#1 - zero
#2 - less than 20
#3 - more than 1000

I know number 1 is right and I am guessing the others.

In China, it must be 1000-10000/year. In addition, their coal mine fires contribute 1% of their carbon emissions.

close enough...


It gets weirder. Coal, smoke from combusion and fly ash from coal plants have residual radioactivity of their own. Concrete block made from fly ash can be a source of radon gas.

http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/1997/fs163-97/FS-163-97.html

Let me ask this, is there a structure on earth that could stand for as long enough to store any nuclear materials for its half-life?

None! Nor can we.

The reasons why I know this is for a reason I cant admit to. What I can say is that proliferation of nuclear materials equals proliferation of nuclear weapons.

Now for D, as he may have missed my explanation of the jet pilots conversation:



Governments that have a hair up their behind, can act like children. We have one in office right now.


Like Bush.

A jet pilot being contacted in flight. The control code "Tiger Alpha" idents the communication as authentic.

The pilots responds to the authentication.

The mission controller asking if he sees the cask.

He says yes and that he has acquired the target for laser guidance. Then asks for attack orders. The "vector" is the approach angle and attitude prescribed for that sortie.

The controller says no. Then tells the pilot to "hang around a bit" to wait for the train to get up wind of a city.

The pilot accepts the communication as a direct command. Then confirms the order.

The controller confirms and clears the channel.

The F-117 can carry two laser-guided bombs so accurate, that they can go through not just the window of your choice, but which pane. The first would crack that cask in two. The second would be an incendiary. Well, to insure maximum possible tactical yield. Why? Because its his job, not that he would want to personally cause such horror.

The "3 for 1 sale" remark, that may be taken as zeal, is actually identifying the 3 tactical levels of assault. It is to reconfirm that the pilot and controller are absolutely sure before proceeding, as they both need to be sure for themselves before releasing such destruction.

The reason why I said it this way, using the military communication style, is to drive home a point, not to tic you off. The part that isn’t obvious is the lack of the direct use of the word “cask”. This is to protect the communication, so if you don’t know what’s up you wont understand. Giving the pilot better chances, preventing discovery while loitering.

7cures:

Courine:

RTB ETA, Return to base estimated time of arrival. SOD, supression of defense forces. He is saying he will tell the controller that if he sees anything worth blowing up, he will get back to them on it.


Anyone getting the picture yet?

You read want you want to read. You hear what you want to hear. Did you even read my post, no. 70,000 is not just the death rate. It's also includes the slow malingering illnesses as well. You know, the ones that leave you praying for death.

The part you don’t get, is you cant have war and nuclear materials in the same world. This is not my idea, it has been known for years. Top minds on the planet have been trying to figure out how to get out of the mess ever since. A mess that you want to promote. WHY? Because you are so behind in the thinking needed to know quite how far off you are.

Having this conversation in this forum is from a political agenda only. One built on hype that would prey on the ignorant only. As your future in this is my distant past.

Oh Dave,

Do you know how raindrops form?

And D,

70,000/25=2800. But remember, that is per year, not just last year. It was the predicted total casulaties shortly after the disaster.

Do you want to know how to unsmelt nuclear materials?