Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 315
|
![]() |
Author |
|
TPCBF
Master Cruncher USA Joined: Jan 2, 2011 Post Count: 1951 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Well, I was able to check one of the remote hosts that got those WUs and the runtime estimates are certainly off. Like 17% done in 3h and it shows remaining 28min...
----------------------------------------Ralf ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
31% at 22 hours heading for 70, like CPDNhas been doing since year, a prime candidate for a trickle/credit policy. Oh, and only 2 checkpoints in the first 19 hours at 3.4Ghz. Recommend a sturdy UPS.
|
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Deadline seems to be varying. Three units have a 4-day deadline, the other two a 7-day deadline as was reported before. The initial 100 workunits (200 results) had an initial deadline of 4 days. The remaining workunits have a deadline of 7 days. If a resend happens due to an error, then the resent result will have a shorter deadline. If my memory serves me correctly, this is set to 40% of the original deadline. So this would be about 3 days. Note: resends should end in a _2, _3, etc.... Thanks, -Uplinger Or, like HST1, just keep it fixed, at 10 days with a projected 70 hours now after 22 hours and 30%. |
||
|
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher Joined: May 21, 2008 Post Count: 1320 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
.... If a resend happens due to an error, then the resent result will have a shorter deadline. If my memory serves me correctly, this is set to 40% of the original deadline. So this would be about 3 days. Note: resends should end in a _2, _3, etc.... Thanks, -Uplinger I got a resend: BETA_ARP1_0000088_000_2 (Original _1: aborting on client exit after almost 8 hours run time) Deadline: 02 Jun 23:25:28 Received: 29 May 23:25:27 The deadline is 4 days for this task. The same as result _0. The main thing we are looking at with this test is the valid rate after restarts. I restarted a task 10 minutes after the 2nd checkpoint (LAIM off) was made. The task restarted fine. It looks like a checkpoint is set after a progress of 12.5%, 25%, 37,5% etc. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Crystal Pellet at May 30, 2019 7:53:16 AM] |
||
|
Dark Angel
Veteran Cruncher Australia Joined: Nov 11, 2005 Post Count: 721 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Reported first of three.
----------------------------------------Seems it thinks it only took 14.07 minutes to run. It was more like 18 hours. and 32 credits for 18 hours work is garbage. Restarted clients with remaining two. One picked up fine, the other seems to have lost about 7 hours of run time. Neither errored out as yet. ![]() Currently being moderated under false pretences [Edit 1 times, last edit by Dark Angel at May 30, 2019 8:16:01 AM] |
||
|
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 13, 2009 Post Count: 1066 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thus, I am thinking they are either using larger geographic areas, or they are not trying to simulate the entire surface of the Earth and are using many fewer areas of the earth, maybe only land areas or populated areas or heavily trafficed ares of the oceans. This is, of course, only speculation by a highly uninformed cruncher. Feel free to correct or speculate as you wish. The Africa study would be a lot smaller, for example. But bring it on. I will add machines as necessary. |
||
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2157 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
When this workunit reached 100% it took a whole minute to complete and end its final processing.
----------------------------------------Result Name Status Sent Time Due / Return Time CPUh/Spent Claimed/Granted But only 31.7 UPDATE: ... and the other one just arrived after 16 hours and 12 minutes of CPU time: Result Name Status Sent Time Due / Return Time CPUh/Spent Claimed/Granted Same story, only 31.7 EDIT: 31.7 credits = 221 points [Edit 2 times, last edit by adriverhoef at May 31, 2019 1:55:20 PM] |
||
|
Dark Angel
Veteran Cruncher Australia Joined: Nov 11, 2005 Post Count: 721 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ok, all three done and uploaded.
----------------------------------------Two are reporting a fraction over 14 hours. That's bollocks, they both went over 18 hours. Result Name Device Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit BETA_ ARP1_ 0001780_ 000_ 1-- Mint-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 18:08:09 5/30/19 09:30:46 14.10 / 14.14 31.7 / 0.0 BETA_ ARP1_ 0000302_ 000_ 0-- Mint-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 17:45:54 5/30/19 07:52:54 14.04 / 14.07 31.7 / 0.0 BETA_ ARP1_ 0000031_ 000_ 0-- Tall-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 13:34:40 5/30/19 10:07:07 19.45 / 19.45 31.7 / 0.0 ![]() Currently being moderated under false pretences |
||
|
Mumak
Senior Cruncher Joined: Dec 7, 2012 Post Count: 477 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I forced one of them to restart: BETA_ ARP1_ 0001872_ 000_ 1--
----------------------------------------Shall finish in 1.5 h, let's see the result then. ![]() |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Ok, all three done and uploaded. Two are reporting a fraction over 14 hours. That's bollocks, they both went over 18 hours. Result Name Device Name Status Sent Time Time Due / Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit BETA_ ARP1_ 0001780_ 000_ 1-- Mint-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 18:08:09 5/30/19 09:30:46 14.10 / 14.14 31.7 / 0.0 BETA_ ARP1_ 0000302_ 000_ 0-- Mint-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 17:45:54 5/30/19 07:52:54 14.04 / 14.07 31.7 / 0.0 BETA_ ARP1_ 0000031_ 000_ 0-- Tall-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 13:34:40 5/30/19 10:07:07 19.45 / 19.45 31.7 / 0.0 I believe the dog loves them. ;o) |
||
|
|
![]() |