The DDD2 project spent the last months, behind the scenes, double checking their approach to further refine their drug candidate list. Unfortunately their approach did not yield good enough results to merit continued computation on the grid. This is part of the normal scientific process. Scientists come up with hypotheses and test them. Often the hypothesis is proved wrong and this is useful knowledge for the next scientist. Research is really like trial and error, but with some intelligence added to improve the likelihood of success. But that intelligence still does not guarantee success. If successes were predictable, then research would not be required. At least this project did find many potential drug candidates to test and those tests are proceeding in the laboratory. And we thank our members for their contributions this project and all of the others, furthering their research.

Well I'm just glad that we have completed yet another project and done something useful.

Crunch on peeps...................