Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 48
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I've also had extremely low points allowance for this project. It may be worthwhile the powers that be looking into the problem. C'mon, guys, no one wants to crunch WUs for absolutely nothing. The points etc may not be worth a lite in real term but, it all amounts to incentive.
![]() |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
The one with the 4.85 hours is in all probability invalid. That's why there's a beta test going, for those who want to know. If that's solved the main discrepancy in claims/credit should go away.
----------------------------------------
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Dec 16, 2008 4:28:28 PM] |
||
|
KLM_Nederlands
Cruncher Joined: Apr 26, 2007 Post Count: 14 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Project Name: The Clean Energy Project
Created: 12/5/08 Name: E000025_784A_00034r002 Minimum Quorum: 2 Initial Replication: 2 Result Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit E000025_ 784A_ 00034r002_ 0-- Valid 12/13/08 14:23:00 12/14/08 21:25:06 3.61 36.4 / 36.4 E000025_ 784A_ 00034r002_ 1-- Valid 12/13/08 14:20:44 12/16/08 03:14:48 42.01 397.6 / 36.4 Mine was the one that ran for 42.01 hours. Leo |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
The time given for unstarted work is an estimate only. The final time shown on the client for completed work should match the website. Uncertainty in the actual times for CEP means that the estimates are often misleading. The time estimation algorithm simply can't predict what is essentially random. That's my point, it does not. Real time work is 48-50 hours, but I'm only seeing 24 hours credited at most, and 10% of claimed points. |
||
|
jkislenko
Advanced Cruncher Czech Republic Joined: Mar 29, 2007 Post Count: 62 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I dont mind that much. Good, some more Betas..
![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
WU: E000027_069A_00035l00r
----------------------------------------E000027_ 069A_ 00035l00r_ 0-- Valid 12/13/08 23:01:26 12/14/08 09:53:55 0.27 5.9 / 5.9 E000027_ 069A_ 00035l00r_ 1-- Valid 12/13/08 23:01:07 12/16/08 19:41:35 37.47 580.2 / 5.9 </me It's a little strange. I crunch almost 40h for this? ![]() My computer: E6600 (2,4 GHz) + 2GB RAM. [Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Dec 17, 2008 6:30:15 AM] |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Hi,
----------------------------------------It's much easier for me to copy my own post and change a number The one with the 0.27 hours is in all probability invalid. That's why there's a beta test going, for those who want to know. If that's solved the main discrepancy in claims/credit should go away!
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
![]() Very generous ![]() |
||
|
ziegenmelker
Cruncher Joined: Feb 4, 2007 Post Count: 13 Status: Offline |
I've been hit too:
The resultwas done on a AMD X2@3,2GHz Linux box running the Windows app in a VMware session. More than 24 h for almost nothing. :( |
||
|
nasher
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Dec 2, 2005 Post Count: 1423 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
yes that is one of the reasons that there have been more beta work units for CEP released to see if we can figure out the issue causeing some of the work units to fail but validate a short run time
----------------------------------------you could select beta projects and help also heck worse case is its another badge ![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
![]() |