| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: New Beta Test - Nov 27, 2014 [ Issues thread ] |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 253
|
|
| Author |
|
|
Dark Angel
Veteran Cruncher Australia Joined: Nov 11, 2005 Post Count: 721 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Four units doing funny things here as well.
----------------------------------------BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_0375_0 BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_0376_0 BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_0374_0 BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_0384_0 Linux 64bit For reference this machine does MCM work in 2.5 to 3 hours and is running of a USB stick. The first one is showing 40% at seven hours, last three are 80% and almost at 14 hours runtime. They SEEM to be progressing, having jumped up 10% from when I looked at them an hour ago.  Currently being moderated under false pretences |
||
|
|
foxfire
Advanced Cruncher United States Joined: Sep 1, 2007 Post Count: 121 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Seeing the same behavior, makes it to 90% then drops back:
----------------------------------------Name-------------------------------------------------Wall (CPU) --------CPU% Progress Left BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_0152_0 05:45:32 (05:43:10) 99.31 20.000 00:55:17 Linux BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_0158_0 05:47:18 (05:46:56) 99.90 20.000 00:55:34 Win7 BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_0890_0 05:47:18 (05:47:11) 99.97 20.000 00:55:34 Win7 BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_0960_0 05:44:44 (05:42:05) 99.23 20.000 00:55:09 Linux BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_1001_1 05:45:32 (05:43:09) 99.31 30.000 01:12:33 Linux BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OM_rig_1273_1 05:44:44 (05:42:08) 99.25 20.000 00:55:09 Linux  |
||
|
|
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 13, 2009 Post Count: 1066 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
foxfire,
I was wondering whether this was one of those VINA projects that works a lot better on Linux than Win7. Do you think that your results show that they are about equal? Since they don't complete but drop back, it is hard to tell, but if they are both really at 90% complete, it seems that they are equal. If so, they have made big improvements since the last time. |
||
|
|
Seoulpowergrid
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Apr 12, 2013 Post Count: 818 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
My Mac laptop got 1 and is having some issues (BETA_OET1_0000307_xEBGP-OMrig_1383_0 The elapsed time is now well into 10 hours and the progress is now exactly 70.000%. Remaining has reappeared as well and is at 2 hours 15 minutes and the seconds are going in the upwards direction (because the progress % isn't going up?).It started with "remaining time" around 34 or 39 minutes. After an hour or so the remaining time gave up and changed to --- and elapsed and progress continued up. After 2 hours 43 minutes it hit 100% but then changed to 10.000% and the number won't go up despite elapsed continuing. Remaining reshuffled to 14 minutes and slowly is climbing up as is elapsed but progress ain't budging. I'll let it go overnight and report if anything has changed by the morning. I know this must be very frustrating for the techs involved but it is fascinating to see behind the curtain a bit witnessing the kind of issues that can come up.  |
||
|
|
Dark Angel
Veteran Cruncher Australia Joined: Nov 11, 2005 Post Count: 721 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
I've returned a couple of them now, both around the 16 hour mark without crashing. A previous on I did has the completion time listed as 0.01 hours and 1.65h clock time. Very odd time keeping on these units.
----------------------------------------Currently being moderated under false pretences |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Batch 307 has a search box size that is 4 times the size of normal. As well as running a larger number of exhaustiveness on flexible work units. All of these variables cause them to be massive. We identified these as workunit issues and are working with the researchers on them. At the moment we do not plan to run any of these at launch. Please continue to let them run as they will provide us with data about size of ligands run in these situations.
Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
Composer
Cruncher Joined: May 28, 2014 Post Count: 29 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
WU: BETA_ OET1_ 0000041_ xEBGP_ 0274_ 1--
on the results status page, this one is listed as pending validation, but when I look at the details provided, the CPU time reads 0, (shown in image below) despite displaying a non-zero CPU time on the stderr file. (last few lines of said file are below) [12:28:35] Vina exited normal 0. [12:28:35] Finished task #66 cpu time used 268.375000 12:28:35 (4708): called boinc_finish </stderr_txt> ]]>  Not sure if it might correct itself when the second quorum comes in or not. |
||
|
|
gomeyer
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 11, 2008 Post Count: 161 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
. . . Please continue to let them run as they will provide us with data about size of ligands run in these situations. Thanks, -Uplinger You got it. 10 on the way (sometime) although at least one looks to take over 24 hours. You might set these up to run as a sub-project and use a system similar to the one for Clean Energy.  [Edit 1 times, last edit by gomeyer at Dec 3, 2014 3:57:24 AM] |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Composer, yes, we do see that some of the work units with application version older than 707 it is fixed in version 707.
thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
foxfire
Advanced Cruncher United States Joined: Sep 1, 2007 Post Count: 121 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
foxfire, I was wondering whether this was one of those VINA projects that works a lot better on Linux than Win7. Do you think that your results show that they are about equal? Since they don't complete but drop back, it is hard to tell, but if they are both really at 90% complete, it seems that they are equal. If so, they have made big improvements since the last time. Jim, as yet they haven't completed so no way to tell if results better on one then the other. There does not seem t/b any difference as to run times, as both Win and Linus are verrrry slow. |
||
|
|
|