Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 73
Posts: 73   Pages: 8   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 600360 times and has 72 replies Next Thread
rilian
Veteran Cruncher
Ukraine - we rule!
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Post Count: 1454
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Help Conquer Cancer September 2011 Update

i'd like to know if that would be separate phase of project, or we will crunch till the end current tasks and that's all

would be results of CPU and GPU calculations compatible ?
----------------------------------------
[Oct 9, 2011 6:19:27 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
BladeD
Ace Cruncher
USA
Joined: Nov 17, 2004
Post Count: 28976
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Help Conquer Cancer September 2011 Update

The task still has to be programmed to run in the particular gpu. It's a lot easier to program the tasks for a cpu core then a gpu core.

Didn't you read the OP?
----------------------------------------
[Oct 9, 2011 8:31:38 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Help Conquer Cancer September 2011 Update

Yes. I was explaining to a prior poster as to why the tasks aren't made first to run on a gpu instead of a cpu or for that matter on both. It's a whole different matter of programming techniques since gpus and cpus process tasks differently.
[Oct 9, 2011 10:02:34 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sk..
Master Cruncher
http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Post Count: 2324
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Help Conquer Cancer September 2011 Update

There is almost no information about any future plans.
Would disagree with that. There has been past reference to this pending project, and others. Even in this thread you can see clear intent develop a HCC2 project, at least from the scientists.
... I don't think we need to know what new projects are coming and when... Knowing it was coming months before wouldn't have made any difference...
Perhaps for you, but some people will see this as an opportunity to plan to replace existing hardware in a way that can contribute to this project.
I think the announcement has been well received.
[Oct 10, 2011 1:28:46 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Somervillejudson@netscape.net
Veteran Cruncher
USA
Joined: May 16, 2008
Post Count: 1065
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Help Conquer Cancer September 2011 Update

Lots of high powered GPU's sitting around idle so great news and as building new machine also was going to put minimal GPU but I'd now able to produce points may go wild!
[Oct 11, 2011 3:05:44 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
cubes
World Community Grid Tech, Mapping Cancer Markers and Help Conquer Scientist
Canada
Joined: Mar 3, 2007
Post Count: 58
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Help Conquer Cancer September 2011 Update

rilian, HCC on GPU will run as an additional compute platform for the main HCC project, drawing from the same pool of work units.

The CPU and GPU results are compatible. Our chief GPU wizard, Yulia, worked hard to achieve that result. We tested the numeric accuracy of our OpenCL (GPU) implementation against the CPU version on an extensive dataset. The results show a few small-magnitude differences between CPU and GPU, but no real-world effects on crystal detection.

Christian
[Oct 12, 2011 5:54:21 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
rilian
Veteran Cruncher
Ukraine - we rule!
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Post Count: 1454
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Help Conquer Cancer September 2011 Update

Thanks, that's really cool they are compatible!

Could you also shed a light on the total number of work units on this phase ?
----------------------------------------
[Oct 12, 2011 6:35:20 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
ness1602
Cruncher
Serbia
Joined: Apr 30, 2010
Post Count: 10
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Help Conquer Cancer September 2011 Update

So, GPU computing will be similar to CPU , performance wise?
I have read that 5770 ATI is same as Core I7 single core, so i guess GPU will be one more core to crunch.
----------------------------------------
Crunch for BENCHforum team 26290 :)
[Oct 12, 2011 12:37:33 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
krakatuk
Advanced Cruncher
Germany
Joined: Oct 3, 2008
Post Count: 141
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Help Conquer Cancer September 2011 Update

ness1602, it's mentioned in the paper that it's 6 to 60 times faster in comparison to a cpu core. And they had some older GPUs there for the tests.
So I would expect it to be even more faster with some modern high-end GPUs.
----------------------------------------

[Oct 12, 2011 2:01:03 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Help Conquer Cancer September 2011 Update

In the paper there's concern over precision in GPU computing, will this mean the implementation will need a double-precision capable GPU?

I recently upgraded my 4850 to a 6870, and found that it's not supported by Milkyway@Home because it lacks double precision. However it is supported by Folding@Home, though I'd like to bring the computing power back into BOINC, while contributing to a net-good application, not wasting coal computing primes or solving chess.
[Oct 21, 2011 3:38:36 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 73   Pages: 8   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread