Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 48
|
![]() |
Author |
|
erich56
Senior Cruncher Austria Joined: Feb 24, 2007 Post Count: 295 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Since Jan. 28, my machines receive a lot less tasks than before.
----------------------------------------The number of tasks has been decreasing day by day. Is this coincidence, or does anyone else make the same experience ? Here the figures: date - tasks 2022-01-31 - 139 (0:00 - 12:00 o'clock) 2022-01-30 - 419 2022-01-29 - 510 2022-01-28 - 706 [Edit 1 times, last edit by erich56 at Jan 31, 2022 12:46:26 PM] |
||
|
Grumpy Swede
Master Cruncher Svíþjóð Joined: Apr 10, 2020 Post Count: 2186 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Seems to be harder and harder to get any GPU tasks. I haven't had my GPU cruncher running since Jan 27, and back then it was easy to have a full cache all the time. Now though, when I turned it on again, it's been hours and hours, and still not any GPU tasks.
----------------------------------------Edit: And I am running with a looping batch file, asking for new work every 5 minutes. [Edit 1 times, last edit by Grumpy Swede at Jan 31, 2022 1:25:33 PM] |
||
|
Ian-n-Steve C.
Senior Cruncher United States Joined: May 15, 2020 Post Count: 180 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() |
Guess I stopped crunching on my laptop just in time. Even though I had consistent work, I decided even the 30W it used wasn’t efficient enough for the work being done.
----------------------------------------![]() EPYC 7V12 / [5] RTX A4000 EPYC 7B12 / [5] RTX 3080Ti + [2] RTX 2080Ti EPYC 7B12 / [6] RTX 3070Ti + [2] RTX 3060 [2] EPYC 7642 / [2] RTX 2080Ti |
||
|
erich56
Senior Cruncher Austria Joined: Feb 24, 2007 Post Count: 295 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The number of WUs received still decreases from day to day. Will we be at zero soon?
|
||
|
spRocket
Senior Cruncher Joined: Mar 25, 2020 Post Count: 274 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
They come and go, and dry spells happen. I'm not going to worry about it, since my CPUs have never stopped crunching.
|
||
|
SpekAal
Cruncher Nederland Joined: Apr 17, 2009 Post Count: 9 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
There is a lot of difference in points per Intel GPU
----------------------------------------OPNG_0150646_00786_0 Microsoft Windows 10 Core x64 Edition, (10.00.19043.00) Valid 2022-09-12 09:46:48 UTC 2022-09-12 11:34:37 UTC 0.04 / 0.04 58.6 / 218.2 OPNG_0150646_00786_1 Microsoft Windows 10 Core x64 Edition, (10.00.19043.00) Valid 2022-09-12 11:34:47 UTC 2022-09-12 11:42:42 UTC 0.02 / 0.03 58.6 / 204.4 opposite this date nice difference OPNG_0155176_00576_1 Microsoft Windows 10 Professional x64 Edition, (10.00.22000.00) Valid 2022-09-09 09:01:53 UTC 2022-09-10 21:22:05 UTC 0.02 / 0.02 58.6 / 1,051.9 OPNG_0155176_00576_2 Microsoft Windows 10 Core x64 Edition, (10.00.19043.00) Valid 2022-09-12 08:58:27 UTC 2022-09-12 09:13:33 UTC 0.04 / 0.05 58.6 / 1,017 [Edit 2 times, last edit by SpekAal at Sep 12, 2022 3:22:43 PM] |
||
|
alanb1951
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Jan 20, 2006 Post Count: 972 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
@SpekAal - for information:
The two tasks you've highlighted have completely different docking targets; OPNG_0150646_00786 is from one of a very large number of batches that were being worked on before the IBM->Krembil transfer, whereas OPNG_0155176_00576 is from a set of batches for a completely different (and more complex) receptor that were given priority when OPNG work was released again... OPNG and OPN1 use different docking algorithms, and the OPNG one can stop early if appropriate (whereas OPN1 just keeps iterating...) A completed OPNG task sends back information about algorithm performance as well as the results, and that can be used by the credit calculation. (OPN1 credit calculation uses the more typical CPU-time based method,) It appears that docking to the newer receptor requires a lot more effort from the GPU and this is reflected in the much higher credit scores. And it's the same for all GPUs, not just Intel ones :-) Cheers - Al. |
||
|
SpekAal
Cruncher Nederland Joined: Apr 17, 2009 Post Count: 9 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
@SpekAal - for information: Cheers - Al. Thank you for the information |
||
|
|
![]() |