| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: Human Proteome Folding - Phase 2
Thread: New error type? |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 62
|
|
| Author |
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 201 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
Hi Sek
----------------------------------------Here are the WU details: Result Name: no057_ 00051_ 1-- <core_client_version>6.2.28</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR:: Exit at: .\nblist.cc line:711 </stderr_txt> ]]> There are now 8 errors on this WU and, so far, 26 copies have been issued - there are still a clutch of repairs in progress, so it might work out OK eventually. John  |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I've had 11 of these over last 2 days.
----------------------------------------Result Name: no184_ 00091_ 17-- <core_client_version>6.10.56</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR:: Exit at: .\nblist.cc line:711 </stderr_txt> ]]> no184_ 00091_ 17-- 617 Error 7/4/10 08:45:50 7/4/10 14:58:21 5.13 95.2 / 0.0 EDIT: It appears that this has been happening for a month with no response from WCG to this thread.   [Edit 1 times, last edit by Dataman at Jul 4, 2010 10:22:51 PM] |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
And another one.
----------------------------------------no193_ 00093_ 15-- 617 Error 7/4/10 12:04:22 7/4/10 14:58:21 1.93 35.8 / 0.0 Result Name: no193_ 00093_ 15-- <core_client_version>6.10.56</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> Incorrect function. (0x1) - exit code 1 (0x1) </message> <stderr_txt> ERROR:: Exit at: .\nblist.cc line:711 </stderr_txt> ]]> |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Dataman,
----------------------------------------Think this one is not going away, a replacement to the 401 error except they show 90% less than the old one. My duo running HPF2/HCMD2 mix had 2 logged by BOINCTasks in the past 7 days, both going out within the minute where before it never seemed to have a 401. And then there is the Linux quad, since May 1 just churning away at whatever. No errors of the 401 type, no errors of the 711 type. Ce La Vita Dello Crunch.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks for the info, Sek. Was going to run it to the next even year but will opt out. No big deal.
----------------------------------------  |
||
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 201 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
There doesn't seem to be any clear pattern in the frequency of errors - I have seen them on 'nn', 'nm' and 'no' WU's now, with no bias and seen across a fairly constant throughput of WU's across 5 Pc's not a large percentage of errors but enough to be a distraction and waste of download time - two more failures today on 'no' units - all the same error code, of course.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Thanks for the info, Sek. Was going to run it to the next even year but will opt out. No big deal. Gone through the BOINCTasks full available history, to march 23, and only see 3 starting June 21, one of nn, no and nm each. Fortunately, with the 1 day cache setting and the frequency, there are not enough fails to kick the duo out of the R++ ratings... still receiving repair jobs to confirm... still ready to take the A types when time go into the pipe again.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
JSYKES
Senior Cruncher Joined: Apr 28, 2007 Post Count: 201 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
There are still a fair number of errors arising - I've had a couple more in the last 24 hrs but I have also had quite a large batch that have processed perfectly OK on the same PC. Where there are errors, it seems that there is then a more widespread problem that generates, on some WU's, a repair rate of 30% or more - with 8-10 errors and up to 30 instances being issued to get a quorum of valid results. It's not at the point where this is a waste of time as the downloads are quite small and have little, to no, overall effect.
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
madmac
Advanced Cruncher England Joined: Dec 4, 2005 Post Count: 104 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
I have had this message today, so can anyone help me please
---------------------------------------- |
||
|
|
Dataman
Ace Cruncher Joined: Nov 16, 2004 Post Count: 4865 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Thanks for the info, Sek. Was going to run it to the next even year but will opt out. No big deal. Gone through the BOINCTasks full available history, to march 23, and only see 3 starting June 21, one of nn, no and nm each. Fortunately, with the 1 day cache setting and the frequency, there are not enough fails to kick the duo out of the R++ ratings... still receiving repair jobs to confirm... still ready to take the A types when time go into the pipe again. There is no better researcher than you Sek! My experience is a bit higher occurence. No matter ... It is HOT here and I am just trolling for Beta's and new projects until cooler weather.  @Madmac: There is nothing you can do about the error. Live with it or live without it.  |
||
|
|
|