Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Member(s) browsing this thread: Mike.Gibson , JohnSmythe |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3226
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12374 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So far we have reports of 2 x & 3 x previous times. Please keep them coming.
Mike |
||
|
alanb1951
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Jan 20, 2006 Post Count: 957 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I also got one of these awkward tasks -- ARP1_0034097_092 -- as part of a triplet. It took 22 hours CPU time on a Ryzen 3700X (running Linux) that usually finishes ARP1 tasks in 7.5 to 9 hours; that's indicative of a significant increase in the number of iterations per task! :-)
----------------------------------------It'll be interesting to see if these tasks need to stay on the shorter time slices to keep them running properly, or whether the time slices can be relaxed again at some future point... If the issue was "geographic" I suspect the short time slices will be here to stay... To track this over a longer period, it might be useful to have the "cell numbers" of the problem tasks (as eventually the low batch numbers won't be a clue any longer!) -- as mentioned, I've just seen 0034097, adriverhoef reported on 0033475 (also mentioned by spRocket), and Sgt.Joe reported on 0033946 -- that's three I'll set a watch for, and I'll be happy to know what the others are! As for the 32-bit versus 64-bit thing, I've just modified the daemon I have that tracks completion of ARP1 tasks so that it will report the platform as well as the software version; if I do get any [more] 32-bit tasks now, that ought to warn me about them! Cheers - Al. P.S. that Ryzen currently runs 3 ARP1, 5 MCM1, 1 HST1 (if I can get it!), 1 OPN1 and a GPU job (usually not OPNG, as I don't deliberately try to get work if it isn't offered!) -- I have one or two other things running (such as monitoring software!) and if I don't leave at least 25% of my cores free, I find the BOINC client can get seriously blocked up when ARP1 or OPN1/OPNG tasks finish, even with my best efforts to stagger task completions! [Edit - fixed a link and a typo...] [Edit 1 times, last edit by alanb1951 at Jan 5, 2022 2:44:06 AM] |
||
|
geophi
Advanced Cruncher U.S. Joined: Sep 3, 2007 Post Count: 103 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On my unstuck unit run by triplets, it took a little less than 10 hours on the 64 bit executable in Linux. That's about 3 hours more than the average time for tasks run by the 64 bit executable. That one that I earlier posted about has scrolled out of my results list so I can't retrieve the cell number.
|
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12374 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That is 3 out of only 57. Please keep them coming. I have logged them on a spreadsheet. It may be geographic because those are clustered about 33/34 000. The generations involved are currently 086 - 103 but anything from 079 - 110 will be unstuck units.
----------------------------------------Mike [Edit 1 times, last edit by Mike.Gibson at Jan 5, 2022 4:52:16 AM] |
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12374 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So that we can differentiate the unstuck units from the 6 ultra laggards, please report any of the ultras seen. They are currently in generations 066 - 076 but will soon be overtaking the still stuck unit in 079.
Thank you. Mike |
||
|
MJH333
Senior Cruncher England Joined: Apr 3, 2021 Post Count: 266 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hi Mike,
I've got 0034176_092, 0034177_094, and 0034706_090, which are all triplets. Cheers, Mark |
||
|
Former Member
Cruncher Joined: May 22, 2018 Post Count: 0 Status: Offline |
Ultra laggards may have already overtaken the stuck units if Kevin is planning on backing up the stuck units a few generations to get them moving
|
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12374 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
entity
I can identify the 6 ultras from their generation numbers and Kevin isn't doing the remaining stuck ones until next week. We have a few days to identify them. I am wondering if these 3 groups have distinct unit ranges? Mike |
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12374 Status: Recently Active Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks Mark.
Only 51 to find now. Mike |
||
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2160 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mike, if you don't have these results yet in your spreadsheet, this is copied from text on my computer screen (scrolling back
![]() * ARP1_0019736_068_0 Linux Fedora Valid 2021-12-27T07:04:16 2021-12-27T21:07:18 12.89/13.31 637.8/652.8 |
||
|
|
![]() |