| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Beta Testing
Forum: Beta Test Support Forum
Thread: OpenPandemics - COVID 19 Beta Test April 20, 2020 [ Issues Thread ] |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 303
|
|
| Author |
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
So the WUs with the 7.17 app are batches 337 and 338, right? Got 180 of those, but only 1 has started so far (getting quite a bit of FAH2 lately, so the client gives that priority). Is there really a difference between resuming with laim disabled and rebooting? I am getting lots of ARP work now, so rebooting would mean a lot of CPU time lost there... If it really is an important difference I can look for systems with relatively few ARP units. There should not be a difference between resuming with laim disabled or rebooting. The only thing you should check is that BOINC picked up the configuration change and that requires looking at the TaskManager or ps to make sure the wcgrid* processes don't exist anymore. For some, it may just be easier to reboot. I don't reboot my machines personally very often, thus my *gasp* in earlier comment. Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
From the last Beta batch (started on May 5th), 2 invalid WUs of about 140 WUs at this time: BETA_OPN1_0000336_02476 BETA_OPN1_0000337_00276 The results provided by the other wingmen are invalid too (no computation error just becoming invalid at validation time). Cheers, Yves Thanks for giving me those work unit names. I'll need to see why the result from 337 was invalid as it should have the build fix for the batches. Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
hiimebm
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: Oct 19, 2014 Post Count: 305 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
1 back on 18363 valid.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
hchc
Veteran Cruncher USA Joined: Aug 15, 2006 Post Count: 735 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Invalids across 4 wingmen on this 7.15 work unit:
----------------------------------------BETA_OPN1_0000336_06287
|
||
|
|
andgra
Senior Cruncher Sweden Joined: Mar 15, 2014 Post Count: 179 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Me, and my wings, have these 6 invalids so far:
----------------------------------------BETA_ OPN1_ 0000333_ 2027_ 3 BETA_ OPN1_ 0000334_ 09848_ 4 BETA_ OPN1_ 0000334_ 08202_ 3 BETA_ OPN1_ 0000334_ 03549_ 2 BETA_ OPN1_ 0000336_ 10044_ 0 BETA_ OPN1_ 0000333_ 1922_ 0 But 200 valids and 15 still in pval 
/andgra
 |
||
|
|
Warped@RSA
Senior Cruncher South Africa Joined: Jan 15, 2006 Post Count: 418 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Another 7.15 invalid work unit, attempted by 5 of us, all invalid:
----------------------------------------BETA_OPN1_0000334_09682
Dave
 |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Invalids across 4 wingmen on this 7.15 work unit: BETA_OPN1_0000336_06287 This was an issue with the build script. You can see the problem in the logs where the first dpf (Job #0) does not finish any dockings before starting Job #1... ...... INFO:[01:17:56] End AutoGrid... INFO:[01:17:57] Start AutoDock for ZINC000638864937_2-ACR1.11_RX1_6lu7_protein_monomer_ACYS38_wcgsplit3.dpf(Job #0)... INFO: In AutoDock main_autodock() Beginning AutoDock... INFO: Setting num_generations: 27000 About to enter main loop...(dockings already completed: 0) INFO:[01:18:01] End AutoDock... INFO:[01:18:01] Start AutoDock for ZINC000841038492_1-ACR1.15_RX1_6lu7_protein_monomer_ACYS38.dpf(Job #1)... INFO: In AutoDock main_autodock() Beginning AutoDock... INFO: Setting num_generations: 27000 About to enter main loop...(dockings already completed: 0) INFO:[01:23:33] Finished Docking number 0 INFO:[01:28:59] Finished Docking number 1 INFO:[01:34:25] Finished Docking number 2 ....... Thanks, -Uplinger |
||
|
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
From the last Beta batch (started on May 5th), 2 invalid WUs of about 140 WUs at this time: BETA_OPN1_0000336_02476 BETA_OPN1_0000337_00276 The results provided by the other wingmen are invalid too (no computation error just becoming invalid at validation time). Cheers, Yves Thanks for giving me those work unit names. I'll need to see why the result from 337 was invalid as it should have the build fix for the batches. Thanks, -Uplinger 337_00276 is invalid due to an overflow that was caused by our build script. We had not caught that issue yet and it's an easy fix. Thanks! Note: At the moment, I'm mainly concerned about results for batch 337 and 338 having invalids. There were many in 333-336 that were caused by a build script issue that has been corrected. -Uplinger |
||
|
|
spout23
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Apr 24, 2012 Post Count: 89 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Did a soft restart on Computer: WS-Delta32,
----------------------------------------the Beta 7.17 units restart after their last back-up. Hope this helps - Spout23   [Edit 1 times, last edit by spout23 at May 8, 2020 3:12:16 PM] |
||
|
|
Aurum
Master Cruncher The Great Basin Joined: Dec 24, 2017 Post Count: 2370 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I had no invalids from 337-338. All my invalids so far were from 333-336.
----------------------------------------  ...KRI please cancel all shadow-banning |
||
|
|
|