littlepeaks

Don't believe a word some of those names that Sekerob openly dismisses are true hero's holding Climate "science" up to the light so we can weigh the evidence (or lack of it) for ourselves

Where would we be without the McIntyre's of this world?

Not a nice thought

Keep on crunching while we still can


Dave

Just mentioned the most mind-numbing types and entirely unsure how Dr Roy Spencer or Dr. John Christy would feel about having been listed amongst that assortment... bad reflection on the profession.

Now Dr. Roy is definitely a fav. of mine because his data matches the data quite closely of Dr. Hansen [not in that list] who does the equivalent sat reading published [RSS], and when one plays with Fourier, Slowess filters, linear regression and whatnot we/me comes up with this little gem:



Put a little black circle left bottom and a grey halo right top, but the star is a 38 month moving average, the yellow line and dips, but its up again, way ahead of the suns cycle 24 kick-in. We know down here in the Med what ENSO teleconnection does to the climate. There is this odd ~7 year flux... up a bit, flat, down a bit, more up, flat, down a bit, and up it goes again, but the flats always on a higher plain. This cycle is totally and utterly divorced from the solar cycle and low/behold even when the sun remained century record low for 2 years, it continued.

The Monckton's and Ball's would need a transplant to see it, but I'm sure David Authumns can... admit it, no cooling anywhere, not even in the most snow whitest dreams.

Wait until HADCRU is done with auditing if there data was tempered/tampered with after the UEA break-in, for then the below chart, made in the UK, will show the full 12 months of 2009, and it's not the sun.



Here my expectation, 7 years gone since the extreme months long heatwave of 2003 that caused the loss of 40 centimeters of Mediterranean sea level, that never returned in full since. 2010 will be scorching hot. That's what I expect, and then it will be reported as the weather at the beginning of a new decade.

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/people...stones-20100210-ns83.html

People who don't want to live in glass houses should throw stones February 11, 2010

Dont see much Blackness on the bottom of your feet David.

I've had thick insulating boards fixed to the outide walls here and the whole lot fire proofed plastered then pebble dashed. My loft space is well insulated and I even had insulating boards put underneath the tiles of the roof. Every light bulb in the house is low energy and has been for years. Glazing is good. Heating is efficient. I make my own compost and grow a lot of my own food. I recycle everything I can. I walk when it is daft to take the car. I like walking anyway. I dont eat cows. etc, etc, etc.

None of this is because of some fad, or in response to junk science from the IPCC. It is because these are sensible things to do.

I'm still a bad person though it would seem, if I dont follow the herd.

The less well off all over the world are suffering based on the decisions taken due to all of this global warming hype.

Visitors later, then off to see my local football team win again (I hope).

and now to pop downstairs into the basement where the glass, the paper and the carton's tin's and plastic's recycling bins live right alongside the communal garage where I don't have a car

Finally treated myself to one of these

http://products.amd.com/en-us/DesktopCPUDetai...11=&f12=True&f13=

I need to get back on my horse, I have taken quite a pummelling over the last few years.

So I'm going to find out how much you can do with less. I'll set up a new green computing challenge thread once I have gathered all of the bits together - don't hold your breath though....it might be a while.

I have just the CPU and Mobo on their way


Dave