Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 388
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Zigfried
Senior Cruncher Brazil Joined: Dec 12, 2005 Post Count: 368 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you for the information :)
----------------------------------------![]() |
||
|
KerSamson
Master Cruncher Switzerland Joined: Jan 29, 2007 Post Count: 1677 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The mean runtime is still a "mean time".
----------------------------------------My hosts are still experiencing troubles with a large variability of the real runtime (between 2 and 8 hours, sometime 10 hours) which put the queue up-side-down. I reduced several times the cache size but it does not really help and I have from time to time overdue WUs because Boinc is not able to perform a meaningful management of priority ![]() Cheers, Yves |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Yves, think you're beating horse, dead so long, the earthworms have digested the last remains. The cache setting workaround has always been to give it a small enough value to not inflate the total cache over 10 days... 2 to 8 hours is divisor 4 i.e 1 or 2 days setting would hardly cause any task to not make it in time when DCF trundles between 0.25 and 4.00 where up is instant and down is slowly so as to prevent over-buffering. In case repairs get assigned, the client is programmed to automatically put them ahead if not making their 4 day deadline. The more variable, the smaller the recommended cache/buffer setting is.
Whilst, knreed could disable the DCF value that is signaled by a client with server version 700, except FTM he's decided against the mechanism as currently implemented. Can't remember why... the mix of old and new clients could be a drawback. What I know of the new client is [observed multiple times whilst continuously running latest test versions], that if the minimum work buffer is set equal or greater than half the shortest deadline time, high priority management kicks in... EDF. Don't like it, but that's the only way to actually have multiple days cache, as the MaxAB does not get filled in full, because WCG [only] gives maximum of 30 WU's per fetch call which is usually enough to lift the buffer above MinB. Else, if the crippled horse needs beating, join the alpha mail list and report your concerns/findings to the client developers at Berkeley's Alpha Mail list. Few over-there seem to speak for WCG. |
||
|
NixChix
Veteran Cruncher United States Joined: Apr 29, 2007 Post Count: 1187 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I suspended crunching on other projects to help wrap up HCMD. Is there any indication as to how much is left to do here?
----------------------------------------![]() Cheers ![]() ![]() |
||
|
cehunt
Senior Cruncher CANADA Joined: Oct 10, 2011 Post Count: 172 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi:
I too have suspended crunching on other project so I can help in wrapping up HCMD2. If you consult the graph at http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q210/Sekerob/WCGQuickLook.png, you will learn that this project is in mop up operation. Batches 2500 - 2544 are involved in this operation. I have just downloaded some batches numbered 2518 so the mop up operation is almost 50% complete. Clive |
||
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 2986 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi cehunt, your comment "I have just downloaded some batches numbered 2518 so the mop up operation is almost 50% complete" isn't actually quite accurate - just simply due to the nature of this particular project.
----------------------------------------As described elsewhere on the forum, this project is comprised of Work Units that originally start as "Parent" WU's, and if they're not complete within the allotted timescale, what's left is broken off into "child" WU's and sent for another go. This is repeated generating smaller and smaller WU's until the entire target is computed. I'm led to believe that all the Parent WU's for this last batch have now gone out and that people are working through the remaining Child WU's. Again, from what I'm reading on the forums (I'm currently focusing on other projects - so I don't have any first hand knowledge), it sounds as though once all the Child WU's have been processed, there'll be a further wave of Grandchildren (and so on), until everything is finally wrapped up. So, hopefully, we're a lot further than ~50% complete with these last batches. ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
We are now 67 days into 2500-2544. Strictly speaking, if children of 2518 are going out and the order is still fairly sequential, 2519/2544 = 43% of the first offspring have gone out. The thread indicates somewhere when the first children went out, so child batches 45/19*xx days since circulation started, would give a ballpark of days left of full supply of this generation. Guess it would have been around July 15-18 that almost entirely children started to get validated [no more parents in any numbers]. Based on the last 7 day validations, a fair extrapolation can be made of how many said children [quorum 2] are still to go out, but round about 2.5 to 3 weeks more is the edge of envelope calc
83,940 81,928 83,801 86,209 88,686 84,880 87,520 BTW, the weighting in CPU years is not full [in results it is]. HCMD2 runs about 9 years less daily as the top 5 in the pack: http://bit.ly/WCGQLK [waving all and every responsibility for these out of thin air 2 cents ;]. |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Truthfully I wish I understood all of the technical jargon but I don't. The only way that i can help is with some physical effort in raising money for this terrible disease. Our family is going door to door and calling friends so that we can make at least a small donation, whether it's one dollar or one thousand dollars(whatever we raise) to Jerry's kids before the telethon.
________________________________ Pregnancy Pillow Reviews |
||
|
branjo
Master Cruncher Slovakia Joined: Jun 29, 2012 Post Count: 1892 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 alex33: I also wish I have paid more more attention on English language lessons in school(s).
----------------------------------------![]() Crunching@Home since January 13 2000. Shrubbing@Home since January 5 2006 ![]() |
||
|
Randzo
Senior Cruncher Slovakia Joined: Jan 10, 2008 Post Count: 339 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hello,
what is the current status of this project? Are there any WU left? Or just temporary issue on my side? Tue 11 Sep 2012 06:34:19 PM CEST World Community Grid Message from server: No tasks are available for Help Cure Muscular Dystrophy - Phase 2 SEK's chart http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q210/Sekerob/WCGDashboard.png shows 14 days left. Thank you, Randzo |
||
|
|
![]() |