Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Thread Type: Sticky Thread
Total posts in this thread: 1840
Posts: 1840   Pages: 184   [ Previous Page | 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1139601 times and has 1839 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

So the NPR report on CEP2 came a bit later than suggested, but now you can check it out here:
http://marketplace.publicradio.org/display/we...r-find-better-solar-cell/
[Sep 16, 2011 6:54:22 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Aresrin
Cruncher
Joined: Jul 31, 2007
Post Count: 1
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

I'm amazed that the clean energy project has the lowest share of computing time out of all the projects. Certainly drug and cancer research is valuable and important, but I can't imagine they would have the kind of revolutionary global impact that cheap, efficient solar cells would have.

In my mind only the only project that might compete in terms of long-term benefit to humanity would be the computing for clean water project, though even that wouldn't enhance personal empowerment the way that being able to cheaply produce one's own green energy independent of the grid would.

Oh well, I suppose that's just the utilitarian in me. As you've said, all the projects here are tremendously beneficial and worthy causes, and ultimately people should contribute to the projects that resonate best with what they feel is important.
[Sep 17, 2011 8:31:32 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3295
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

I'm amazed that the clean energy project has the lowest share of computing time out of all the projects. Certainly drug and cancer research is valuable and important, but I can't imagine they would have the kind of revolutionary global impact that cheap, efficient solar cells would have.

In my mind only the only project that might compete in terms of long-term benefit to humanity would be the computing for clean water project, though even that wouldn't enhance personal empowerment the way that being able to cheaply produce one's own green energy independent of the grid would.

Oh well, I suppose that's just the utilitarian in me. As you've said, all the projects here are tremendously beneficial and worthy causes, and ultimately people should contribute to the projects that resonate best with what they feel is important.


The problem with the low participation is because checkpoints on CEP2 can sometimes be hours apart which means if you shut down your computer it will go back the to the last checkpoint which sometimes means loss of several CPU hours.
Another problem is the disk access.CEP2 uses a lot of the HDD and thus running several CEP2 Wu's at a time seriously degrades performance.Add this to the high memory usage and the opt-in feature for CEP2 and you have a small cruncher participation.
----------------------------------------


AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Falconet at Sep 17, 2011 11:07:40 AM]
[Sep 17, 2011 11:07:02 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7664
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

I'm amazed that the clean energy project has the lowest share of computing time out of all the projects. Certainly drug and cancer research is valuable and important, but I can't imagine they would have the kind of revolutionary global impact that cheap, efficient solar cells would have.

In my mind only the only project that might compete in terms of long-term benefit to humanity would be the computing for clean water project, though even that wouldn't enhance personal empowerment the way that being able to cheaply produce one's own green energy independent of the grid would.

Oh well, I suppose that's just the utilitarian in me. As you've said, all the projects here are tremendously beneficial and worthy causes, and ultimately people should contribute to the projects that resonate best with what they feel is important.


The problem with the low participation is because checkpoints on CEP2 can sometimes be hours apart which means if you shut down your computer it will go back the to the last checkpoint which sometimes means loss of several CPU hours.
Another problem is the disk access.CEP2 uses a lot of the HDD and thus running several CEP2 Wu's at a time seriously degrades performance.Add this to the high memory usage and the opt-in feature for CEP2 and you have a small cruncher participation.


One other item would be the large 20mb+ uploads for each completed WU. If you do not have the bandwidth, these can take a long time.

Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Sep 17, 2011 2:39:30 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Falconet
Master Cruncher
Portugal
Joined: Mar 9, 2009
Post Count: 3295
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

I'm amazed that the clean energy project has the lowest share of computing time out of all the projects. Certainly drug and cancer research is valuable and important, but I can't imagine they would have the kind of revolutionary global impact that cheap, efficient solar cells would have.

In my mind only the only project that might compete in terms of long-term benefit to humanity would be the computing for clean water project, though even that wouldn't enhance personal empowerment the way that being able to cheaply produce one's own green energy independent of the grid would.

Oh well, I suppose that's just the utilitarian in me. As you've said, all the projects here are tremendously beneficial and worthy causes, and ultimately people should contribute to the projects that resonate best with what they feel is important.


The problem with the low participation is because checkpoints on CEP2 can sometimes be hours apart which means if you shut down your computer it will go back the to the last checkpoint which sometimes means loss of several CPU hours.
Another problem is the disk access.CEP2 uses a lot of the HDD and thus running several CEP2 Wu's at a time seriously degrades performance.Add this to the high memory usage and the opt-in feature for CEP2 and you have a small cruncher participation.


One other item would be the large 20mb+ uploads for each completed WU. If you do not have the bandwidth, these can take a long time.

Cheers


Yeah forgot about that one
thanks
----------------------------------------


AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF 6C/12T 3.2 GHz - 85W
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U 4C/8T 2.0 GHz - 28W
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U 8C/16T 3.0 GHz
[Sep 17, 2011 3:00:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

Frankly, I was taken aback by putting to public debate the WCG limitations from the project members owners side [so I perceived]. Think we need not rehash all the why's and patiently await when they can assign the man-power to recode things as the duration, the zero-redundancy, the changes needed to the validator etc.

WCG goes the safe route: We shall NOT knowingly impair the user, individual and equally certain not those that have large number of devices volunteered in company offices or colleges. The uphill battle to get partners such as MakeCuresHappen to contribute their fleet is huge, from security and user experience point of view. Bandwidth costs money too and when moving CEP2 on and off thousands of devices, through central external connected nodes [springs to mind a company with 25000 devices in near 200 countries and only 4 points going outside their global LAN], very major bottlenecking could occur, national and cross-ocean. So, lets not get greedy and cheese the decision makers off, small or large.

--//--

edit: strike members to avoid confusion whom talked to, replaced by 'owners.
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by Former Member at Sep 17, 2011 4:27:19 PM]
[Sep 17, 2011 3:33:39 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jul 4, 2006
Post Count: 7664
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

WCG goes the safe route: We shall NOT knowingly impair the user, individual and equally certain not those that have large number of devices volunteered in company offices or colleges. The uphill battle to get partners such as MakeCuresHappen to contribute their fleet is huge, from security and user experience point of view. Bandwidth costs money too and when moving CEP2 on and off thousands of devices, through central external connected nodes [springs to mind a company with 25000 devices in near 200 countries and only 4 points going outside their global LAN], very major bottlenecking could occur, national and cross-ocean. So, lets not get greedy and cheese the decision makers off, small or large.

--//--


Agreed

Cheers
----------------------------------------
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers*
[Sep 17, 2011 4:15:28 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

[Sep 17, 2011 5:55:19 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

[Sep 17, 2011 7:42:21 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Research Log: Updates from the Harvard Team

Clean Energy if you don't mind. Can I use some of those links on other places. I subscribe to a few other 'news' outlets, being in the power industry and all, one of them centralizes on clean energy, and specifically smart grid, power generation / distribution. If I can get them to put a plug in on one of the newsletters / daily e mails etc perhaps we can get a few more participants.
Thank you.
Aaron
[Sep 18, 2011 12:32:15 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 1840   Pages: 184   [ Previous Page | 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread