Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 315
Posts: 315   Pages: 32   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 65821 times and has 314 replies Next Thread
TPCBF
Master Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 2, 2011
Post Count: 1951
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

Well, I was able to check one of the remote hosts that got those WUs and the runtime estimates are certainly off. Like 17% done in 3h and it shows remaining 28min...

Ralf
----------------------------------------

[May 30, 2019 6:26:37 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

31% at 22 hours heading for 70, like CPDNhas been doing since year, a prime candidate for a trickle/credit policy. Oh, and only 2 checkpoints in the first 19 hours at 3.4Ghz. Recommend a sturdy UPS.
[May 30, 2019 7:25:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

Deadline seems to be varying. Three units have a 4-day deadline, the other two a 7-day deadline as was reported before.


The initial 100 workunits (200 results) had an initial deadline of 4 days. The remaining workunits have a deadline of 7 days. If a resend happens due to an error, then the resent result will have a shorter deadline. If my memory serves me correctly, this is set to 40% of the original deadline. So this would be about 3 days.

Note: resends should end in a _2, _3, etc....

Thanks,
-Uplinger

Or, like HST1, just keep it fixed, at 10 days with a projected 70 hours now after 22 hours and 30%.
[May 30, 2019 7:27:51 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Crystal Pellet
Veteran Cruncher
Joined: May 21, 2008
Post Count: 1320
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

.... If a resend happens due to an error, then the resent result will have a shorter deadline. If my memory serves me correctly, this is set to 40% of the original deadline. So this would be about 3 days.

Note: resends should end in a _2, _3, etc....

Thanks,
-Uplinger

I got a resend: BETA_ARP1_0000088_000_2 (Original _1: aborting on client exit after almost 8 hours run time)

Deadline: 02 Jun 23:25:28
Received: 29 May 23:25:27

The deadline is 4 days for this task. The same as result _0.

The main thing we are looking at with this test is the valid rate after restarts.

I restarted a task 10 minutes after the 2nd checkpoint (LAIM off) was made.
The task restarted fine.
It looks like a checkpoint is set after a progress of 12.5%, 25%, 37,5% etc.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Crystal Pellet at May 30, 2019 7:53:16 AM]
[May 30, 2019 7:50:56 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Dark Angel
Veteran Cruncher
Australia
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Post Count: 721
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

Reported first of three.
Seems it thinks it only took 14.07 minutes to run.
It was more like 18 hours.
and 32 credits for 18 hours work is garbage.

Restarted clients with remaining two.
One picked up fine, the other seems to have lost about 7 hours of run time. Neither errored out as yet.
----------------------------------------

Currently being moderated under false pretences
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Dark Angel at May 30, 2019 8:16:01 AM]
[May 30, 2019 8:07:33 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Jim1348
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 13, 2009
Post Count: 1066
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

Thus, I am thinking they are either using larger geographic areas, or they are not trying to simulate the entire surface of the Earth and are using many fewer areas of the earth, maybe only land areas or populated areas or heavily trafficed ares of the oceans.
This is, of course, only speculation by a highly uninformed cruncher. Feel free to correct or speculate as you wish.

The Africa study would be a lot smaller, for example.
But bring it on. I will add machines as necessary.
[May 30, 2019 9:20:24 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher
The Netherlands
Joined: Apr 3, 2009
Post Count: 2157
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

When this workunit reached 100% it took a whole minute to complete and end its final processing.
Result Name               Status           Sent Time     Due / Return Time  CPUh/Spent Claimed/Granted
BETA_ARP1_0001148_000_0-- Pending Val. 5/29/19 17:59:06 5/30/19 09:36:56 15.21/15.50 31.7/0.0


But only 31.7 pointscredits for 15½ hours of processing time is utter ... ridiculous.

UPDATE:
... and the other one just arrived after 16 hours and 12 minutes of CPU time:
Result Name               Status           Sent Time     Due / Return Time  CPUh/Spent Claimed/Granted
BETA_ARP1_0000534_000_0-- Pending Val. 5/29/19 17:49:00 5/30/19 10:21:35 16.12/16.43 31.7/0.0

Same story, only 31.7 pointscredits.

EDIT: 31.7 credits = 221 points
----------------------------------------
[Edit 2 times, last edit by adriverhoef at May 31, 2019 1:55:20 PM]
[May 30, 2019 9:48:45 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Dark Angel
Veteran Cruncher
Australia
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Post Count: 721
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

Ok, all three done and uploaded.
Two are reporting a fraction over 14 hours. That's bollocks, they both went over 18 hours.

Result Name Device Name Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
BETA_ ARP1_ 0001780_ 000_ 1-- Mint-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 18:08:09 5/30/19 09:30:46 14.10 / 14.14 31.7 / 0.0
BETA_ ARP1_ 0000302_ 000_ 0-- Mint-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 17:45:54 5/30/19 07:52:54 14.04 / 14.07 31.7 / 0.0
BETA_ ARP1_ 0000031_ 000_ 0-- Tall-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 13:34:40 5/30/19 10:07:07 19.45 / 19.45 31.7 / 0.0
----------------------------------------

Currently being moderated under false pretences
[May 30, 2019 10:11:13 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Mumak
Senior Cruncher
Joined: Dec 7, 2012
Post Count: 477
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

I forced one of them to restart: BETA_ ARP1_ 0001872_ 000_ 1--
Shall finish in 1.5 h, let's see the result then.
----------------------------------------

[May 30, 2019 11:01:39 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: New Beta Test – May 29, 2019 [Issues Thread]

Ok, all three done and uploaded.
Two are reporting a fraction over 14 hours. That's bollocks, they both went over 18 hours.

Result Name Device Name Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
BETA_ ARP1_ 0001780_ 000_ 1-- Mint-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 18:08:09 5/30/19 09:30:46 14.10 / 14.14 31.7 / 0.0
BETA_ ARP1_ 0000302_ 000_ 0-- Mint-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 17:45:54 5/30/19 07:52:54 14.04 / 14.07 31.7 / 0.0
BETA_ ARP1_ 0000031_ 000_ 0-- Tall-Boxen Pending Validation 5/29/19 13:34:40 5/30/19 10:07:07 19.45 / 19.45 31.7 / 0.0

I believe the dog loves them. ;o)
[May 30, 2019 11:27:24 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 315   Pages: 32   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread