Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 171
Posts: 171   Pages: 18   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 25035 times and has 170 replies Next Thread
Rickjb
Veteran Cruncher
Australia
Joined: Sep 17, 2006
Post Count: 666
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - July 21, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

Got 4 resends, on 64-bit Linux VM under XP-x64 host, 3770K CPU.
BETA_ beta26_ 00000021_ 0357_ 1
BETA_ beta26_ 00000021_ 0348_ 1
BETA_ beta26_ 00000021_ 0368_ 1
BETA_ beta26_ 00000021_ 0364_ 1
All 4 wingmen errored with "Got signal 11" at 0.61 - 0.63h
Mine are running OK after 35m - 2h05m, and have all resumed OK from checkpoints after a system reboot.

CHECKPOINTING:
As pointed out above by Sekerob-superstar, these betas checkpoint relatively infrequently so crunchers will waste CPU time if they shut down their BOINC clients unless they first suspend all running betas immediately after each one checkpoints.
BOINC Manager does not have a facility to do this.
BoincTasks DOES!!
And it shows no of checkpoints so far (in[]) and time since last. Handy.
There are small delays between checkpointing and suspending, suggesting that checkpointing is polled, rather than via signals sent from the BOINC client.
The disadvantage of BoincTasks is that it's harder to set up than is Boinc Manager.

Should members be informed/reminded of the above advantage of BoincTasks when this new project is launched?
[Jul 23, 2017 3:48:04 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - July 21, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

Looks like we are seeing errors on the 64bit Windows version, that is the second error you are seeing. We are looking into it.
I have the resend BETA_ beta26_ 00000021_ 0609_ 2--. Both _0 and _1 errored with Incorrect function (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) and ERROR: Value of inactive option accessed: -in:file:native; however _2 has started up without an error (so far). In the Result Log _0 and _1 have
command: projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcgrid_beta26_rosetta_7.08_windows_x86_64
whereas (in stderr.txt) _2 has
command: projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcgrid_beta26_rosetta_7.08_windows_intelx86
It looks as though my (64 bit) machine is running the 32 bit app version whereas the errored wingmen were running the 64 bit app version.
The first checkpoint was at 20 mins.

Edit: Completed successfully (in PVal, Quorum 1) in 8.44hr, 27 structures (from the Result Log), so 18.75min each on average (the only time when the checkpointing takes place? - at the end of each structure).
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Jul 23, 2017 5:32:43 PM]
[Jul 23, 2017 8:22:51 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1323
Status: Recently Active
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - July 21, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

Same as Tony reported.
I got a resend from a machine that tried running projects/www.worldcommunitygrid.org/wcgrid_beta26_rosetta_7.08_windows_x86_64

Received the resend BETA_ beta26_ 00000021_ 0049_ 1-- on a Win7 64bit, but the task is running with the windows_intelx86.

The started well and is now running 47 minutes and 5% done.
Strange for me is that this beta task initially was started with quorum 1.
[Jul 23, 2017 7:33:59 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - July 21, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

If it is what little information taken from the slot info and result log, random generator, rosetta, , abrelax , i.e protein folding, it is likely a similar scheme as HPF2 of results being grouped. Vaguely remember this was like 30,000 for the then project.

Just wild guessing.
[Jul 23, 2017 9:34:18 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Speedy51
Veteran Cruncher
New Zealand
Joined: Nov 4, 2005
Post Count: 1297
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - July 21, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

I have the following.BETA_ beta26_ 00000021_ 0431_ 3-- Pending Validation 7/22/17 06:45:51 7/23/17 03:31:45 8.95 / 8.98 281.8 / 0.0 Is everybody seeing this that has returned results?
----------------------------------------

[Jul 23, 2017 11:07:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Apr 3, 2009
Post Count: 2172
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - July 21, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

You mean Pending Validation? Over here, too:
Result Name                   OS       OS Version                                 AVN Status Sent Time         Due / Return Time CPUh  Claimed/Gr.
BETA_beta26_00000021_0502_1-- Linux 4.11.10-300.fc26.x86_64 708 P.Val. 7/23/17 01:22:03 7/23/17 10:32:53 6.98 247.1/0.0
BETA_beta26_00000021_0502_0-- MSWin 10 Professional x64 Edition, (10.00.15063.00) 708 Error 7/21/17 22:56:51 7/23/17 01:21:57 0.00 0.1/0.0

[Jul 23, 2017 11:49:21 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - July 21, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

I finally got one beta Wu and it had a http error and the download failed. I just aborted it. crying

BETA_ beta26_ 00000021_ 0242_ 1--
[Jul 24, 2017 1:38:59 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
keithhenry
Ace Cruncher
Senile old farts of the world ....uh.....uh..... nevermind
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 18665
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - July 21, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

It's normal for Betas to sit in Pending Validation, even with quorum of 1. The validator normally doesn't run on betas until the admin starts it up, probably once they have enough returned WUs. Betas also normally stay in Results Status until they run another task after the beta ends to clean that up.
----------------------------------------
Join/Website/IMODB



[Jul 24, 2017 1:51:30 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - July 21, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

keith,

This Wu never completely downloaded to my computer. The download failed. It never even tried to run. I went to one of my Intel micro sticks running Linux. The download "gave up" due to a "permanent HTTP error.

Result Log

Result Name: BETA_ beta26_ 00000021_ 0242_ 1--
<core_client_version>7.2.42</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
app_version download error: couldn't get input files:
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>wcgrid_beta26_rosetta_7.08_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu</file_name>
<error_code>-224 (permanent HTTP error)</error_code>
<error_message>permanent HTTP error</error_message>
</file_xfer_error>

</message>
]]>
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by Raif_son at Jul 24, 2017 2:50:22 AM]
[Jul 24, 2017 2:14:59 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Seoulpowergrid
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: Apr 12, 2013
Post Count: 818
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test - July 21, 2017 [ Issues Thread ]

Looks like we are seeing errors on the 64bit Windows version, ...
That explains it. The first person had Win 7 "Enterprise x64 Edition, Service Pack 1" and ended in a quick error but my Linux "4.8.0-34-generic" ran them fine in 9 hours.

BETA_beta26_00000021_0558
BETA_beta26_00000021_0576

Edit: They are both Pending Validation and a new copy has yet to be sent out to other wingmen. Did it get put on hold while techs are looking into the 64bit Windows issue?
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Seoulpowergrid at Jul 24, 2017 2:23:49 AM]
[Jul 24, 2017 2:21:53 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 171   Pages: 18   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread