Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 1130
|
![]() |
Author |
|
I need a bath
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 12, 2007 Post Count: 347 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
well I'm gonna suspend some of mine until the techs weigh in. I don't want to waste any more time on the acidic wus.
----------------------------------------Has anyone had a successful completion of one of these recent ts05 "A" types? ![]() |
||
|
uplinger
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: May 23, 2005 Post Count: 3952 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There were some successful type A from the first two batches I sent last Friday. The work units that people have now, have not been running long enough to start showing the valids that come back. Generally we see the errors before the success results. This is due to most errors stopping the work unit within minutes of starting. Compared to a success result taking hours to run to completion.
-Uplinger |
||
|
X-Files 27
Senior Cruncher Canada Joined: May 21, 2007 Post Count: 391 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
you'll have my results in the next 10-20hrs
----------------------------------------![]() ![]() |
||
|
I need a bath
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 12, 2007 Post Count: 347 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There were some successful type A from the first two batches I sent last Friday. The work units that people have now, have not been running long enough to start showing the valids that come back. Generally we see the errors before the success results. This is due to most errors stopping the work unit within minutes of starting. Compared to a success result taking hours to run to completion. -Uplinger Thanks. That makes sense. FWIW, mine did run many hours though before erroring- 6 and 16 hours. ![]() |
||
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Linguistically "some successful type A from the first two batches" is no promising reading.
----------------------------------------Most? Few Minutes? The ps are expected to run 35-67 hours on my crawlers. Few minutes I [and most] can live with... respectively 9 and 11.75 hours going south I have a hard time with, particularly if it does when I'm no where near the machines doing shut eye. Power is very expensive here, very, so the 4 remaining I'm controlling to run 1 by 1, leaving the other cores to keep returning guaranteed valid results within the RR criteria.
WCG
----------------------------------------Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! [Edit 1 times, last edit by Sekerob at Apr 15, 2010 2:39:42 PM] |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
It sounds like we are running Beta testing using live data. Not a good thing to be doing.
|
||
|
I need a bath
Senior Cruncher USA Joined: Apr 12, 2007 Post Count: 347 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It sounds like we are running Beta testing using live data. Not a good thing to be doing. It's typical of Science though. If we knew all the answers, there would be no need to do the experiments! Errors are still data- we've just discovered one more thing that doesn't work. ![]() ![]() |
||
|
sk..
Master Cruncher http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif Joined: Mar 22, 2007 Post Count: 2324 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
In many ways this project is an entire Beta project:
It is about as intermittent as WCG Beta testing. Success and failure rates also sound similar to that of Beta tests. |
||
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 2986 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It sounds like we are running Beta testing using live data. Not a good thing to be doing. It's typical of Science though. If we knew all the answers, there would be no need to do the experiments! Errors are still data- we've just discovered one more thing that doesn't work. ![]() I agree with you - after all, we're all, in our own little ways, helping to push the boundaries of science along, and frustrating as it may be, sometimes we do need to go 2 steps forward and 1 back so as to find the proper route forward. ![]() |
||
|
wplachy
Senior Cruncher Joined: Sep 4, 2007 Post Count: 423 Status: Offline |
Add me to the list of "A" errors: 17.7 CPU hours, AMD dual core, WinXP with HCC on other core.
----------------------------------------ts05_ b149_ ps0000_ 3-- - In Progress 4/15/10 15:06:46 4/23/10 15:06:46 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 ts05_ b149_ ps0000_ 2-- - In Progress 4/15/10 14:45:55 4/23/10 14:45:55 0.00 0.0 / 0.0 ts05_ b149_ ps0000_ 1-- 612 Error 4/14/10 20:25:35 4/15/10 14:40:10 17.70 261.7 / 0.0 <---Mine ts05_ b149_ ps0000_ 0-- 612 Error 4/14/10 20:25:34 4/15/10 15:06:41 8.17 142.6 / 0.0 Initial wingman had same Result Log: <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> The system cannot write to the specified device. (0x1d) - exit code 29 (0x1d) </message> <stderr_txt> gStepsDone = 2600 wcgSteps1 = 5000 wcgCyclesDone = 4 wcgCycles = 50 pctComplete = 0.090400 wcgStepsDone = 2700 wcgSteps1 = 5000 wcgCyclesDone = 4 wcgCycles = 50 pctComplete = 0.090800 ..... wcgStepsDone = 800 wcgSteps1 = 5000 wcgCyclesDone = 18 wcgCycles = 50 pctComplete = 0.363200 Encountered error. Exiting. </stderr_txt> ]]> Edit: revised based on uplinger post
Bill P
----------------------------------------![]() [Edit 1 times, last edit by wplachy at Apr 15, 2010 6:56:22 PM] |
||
|
|
![]() |