| Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
 |
World Community Grid Forums
Category: Completed Research
Forum: The Clean Energy Project - Phase 2 Forum
Thread: The Clean Energy Project - Phase 2 technical project details |
| No member browsing this thread |
|
Thread Status: Active Thread Type: Sticky Thread Total posts in this thread: 109
|
|
| Author |
|
|
My 2 cents worth
Cruncher Joined: Sep 12, 2008 Post Count: 19 Status: Offline |
Well I am now not getting any more WU for CEP2 as it says I have got to have 128 kbps download speed.
----------------------------------------I am sure this is a problem on your end since I have verified I have both an upload and download speed of 25 MBPS. I hope this gets fixed soon. Thanks for letting me apart of a great cause.   |
||
|
|
gb009761
Master Cruncher Scotland Joined: Apr 6, 2005 Post Count: 2986 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
My 2 cents worth, this has been documented in quite a few places - it being the <bwdown> value within the client_state.xml file.
----------------------------------------Shut down BOINC, edit that value to one greater than 128 kbps, restart BOINC, and away you go...  |
||
|
|
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher Joined: Jul 24, 2005 Post Count: 20043 Status: Offline |
Downloading multiple small files do that. Fetch a couple of HCC and it generally skips back above the 128KB (1024 Kbps).
----------------------------------------The value is supposed to not be considered when CEP2 is exclusive, but that is now a fubar control. Should get disabled if the proposed change by knreed implemented and an option override is added to the My Projects page.
WCG
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All! |
||
|
|
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech Joined: Nov 8, 2004 Post Count: 4504 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
You should be able to get around this utilizing the new option here: https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,30182
|
||
|
|
GIBA
Ace Cruncher Joined: Apr 25, 2005 Post Count: 5374 Status: Offline |
So, now let's wait for some forecast from Kevin about Windows/Mac launch...
----------------------------------------
Cheers ! GIB@
  Join BRASIL - BRAZIL@GRID team and be very happy ! http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/team/viewTeamInfo.do?teamId=DF99KT5DN1 |
||
|
|
My 2 cents worth
Cruncher Joined: Sep 12, 2008 Post Count: 19 Status: Offline |
You should be able to get around this utilizing the new option here: https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,30182 Thanks that did the trick  |
||
|
|
sk..
Master Cruncher http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif Joined: Mar 22, 2007 Post Count: 2324 Status: Offline Project Badges: 
|
.
----------------------------------------[Edit 1 times, last edit by skgiven at May 19, 2011 10:24:52 PM] |
||
|
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Since the run times of each CEP2 task varies from the previous, the chance of multiple tasks ''starting'' from zero at the same time is rather small, unless you did that through manual intervention. If you have ideas how to achieve this with a client scheduler, then propose you carry this to the developers. Its already massively complicated as it is.
--//-- |
||
|
|
johncmacalister2010@gmail.com
Veteran Cruncher Canada Joined: Nov 16, 2010 Post Count: 799 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
 Thanks for the note. I too, look forward to commercial applications flowing from the research. crunching, crunching, crunching. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core Processor with Windows 11 64 Pro (part time) |
||
|
|
Rickjb
Veteran Cruncher Australia Joined: Sep 17, 2006 Post Count: 666 Status: Offline Project Badges:
|
Query re. Credits Awarded for CEP2:
----------------------------------------Have there been changes made to the WCG system for awarding WU credit in the case of quora of 2 claims(Qo2), or is CEP2 very different to other Qo2 projects? For other Qo2 projects credit was and probably still is done by averaging the 2 credit claims, but there was/is an override system that kicks in if the 2 claims vary by a wide margin. In that case, I think that each of the 2 claims is compared to the device's historical credits/hr, and the claim made by the one that matches best is used for both, instead of using the average. Or something like that. Is that override system still being used? Or was it never applied to CEP2 because of the complexity of the 16 internal job-ettes per WU? I was browsing thru my results status pages and came across: E202466_ 457_ C.26.C22H12N2OS.00058149.4.set1d06_ 0 | 640 | Valid | 20/06/11 21:48:44 | 22/06/11 14:45:17 | 4.89 | 157.9 / 283.0 - Moi, Q9650 @ 3.97GHz (1.22V), XP-64, BOINC 6.2.19 64-bit E202466_ 457_ C.26.C22H12N2OS.00058149.4.set1d06_ 1 | 640 | Valid | 20/06/11 21:23:38 | 22/06/11 07:38:45 | 34.25 | 408.1 / 283.0 The result logs show that both WUs completed the full 16 jobs Claims of 408 vs 158 are a rather wide spread, and I would have thought the override sytem would have kicked in. My claim is about normal for the device, which gets around 35 credits awarded/hr on CEP2, 33 on FAAH. This time it got 58. Nice work if you can get it :) BTW, I thought that there was a 12-hr cutoff for CPU time. How did my wingman run to 34hrs? [Edit 2 times, last edit by Rickjb at Jun 23, 2011 3:16:00 PM] |
||
|
|
|