| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Computing for Clean Water Forum
Thread: New work for target07 available for Computing for Clean Water |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 58
|
|
| Author |
|
|
cjslman
Master Cruncher Mexico Joined: Nov 23, 2004 Post Count: 2082 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I was just wondering where we currently are with the crunching of target 07 for C4CW...
----------------------------------------The techs indicated that target 07 had aprox 4M WUs. My first C4CW WU was c4cw_ target07_ 000056307 _ 0-- and the latest one I have received is c4cw_ target07_ 002620588 _ 0--... does this mean that we have plowed through over half the WUs for target 07? Thanks, CJSL Crunching for a better future... |
||
|
|
deltavee
Ace Cruncher Texas Hill Country Joined: Nov 17, 2004 Post Count: 4888 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I was just wondering where we currently are with the crunching of target 07 for C4CW... The techs indicated that target 07 had aprox 4M WUs. My first C4CW WU was c4cw_ target07_ 000056307 _ 0-- and the latest one I have received is c4cw_ target07_ 002620588 _ 0--... does this mean that we have plowed through over half the WUs for target 07?. It appears we have returned 167,536 WUs through yesterday. http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/stat/viewPr...&numRecordsPerPage=30 |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I was just wondering where we currently are with the crunching of target 07 for C4CW... The techs indicated that target 07 had aprox 4M WUs. My first C4CW WU was c4cw_ target07_ 000056307 _ 0-- and the latest one I have received is c4cw_ target07_ 002620588 _ 0--... does this mean that we have plowed through over half the WUs for target 07? Thanks, CJSL Crunching for a better future... The work unit numbers are actually c4cw_target07_002620588_0. This means that you got work unit in batch 262 out of 4,000. (1000 work units per batch). However, since we were loading in a bunch of workunits at once to get the project going again, they sometimes get loaded out of order. So, we are closer to 5% done than 50% and without actually looking up how many were technically returned or sent out, I would guess we're closer to 2-3% done. Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
gomeyer
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 11, 2008 Post Count: 161 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Thanks uplinger, I was wondering about that numbering scheme myself.
----------------------------------------  |
||
|
|
Thargor
Veteran Cruncher UK Joined: Feb 3, 2012 Post Count: 1291 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Have now got 44 threads working on this, as I'd like to add another Sapphire badge to the collection before this run dries up, if possible!
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
I was just wondering where we currently are with the crunching of target 07 for C4CW... The techs indicated that target 07 had aprox 4M WUs. My first C4CW WU was c4cw_ target07_ 000056307 _ 0-- and the latest one I have received is c4cw_ target07_ 002620588 _ 0--... does this mean that we have plowed through over half the WUs for target 07? Thanks, CJSL Crunching for a better future... The work unit numbers are actually c4cw_target07_002620588_0. This means that you got work unit in batch 262 out of 4,000. (1000 work units per batch). However, since we were loading in a bunch of workunits at once to get the project going again, they sometimes get loaded out of order. So, we are closer to 5% done than 50% and without actually looking up how many were technically returned or sent out, I would guess we're closer to 2-3% done. Thanks, -Uplinger An expansion on what that final 8 means [the digit varies with each task from 0 through 9] non-matching to the second last, such as c4cw_ target07_ 002246514_ 0-- carries my interest. Is this a subset of e.g. 224651 i.e. a simulation cut up in multiple tasks and if so, a constant number or variable... 1 in 5 parts (ending in a 4), another in 10 parts (ending in 9). This would multiple the number of WU's by a substantial factor. Of course it could also be a number to indicate a parm selector for any simulation as chosen by a pre-processing work generator. In short, are we talking 4000 batches of 1000 times the quorum 2 and error factor [e.g. 1.25], making it 5 million results, or are we looking at something bigger [first 6 targets needed 91 million results to complete]. edit: To me it's the difference to having to enter a result number to compute the target progress for the Dashboard publication, or a simple automation... cumulative 260,000 validated of 5 million est. equal 5.2% done. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jan 7, 2013 3:14:46 PM] |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I was just wondering where we currently are with the crunching of target 07 for C4CW... The techs indicated that target 07 had aprox 4M WUs. My first C4CW WU was c4cw_ target07_ 000056307 _ 0-- and the latest one I have received is c4cw_ target07_ 002620588 _ 0--... does this mean that we have plowed through over half the WUs for target 07? Thanks, CJSL Crunching for a better future... The work unit numbers are actually c4cw_target07_002620588_0. This means that you got work unit in batch 262 out of 4,000. (1000 work units per batch). However, since we were loading in a bunch of workunits at once to get the project going again, they sometimes get loaded out of order. So, we are closer to 5% done than 50% and without actually looking up how many were technically returned or sent out, I would guess we're closer to 2-3% done. Thanks, -Uplinger An expansion on what that final 8 means [the digit varies with each task from 0 through 9] non-matching to the second last, such as c4cw_ target07_ 002246514_ 0-- carries my interest. Is this a subset of e.g. 224651 i.e. a simulation cut up in multiple tasks and if so, a constant number or variable... 1 in 5 parts (ending in a 4), another in 10 parts (ending in 9). This would multiple the number of WU's by a substantial factor. Of course it could also be a number to indicate a parm selector for any simulation as chosen by a pre-processing work generator. In short, are we talking 4000 batches of 1000 times the quorum 2 and error factor [e.g. 1.25], making it 5 million results, or are we looking at something bigger [first 6 targets needed 91 million results to complete]. edit: To me it's the difference to having to enter a result number to compute the target progress for the Dashboard publication, or a simple automation... cumulative 260,000 validated of 5 million est. equal 5.2% done. Sekerob, the final digit in that work unit name is just random. The work unit name/number is used in a minimal capactiy to set a random value generator in one part of the code. It does not represent a work unit getting split up into various parts unfortunately. Right now from the researchers we were told 4 million work units were to be run. Beyond that I do not know. I would say going with the 5.2% is pretty accurate assumption. Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
cjslman
Master Cruncher Mexico Joined: Nov 23, 2004 Post Count: 2082 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks everybody for your explanations... I think I now understand how the numbering convention works.
----------------------------------------CJSL Crunching for a better world... |
||
|
|
CandymanWCG
Senior Cruncher Romania Joined: Dec 20, 2010 Post Count: 421 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Work units for the new C4CW target (target07) have successfully completed beta testing and are now available. This target is currently expected to contain 4,000,000 work units. Please let us know if you encounter any issues. Seippel Hi Seippel, Thanks for the update. Maybe somebody else here noticed and already raised a flag on this, but shouldn't the project be pulled out of the "intermittent" category in this case? Cheers! Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world! - Albert Einstein   |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Work units for the new C4CW target (target07) have successfully completed beta testing and are now available. This target is currently expected to contain 4,000,000 work units. Please let us know if you encounter any issues. Seippel Hi Seippel, Thanks for the update. Maybe somebody else here noticed and already raised a flag on this, but shouldn't the project be pulled out of the "intermittent" category in this case? Cheers! At this moment since it looks like it'll only be running a short period of time, ie less than a few months we are going to keep it at intermittent. We will let members know if we change the designation. Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
|