Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 95
Posts: 95   Pages: 10   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 772529 times and has 94 replies Next Thread
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: No close tag in scheduler reply

We used to have fair morning-afternoon symmetry. Not looking at the full day when fetching the number, it does look odd as then it implies a carry over from previous day [unlikely], or a late morning stats run, but adding up it doesn't.

As for the points, ignore the present... they're substantially inflated presently as I posted few days ago... new apps for zika+hst1, the cycle usually starting off hi and then coming down.

Something is cooked anyway, as several FAH2 which are not wingman dependent are still in PVal.

FAH2_ 000090_ avx38781_ 000010_ 0015_ 030_ 1-- 3113135 Pending Validation 7/9/16 19:41:08 7/10/16 21:20:30 13.86 / 13.99 214.7 / 0.0
FAH2_ 000094_ avx38785_ 000093_ 0014_ 027_ 0-- 3113135 Pending Validation 7/9/16 19:36:31 7/10/16 19:33:01 13.64 / 13.83 212.3 / 0.0

It's 22:07 UTC now... other sciences seem to have up-to-date validations though (maybe all those -186 errors (aka -119/-120) caused the device to be considered not trustworthy?
[Jul 10, 2016 10:12:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: No close tag in scheduler reply

Things get weirder because, not my device reliability, but the FAH2 validator took off for over a full day's production: https://secure.worldcommunitygrid.org/forums/wcg/viewthread_thread,39316
----------------------------------------
[Edit 1 times, last edit by SekeRob* at Jul 11, 2016 8:35:16 AM]
[Jul 11, 2016 8:26:26 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
3rkko
Advanced Cruncher
Finland
Joined: Aug 2, 2008
Post Count: 105
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: No close tag in scheduler reply

I managed to report results by setting "no new tasks" and adding
<max_tasks_reported>1</max_tasks_reported>
in cc_config, as Sekerob suggested.

When all work was reported I set work buffer to 0.01 days and CPU% to only use 1 core. This setting downloaded just 1 WU. Then increasing CPU% by 1 core at a time I downloaded more WUs. Now everything is back to normal.
----------------------------------------

[Jul 12, 2016 9:16:11 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
SekeRob
Master Cruncher
Joined: Jan 7, 2013
Post Count: 2741
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: No close tag in scheduler reply

Excellent... you took the SS5 route to Rome also known a Via Valeria biggrin , no project remove-add needed [as last resort].
[Jul 12, 2016 9:26:58 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
3rkko
Advanced Cruncher
Finland
Joined: Aug 2, 2008
Post Count: 105
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: No close tag in scheduler reply

To quote you Sekerob: "Any setting that ensures the smallest possible work requesting."
Forcing Boinc to only use 1 core did the trick!
----------------------------------------

[Jul 12, 2016 3:49:01 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 95   Pages: 10   [ Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread