || 1407 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU || 1561 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU ||Finished CPU benchmarks This is what I get with my Pentium D 2.8 Smithfield (@3.4, gazillion apps running in background as well): 29-8-2006 23:15:49|| Number of CPUs: 2 29-8-2006 23:15:49|| 3751 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 29-8-2006 23:15:49|| 13199 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 29-8-2006 23:15:49||Finished CPU benchmarks Or else, that score is not what it should, or can be ;) |
||
|
|
XS_Martijn
Cruncher Joined: Aug 27, 2006 Post Count: 17 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I wish I'm not so childish as you pointed out... Every project would throw out the system if they switched platform from BOINC to another. But will it happen? Not 0%, but hardly. Anyway here is my result: PenD 2.8GHz Presler + 1GB RAM
|| Number of CPUs: 2 || 1407 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU || 1561 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU ||Finished CPU benchmarks This is what I get with my Pentium D 2.8 Smithfield (@3.4, gazillion apps running in background as well): 29-8-2006 23:15:49|| Number of CPUs: 2 29-8-2006 23:15:49|| 3751 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 29-8-2006 23:15:49|| 13199 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 29-8-2006 23:15:49||Finished CPU benchmarks Or else, that score is not what it should, or can be ;) What I forgot to add: my P3 1Ghz scores higher than that |
||
|
|
Phill23
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jan 3, 2006 Post Count: 59 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Here's my AMD X2 4600+ @ 2.74Ghz results:
2612 floating point MIPS (whetstone) per CPU 4874 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU Cant understand why they are so different tho... My AMD 64 3200+ (standard clock) 06/01/2007 16:58:22||Benchmark results: 06/01/2007 16:58:22|| Number of CPUs: 1 06/01/2007 16:58:22|| 1853 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 06/01/2007 16:58:22|| 3450 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 06/01/2007 16:58:22||Finished CPU benchmarks My Intel Conroe E6600 @ 3.24Ghz Number of CPUs: 2 2991 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 6247 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU Managed to get the Intel to post and boot into windows (and its fairly stable at that the speed too) 3.61Ghz which I'm very pleased at. I just needed better cooling to run it at full load (each core) as it was rather warm at that speed with the retail heatsink... Results to follow when I get that sorted  |
||
|
|
retsof
Former Community Advisor USA Joined: Jul 31, 2005 Post Count: 6824 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
What does it mean? Since a dual core can run two separate programs, the benchmark is just for one side, I would think. He needs to fire up TWO BOINCs, if he hasn't done that already.I would have thought your benchmarks would be higher than mine because yours is dual core whereas mine is single. So it looks to me like BOINC is reporting the numbers for just 1 core or perhaps totalling the results from the 2 cores and dividing by 2. In that case, my benchmarks would be higher than yours because my processor runs faster. Here's an AMD64 single core at 2.4GHz: 1/6/2007 7:34:09 AM||Processor: 1 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 4000+ 1/6/2007 7:34:09 AM||Memory: 3.00 GB physical, 4.34 GB virtual 1/6/2007 7:34:09 AM||Disk: 186.30 GB total, 164.42 GB free 1/6/2007 2:13:03 PM||Running CPU benchmarks 1/6/2007 2:14:02 PM||Benchmark results: 1/6/2007 2:14:02 PM|| Number of CPUs: 1 1/6/2007 2:14:02 PM|| 2315 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 1/6/2007 2:14:02 PM|| 4201 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 1/6/2007 2:14:02 PM||Finished CPU benchmarks The story of this other machine was more interesting. It started out as a Dell Intel 1.7GHz with some problems. I had a computer store transmogrify it into a 2.0GHz AMD64 with a new mobo and cabinet, while reusing some of the stock components. It is overclocked to 2.4GHz. The new Venice core at this speed runs a lot cooler than the above older machine at standard speed. The benchmark ends up being almost the same. 12/24/2006 9:03:35 AM||Processor: 1 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ 12/24/2006 9:03:35 AM||Memory: 511.23 MB physical, 1.22 GB virtual 12/24/2006 9:03:35 AM||Disk: 186.30 GB total, 181.30 GB free 1/6/2007 3:37:28 PM||Running CPU benchmarks 1/6/2007 3:38:27 PM||Benchmark results: 1/6/2007 3:38:27 PM|| Number of CPUs: 1 1/6/2007 3:38:27 PM|| 2273 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 1/6/2007 3:38:27 PM|| 4201 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 1/6/2007 3:38:27 PM||Finished CPU benchmarks
SUPPORT ADVISOR
----------------------------------------Work+GPU i7 8700 12threads School i7 4770 8threads Default+GPU Ryzen 7 3700X 16threads Ryzen 7 3800X 16 threads Ryzen 9 3900X 24threads Home i7 3540M 4threads50% [Edit 3 times, last edit by retsof at Jan 6, 2007 9:48:41 PM] |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Dont' quite follow. The benchmark is only needed for and on one core. Suppose u get a rating of 10 per CPU hour (Sum of Whet- + Dhry-stone = 4800 / 480), running BOINC on 2 cores gets payment claim of 20 per hour i.a.w. as if the overall benchmark is 9600.
----------------------------------------The AMD64 does an equivalent per core of 13.57.... would it have been a dual core, payment claim would be 27.14 credit per CPU hour. It's entirely up to the individual to specify the number of cores to use in his/her profile and get either 50 or 100% 'capacity' out of a dual core.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
cio_redulla
Advanced Cruncher Philippines Joined: Apr 24, 2006 Post Count: 130 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I'm using BOINC 5.8.2 (Win XP) on a Pentium D 945 (3.4GHz, stock speed). Not spectacular. I envy the AMD benchmarks, hehehe!
----------------------------------------1/12/2007 11:24:56 AM||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks 1/12/2007 11:24:58 AM||Running CPU benchmarks 1/12/2007 11:25:57 AM||Benchmark results: 1/12/2007 11:25:57 AM|| Number of CPUs: 2 1/12/2007 11:25:57 AM|| 1700 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU 1/12/2007 11:25:57 AM|| 2750 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU 1/12/2007 11:25:58 AM||Resuming computation  |
||
|
|
|