Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Thread Type: Sticky Thread
Total posts in this thread: 1840
Posts: 1840   Pages: 184   [ Previous Page | 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1140559 times and has 1839 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

applause
This is an extremely interesting article! Short and easy to read.

rose
Lawrence
[Aug 17, 2011 2:12:51 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

The Harvard Gazette also discusses our recent work and publication. Good press these days! Hope all this publicity translates into more crunchers for CEP and the WCG as a whole.
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2011/08...onductor-sparks-interest/
[Aug 17, 2011 7:20:27 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

Physorg.com - a science and technology news website - picked up on the Harvard Gazette article biggrin .
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-08-electrical-conductor.html
[Aug 18, 2011 1:11:35 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
yoro42
Ace Cruncher
United States
Joined: Feb 19, 2011
Post Count: 8979
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

Interesting. Thanks for bring it to my attention.
----------------------------------------

[Aug 18, 2011 4:02:29 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

... and Scientific American picked up on the Nature News article...
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm...c-semiconducting-molecule
[Aug 18, 2011 7:36:11 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

[Aug 19, 2011 5:44:08 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
svincent
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: Jan 3, 2009
Post Count: 53
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

It's great that this project is already generating useful results, but there are a couple of things in the Nature News article that bother me a bit.

Firstly, it turns out that this top-candidate molecule conducts electricity 3-4 times better than predicted. My (very) limited understanding of these QM calculations is that trade-offs have to be made between accuracy and running time, but a factor of 3 or 4 seems excessive.

Secondly (and in the same paragraph), it's stated that the models are good at ranking molecules according to their relative performance. If this is true, then the first issue above may not matter too much but what's the basis for it being true? It sounds as if only one of these molecules has been synthesized (not too surprising if it's a six-month job) so no ranking can be possible.

I'm sure there's some missing context here: hopefully someone can fill us in.
[Aug 21, 2011 11:10:30 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

Dear SVincent,

Our transport model was the classical Marcus theory hopping model, which does not take into account "coherence" or delocalization over many sites. This is what is the main source of the error in the ranking. We know this, but it is hard to get a coherent model right without doing extenseve calculations to understand, e.g. molecular dephasing.

About the synthesis, it is a very arduous task, as well as the characterization. It makes no point to use very valuable researcher resources (human-hours) to synthesize more than one in this case. It is better to explore other physical systems and also other scientific questions. This is a call from our experimentalist friends as well.

Best,
The CEP team
[Aug 22, 2011 2:40:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
svincent
Advanced Cruncher
Joined: Jan 3, 2009
Post Count: 53
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

Thanks for the quick reply.
[Aug 22, 2011 6:28:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

More great news on the publication front! The paper we submitted to 'Energy & Environmental Science' was also accepted the other day. It introduces our cheminformatics and machine learning efforts in CEP. It is also a 'perspective' article. Stay tuned - details will follow! http://www.rsc.org/publishing/journals/ee/about.asp
[Aug 22, 2011 8:01:44 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 1840   Pages: 184   [ Previous Page | 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread