Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go ยป
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 752
Posts: 752   Pages: 76   [ Previous Page | 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 1570524 times and has 751 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Limited workunits for Help Stop TB

As can be seen, the _0 copy errored out (with "couldn't start app: CreateProcess() failed - A required privilege is not held by the client.
Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64 Edition
I have seen this error come up quite frequently (on other projects) seemingly always with this OS. I am wondering if some person in some business is running BOINC without corporate permission. Yes, I realize just because it is an "enterprise" edition does not necessarily mean a business, it could be an individual. But nevertheless this error is occurring far too often to just be one person. Something is amiss, but I can't quite put my finger on it.
Agreed, as noted in my earlier post and even in this SCC thread. It seems a shame that nothing gets done about it, but I realise that it's probably only a small additional load on WCG servers.
[Feb 13, 2017 8:41:46 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb009761
Master Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 2982
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Limited workunits for Help Stop TB

Well, I'm hoping that I get credited for this (I can't remember if a "Too Late", where my machine produced the goods, whilst others failed to, gets credited or not - I'll be extremely dissapointed if I don't...), but the _3 copy didn't get back in time, thus the _4 copy went out - and a little later, the whole shebang went "Too Late" - due to the _4 copy erroring out.

Name OS type OS version App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time / Elapsed Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
HST1_ 008863_ 000041_ MT0006_ T400_ F00006_ S00018_ 4-- Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) 726 Error 2/13/17 22:44:08 2/13/17 23:19:25 0.00 273.0 / 0.0
HST1_ 008863_ 000041_ MT0006_ T400_ F00006_ S00018_ 3-- Microsoft Windows 8.1 Core x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) - No Reply 2/10/17 10:44:05 2/13/17 22:44:05 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
HST1_ 008863_ 000041_ MT0006_ T400_ F00006_ S00018_ 2-- Microsoft Windows 7 x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) - No Reply 1/31/17 10:44:04 2/10/17 10:44:04 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
HST1_ 008863_ 000041_ MT0006_ T400_ F00006_ S00018_ 0-- Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) 726 Error 1/31/17 10:33:43 1/31/17 10:42:54 0.00 273.8 / 0.0
HST1_ 008863_ 000041_ MT0006_ T400_ F00006_ S00018_ 1-- Microsoft Windows 7 Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) 726 Too Late 1/31/17 10:33:43 2/5/17 13:03:38 24.73 175.8 / 0.0 <--- Mine

The _4 copy errored out with the following error;
"Result Name: HST1_ 008863_ 000041_ MT0006_ T400_ F00006_ S00018_ 4--
<core_client_version>7.2.47</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
app_version download error: couldn't get input files:
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>wcgrid_hst1_gfx_7.26_windows_x86_64</file_name>
<error_code>-224 (permanent HTTP error)</error_code>
<error_message>permanent HTTP error</error_message>
</file_xfer_error>

</message>
]]>"

I'll easily be able to spot as to whether I get credited for this 24.73 hrs or not - as my HSTB totals currently stand at: 1,131,787 662 1:001:15:04:37

So, that was 2 'No Replies' and 2 'Errors" - I thought people were scrambling over themselves for these WU's... apparently not!!!!

Edit: Thankfully, my "Too Late" was included into my stats - as they're now reading: 1,133,017 663 1:002:15:48:14

Edit2: It actually looks as though the _3 copy did actually come back (albeit late 3hrs 20 mins late on a 'short deadline' WU), and thus, I think it was this that turned that copy, as well as mine, into an "Invalid" - and hence, the reason why I got some credit for the work my computer had put in.

HST1_ 008863_ 000041_ MT0006_ T400_ F00006_ S00018_ 3-- Microsoft Windows 8.1 Core x64 Edition, (06.03.9600.00) 726 Invalid 2/10/17 10:44:05 2/14/17 02:04:34 16.06 445.5 / 0.0
----------------------------------------

----------------------------------------
[Edit 4 times, last edit by gb009761 at Feb 14, 2017 9:04:13 PM]
[Feb 13, 2017 11:36:51 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
asdavid
Veteran Cruncher
FRANCE
Joined: Nov 18, 2004
Post Count: 521
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Limited workunits for Help Stop TB

I understand you are disappointed....
It is so difficult to get some tasks sad
----------------------------------------
Anne-Sophie

[Feb 14, 2017 9:35:47 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
JimWork
Cruncher
Canada
Joined: Oct 11, 2005
Post Count: 35
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Limited workunits for Help Stop TB

re: gb009761 >>So, that was 2 'No Replies' and 2 'Errors" - I thought people were scrambling over themselves for these WU's... apparently not!!!!
In my "perfect world" :-) ..... the "Please opt me in to new projects as they become available." option should be restricted for some projects and some form of eligibility qualification widget be enacted for a member to subscribe. Also, is there any monitoring of members who return excessive "Too Late" results? Maybe a threshold cold be established were such members would be dis-qualified from receiving WUs for these projects.
"
[Feb 14, 2017 7:58:56 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Gretar
Cruncher
Iceland
Joined: Dec 28, 2008
Post Count: 23
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Limited workunits for Help Stop TB

Hope we will got more workunits. I have not got any for weeks.
[Feb 17, 2017 10:50:48 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
jay_Orlando
Senior Cruncher
USA
Joined: Jan 4, 2006
Post Count: 181
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
smile Re: Limited workunits for Help Stop TB

As can be seen, the _0 copy errored out (with "couldn't start app: CreateProcess() failed - A required privilege is not held by the client.
Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64 Edition
I have seen this error come up quite frequently (on other projects) seemingly always with this OS. I am wondering if some person in some business is running BOINC without corporate permission. Yes, I realize just because it is an "enterprise" edition does not necessarily mean a business, it could be an individual. But nevertheless this error is occurring far too often to just be one person. Something is amiss, but I can't quite put my finger on it.
Agreed, as noted in my earlier post and even in this SCC thread. It seems a shame that nothing gets done about it, but I realise that it's probably only a small additional load on WCG servers.

Greetings,
Hmm. Other possibilities:
- Max number of processes reached
- Not enough free/virtual memory to start

Is there any clue in the Microsoft event logs.
Or do these causes have neglible effect?

Wish I can help,
Jay
----------------------------------------

[Feb 19, 2017 11:47:26 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Limited workunits for Help Stop TB

Hmm. Other possibilities:
- Max number of processes reached
- Not enough free/virtual memory to start

Is there any clue in the Microsoft event logs.
Or do these causes have neglible effect?

Wish I can help,
Jay
Unfortunately, we're talking about errors seen in results by unknown wingmen, crunchers who haven't taken to the forums to ask for help, so we may never know the technical reason for the errors.
[Feb 20, 2017 8:39:18 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
cjslman
Master Cruncher
Mexico
Joined: Nov 23, 2004
Post Count: 2082
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Limited workunits for Help Stop TB

I got one, I got one !!! (dancing around the computer) biggrin

CJSL

When the crunching gets tough, the tough gets crunching
----------------------------------------
I follow the Gimli philosophy: "Keep breathing. That's the key. Breathe."
Join The Cahuamos Team


[Mar 2, 2017 1:06:05 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
gb009761
Master Cruncher
Scotland
Joined: Apr 6, 2005
Post Count: 2982
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Limited workunits for Help Stop TB

One of my computers has managed to pick up TWO WU's - 1 * T300 & 1 * T001 biggrin
----------------------------------------

[Mar 2, 2017 2:23:27 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sandvika
Advanced Cruncher
United Kingdom
Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Post Count: 112
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Limited workunits for Help Stop TB

The dam has burst! I have just received 216 HST WUs of which 100 are the long running ones and 116 are the short running T000 and T001 WUs. I've just done the rough mathematics and that's about 137 days of processing whereas I needed 70 days to get to my 5 year diamond badge. Nothing will keep me on this project a moment longer than needed, so I will be keeping track of what's in PV and once my badge is in the bag I'll abort the rest for other badge hunters to get in ~40 hours from now.
----------------------------------------

[Mar 2, 2017 2:33:32 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 752   Pages: 76   [ Previous Page | 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread