Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 169
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Big jump in Linux Pending Validations in last 24 hours. Based on the evolving projection sheet been upping the cycles again [and the heatwave abating a bit]. 'Still' overbuffered by 31 days, 7 days less than previously in crunching faster. Will let the oldest go closer to target [So close and still so far away it feels :]
|
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Linux PV made another big jump after the pre-noon upload of results... now 197 waiting on a wingman. The age suggests these are unlikely to get them to report in time... No Reply converts in 24-48 hours is the guesstimate.
Also giving a batch of 51 back in excess to fine line need to target [worth 4 days computing at 1.8Ghz]. They will report at 23:45 UTC when the network schedule is set to report the next 12 hours of crunching, so get your nets out,, if you will. ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
So gave 51 one back to the pool, but then missed to recognize that there were a dozen more getting borderline overdue. Then when the scheduler connected at 23:45 UTC, they were few hours overdue, and the repairs already returned. Oh well, you can't win them all (or will I get lucky and the Too Late script still send periodic credit?) No disaster, still on track to overshoot target. There'd be a few more to give back...
FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 1731_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 2.18 / 2.26 28.0 / 0.0 FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 2392_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 1.31 / 1.38 17.1 / 0.0 FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 2391_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 1.47 / 1.57 19.5 / 0.0 FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 2388_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 1.93 / 2.03 25.2 / 0.0 FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 2354_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 1.31 / 1.34 16.6 / 0.0 FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 2188_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 1.40 / 1.48 18.3 / 0.0 FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 2131_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 1.38 / 1.41 17.5 / 0.0 FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 2011_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 2.35 / 2.48 30.8 / 0.0 FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 1895_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 1.32 / 1.40 17.4 / 0.0 FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 1819_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 2.22 / 2.26 28.1 / 0.0 FAHV_ x2O4S-B-AS_ 0896666_ 2411_ 0-- 2372334 Too Late 6/9/15 20:55:41 6/19/15 23:48:48 1.43 / 1.51 18.8 / 0.0 Yesterday still 41.7K results validated, today's projection around 35K. Clearly not alone in using all possible tools in the crunching trade ;) |
||
|
cehunt
Senior Cruncher CANADA Joined: Oct 10, 2011 Post Count: 172 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Rob:
I have my nets out but I have yet to get any resends yet. Hoping to accelerate the completion of FAH. There is still plenty of work to be completed in the Clean Energy Project. I am half a year away from earning a 20 year badge in this project. Clive |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Put
----------------------------------------The PV pile of 201 dropped to just 43 in previous 24 hours, so had a good day on validated results... 526. The Linux keeps eating them like munchies ... in this hunt had the world result ranking going from 1650 to 1402 at this time. After this, the machine will get Ebola served... if 10 minutes on Windows it will be 5 minutes on Ubuntu ![]() June 20 had the project total 36K+ validated. Today... maybe 25-30K still. it's day 10 after the end of new work, so the drop to just thousands is likely steep. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jun 21, 2015 9:17:40 AM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
PV pile dropped from 55 at midnight to just 9... why the rush guys ;?
----------------------------------------On a happy note for others, gave another 56 tasks back off the Linux buffer. The mark slipped to 4:39AM... factored in the pool crunching efficiency :D. Liftoff in T minus 56983 seconds ![]() Edit: Sent 212 total back today. T minus 14697 second at 1:35 UTC [Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Jun 21, 2015 9:40:22 PM] |
||
|
Domdom95
Cruncher Joined: Nov 25, 2006 Post Count: 21 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
To those suggesting buying very cheap phones to Crunch with them, are you sure it is worth it?
I own a phone CPU is MTK 6589, 1,2Ghz, 4 cores. Bought end of 2013. To crunch 1 OET, I need more than 24 hours. 4 cores so I can send back 4 results every 26, 27, 30 hours, depending on how I use my phone. Less than 4 results per day is very low, but hundreds of thousands of people sending back 4 results per day, well you can say it is still ok. But your very low budget phones, how many times do they calculate 1 task? Because your phone is using electricity and it is not free, you have to pay for it and someone has to create it. Very soon I will buy a new phone, 8 cores, 64bits, MTK 6752 I think, ~200€. Chinese phones, bought from a importer. So what is best? A very low budget which calculate 1 task in x hours/days or a brand new chinese phone, which are not low quality, they run very fast, have complete options, gps/glonass/beidu, nfc, 4G, 1080p, gorilla glass, 64bit cores, very good photo/video, very good quality of the screen with wide angles, dual sim, you can add a sim card, 2 or 3GB Ram. Not a known brand like Samsung or others ones, just chinese brand and of course much lower price. So a low budget phone or a 2015 chinese phone 8 cores 64bits, very powerful? We would need some calculating charts. - phone brand X and CPU A calculates 1 task in x hours - phone brand Y and CPU B calculates 1 task in x minutes - phone brand Z and CPU C calculates 1 task in x seconds (well maybe not seconds ;) |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Great, but plz move that phone discussion to the Hardware CF.
----------------------------------------![]() On the final, released 60 more back at ~2:17 UTC, according the Excel query listed with exit code 203. Per same query sheet, overshot target by 1.28 days, 45 valid, 14 still in PVal. Moved on to MCM/UGM/OET/CEP2 (trickle settings for latter). 3.5-4 months till MCM end. Think no hunt is needed as in the mix, this project will get most time anyhow to reach objective contribution. Edit: Did not untick FA@H, as when the BEDAM version comes under same label, so received... a No Reply repair... it's gone UA just now ;p FAHV_ x4MC9-A-AS_ 0895440_ 1985_ 3-- - In Progress 6/22/15 07:11:53 6/25/15 19:11:53 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 FAHV_ x4MC9-A-AS_ 0895440_ 1985_ 2-- 732 User Aborted 6/22/15 06:44:25 6/22/15 07:11:51 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 FAHV_ x4MC9-A-AS_ 0895440_ 1985_ 1-- 732 Pending Validation 6/12/15 06:44:45 6/14/15 11:48:23 1.58 25.6 / 0.0 FAHV_ x4MC9-A-AS_ 0895440_ 1985_ 0-- - No Reply 6/12/15 06:44:24 6/22/15 06:44:24 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 It took exactly 2 seconds to go out again ![]() [Edit 2 times, last edit by Former Member at Jun 22, 2015 7:14:51 AM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
.
. . . . . . . <--- All the hard labor and scheming and knobbing [the hardware and software configs] is expressed at left ![]() |
||
|
enels
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2008 Post Count: 286 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Congratulations SekeRob!
|
||
|
|
![]() |