Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 3318
|
![]() |
Author |
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12436 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you Al & geophi. We now have 12 unstuck units identified.
With a time step of 36 secs, the task progress advances in increments of 0.02083'. With a time step of 24 secs, the task progress advances in increments of 0.01388'. Mike |
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12436 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you, Kevin.
----------------------------------------60 stuck units have now been freed up so only 70 remain. 7 days have passed since the last full report. In that time, the last of the ultra laggards has moved on 6 generations to generation 070 and their 3 leaders have moved on 4 generations to 079 and are now alongside the oldest stuck unit. I now have 73 candidates for the 70 units still stuck. They are generation 079 x 1, 086 x 1, 089 x 4, 090 x 12, 091 x 16, 092 x 7, 093 x 8, 094 x 5, 095 x 4, 098 x 1, 099 x 10, 102 x 2 & 105 x 1. The list reduces daily but may get confused when Kevin releases the rest this week???? There are 62 units listed as extreme. 6 are the ultras, so there are 56 others, which are unstuck units 1 unstuck unit has escaped the extreme range, so 3 unstuck units have yet to be validated. The last of the accelerated (Priority) generations is 113 and their leader is 117. The current leading generation is 127. Each of those leaders has moved on 2 generations so the definition for extreme laggard is still -15 generations with accelerated remaining at -10 generations. However, the leading unstuck unit is yet to achieve that definition. 58,341 units have been validated in the last 7 days (down to 8,334.4 per day). There are now 2,282,312 units to be crunched to finish the project assuming that a full generation 182 is the last. My target for completion is now calculated as 9 October 2022. That is 8 days later than my last summary, assumes everyone works as now until the last day and reflects the decrease in work returned. It is likely that we will see the project finish before the end of 2022 due to the efforts to close up the laggards. My guess would be October 2022 assuming those university computers come back on line after their holiday. However, the step change on the unstuck units may delay that as those units are taking longer. Mike [Edit 1 times, last edit by Mike.Gibson at Jan 9, 2022 10:17:00 PM] |
||
|
Sgt.Joe
Ace Cruncher USA Joined: Jul 4, 2006 Post Count: 7697 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Just got this one today - another triplet: ARP1_0033712_094_2 Linux 3.13.0-37-generic In Progress 2022-01-08 01:41:58 UTC 2022-01-12 13:41:58 UTC Cheers Results: ARP1_0033712_094_0 Linux 2.6.32-754.31.1.el6.x86_64 In Progress 2022-01-08 01:41:56 UTC 2022-01-12 13:41:56 UTC ARP1_0033712_094_1 Linux CentOS Linux CentOS Valid 2022-01-08 01:41:23 UTC 2022-01-09 12:28:06 UTC 34.42 / 34.62 816.7 / 815.5 ARP1_0033712_094_2 Linux 3.13.0-37-generic Valid 2022-01-08 01:41:58 UTC 2022-01-09 17:39:50 UTC 38.71 / 38.87 814.2 / 815.5
Sgt. Joe
*Minnesota Crunchers* |
||
|
MJH333
Senior Cruncher England Joined: Apr 3, 2021 Post Count: 268 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mike,
Thank you for your report. Here’s another triplet: 0033554_095. I’m not sure what the time step is. How do you find out which slot a particular ARP task is in? Cheers, Mark |
||
|
geophi
Advanced Cruncher U.S. Joined: Sep 3, 2007 Post Count: 107 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You can search for the result name under the active_tasks section of client_state.xml and it has the slot number in that section. The time_step is listed in the file namelist.input in that slots directory.
----------------------------------------<active_task> <project_master_url>http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/</project_master_url> <result_name>ARP1_0013687_118_1</result_name> <active_task_state>1</active_task_state> <app_version_num>732</app_version_num> <slot>3</slot> <checkpoint_cpu_time>2886.772000</checkpoint_cpu_time> <checkpoint_elapsed_time>2888.991743</checkpoint_elapsed_time> <checkpoint_fraction_done>0.125000</checkpoint_fraction_done> <checkpoint_fraction_done_elapsed_time>2888.991743</checkpoint_fraction_done_elapsed_time> <current_cpu_time>5213.564000</current_cpu_time> <once_ran_edf>0</once_ran_edf> <swap_size>855384064.000000</swap_size> <working_set_size>749965312.000000</working_set_size> <working_set_size_smoothed>749965312.000000</working_set_size_smoothed> <page_fault_rate>0.000000</page_fault_rate> <bytes_sent>0.000000</bytes_sent> <bytes_received>0.000000</bytes_received> </active_task> [Edit 1 times, last edit by geophi at Jan 9, 2022 8:35:55 PM] |
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12436 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you Mark & geophi
There is a much simpler method to determine the time step. If you are in BOINC Manager there is a Progress column. With a time step of 36 secs, the task progress advances in increments of 0.02083'. With a time step of 24 secs, the task progress advances in increments of 0.01388'. There are only 3 decimal places displayed so with a 36 second time step, the increments are mostly 0.021 and occasionally 0.020. For 24 seconds that would be mostly 0.014 and occasionally 0.013. No need for any computer knowledge there. Mike |
||
|
MJH333
Senior Cruncher England Joined: Apr 3, 2021 Post Count: 268 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you Mike and geophi.
The timestep is 24 secs for 0033554_095. Cheers, Mark |
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12436 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It seems to be 24 secs for all the unstuck units. That means they are taking at least 50% longer to crunch.
Mike |
||
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2171 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here is another one. It's been running the 32-bit application with time_step=24 for only 20 hours, which is a lot faster than the previous one that took
----------------------------------------workunit 111089127 ARP1_0033480_103_0 Linux openSU InPrg 2022-01-10T05:19:10 2022-01-14T17:19:10 0.00/0.00 0.0/0.0 [Edit 1 times, last edit by adriverhoef at Jan 11, 2022 9:45:13 AM] |
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12436 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thank you, adriverhoef. We now have 14 unstuck units identified. The reduction in CPU time is interesting. What was your 36 sec norm?
Mike |
||
|
|
![]() |