Index | Recent Threads | Unanswered Threads | Who's Active | Guidelines | Search |
![]() |
World Community Grid Forums
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No member browsing this thread |
Thread Status: Active Total posts in this thread: 113
|
![]() |
Author |
|
alanb1951
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Jan 20, 2006 Post Count: 957 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mark,
Regarding that ARP1_0034173 Invalid return -- I suspect it was a system glitch on that client, as I note that wingman 1 has now validated (a day late!) In fact, this cell seems to be progressing quite well now: generation 107 reported [only "In Progress"] on 2025-01-22, generation 110 on 2025-01-26 and now this one! This matches the now typical "just over 24 hours to get from issue to validation" for Extremes -- indeed, I don't think we've seen an exception to that recently (except when a WU has [initial] errors!), although it may be that exceptions don't get reported here :-) Cheers - Al. |
||
|
MJH333
Senior Cruncher England Joined: Apr 3, 2021 Post Count: 266 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Regarding that ARP1_0034173 Invalid return -- I suspect it was a system glitch on that client, as I note that wingman 1 has now validated (a day late!) Hi Al,Thanks for spotting this! That's good news. Cheers, Mark |
||
|
alanb1951
Veteran Cruncher Joined: Jan 20, 2006 Post Count: 957 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ARP1_0034250_121_0 Ubuntu Valid 2025-02-07T06:47:48 2025-02-08T17:52:47 11.74/12.34 Cheers - Al. [Edit: last wingman validated (just before deadline)] [Edit 1 times, last edit by alanb1951 at Feb 8, 2025 10:36:18 PM] |
||
|
MJH333
Senior Cruncher England Joined: Apr 3, 2021 Post Count: 266 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Regarding that ARP1_0034173 Invalid return -- I suspect it was a system glitch on that client, as I note that wingman 1 has now validated (a day late!) Al,In fact, this cell seems to be progressing quite well now: generation 107 reported [only "In Progress"] on 2025-01-22, generation 110 on 2025-01-26 and now this one! This matches the now typical "just over 24 hours to get from issue to validation" for Extremes You are right about this cell progressing well. I picked up generation 122 at 01:48 UTC today. Also, I see that wingman 0 on the generation 120 workunit has now also validated (a day and a half late on a machine with an elapsed time for that task of 11.61 hours!). Cheers, Mark |
||
|
adriverhoef
Master Cruncher The Netherlands Joined: Apr 3, 2009 Post Count: 2160 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Here's another sighting of a validated workunit in the Extreme category with 5 or less workunits in its current generation (or in its adjacent generations).
(Output generated by ”wcgstats -frrr= 661510347”) workunit 661510347 ARP1_0033717_115_0 Linux Fedora Valid 2025-02-07T21:45:56 2025-02-08T04:54:04 6.92/6.96 607.4/577.0 Adri |
||
|
MJH333
Senior Cruncher England Joined: Apr 3, 2021 Post Count: 266 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
And generation 122 of ARP1_0034173 has now validated:
workunit 661603232 ARP1_0034173_122_0 Windows 10 Valid 2025-02-08 01:48:15 UTC 2025-02-08 14:50:11 UTC 11.39 / 11.5 505.2 / 558.5 ARP1_0034173_122_1 Windows 10 In Progress 2025-02-08 01:48:12 UTC 2025-02-09 13:48:12 UTC ARP1_0034173_122_2 Windows 11 Valid 2025-02-08 01:48:14 UTC 2025-02-08 17:31:47 UTC 13.28 / 15.65 611.9 / 558.5 Cheers, Mark |
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12373 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Generation 117 which was referred to before has now reduced to 2 (from 6).
The 82 extremes reported as missing are still missing so presumed stuck. Mike |
||
|
catchercradle
Advanced Cruncher Joined: Jan 16, 2009 Post Count: 127 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ARP1_0022056_138_0 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS [6.5.0-44-generic|libc 2.35] Pending Verification 2025-02-05 13:37:24 UTC 2025-02-06 05:24:42 UTC 8.9 / 8.91 612.3 / 0 Presuming this must be an extreme. 3 tasks so far in work unit all pending validation. Task duration a bit over 2 hours longer than my normal. I had the _2 task. |
||
|
geophi
Advanced Cruncher U.S. Joined: Sep 3, 2007 Post Count: 103 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
ARP1_0022056_138_0 Linux Ubuntu Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS [6.5.0-44-generic|libc 2.35] Pending Verification 2025-02-05 13:37:24 UTC 2025-02-06 05:24:42 UTC 8.9 / 8.91 612.3 / 0 Presuming this must be an extreme. 3 tasks so far in work unit all pending validation. Task duration a bit over 2 hours longer than my normal. I had the _2 task. Not an extreme. The first two task results did not match well enough so a third is sent after they are returned to see which one is valid. Hence the Pending Verification status for the first two. I'm assuming yours is the 3rd. The validator probably hasn't rerun on this work unit yet. Top of the extreme generations right now is 131. I think in the first post of this thread, the thread is designed to update progress on extremes with 10 or less work units in it. The first post has more information and links. There is also useful information in the links from this post, from long ago |
||
|
Mike.Gibson
Ace Cruncher England Joined: Aug 23, 2007 Post Count: 12373 Status: Offline Project Badges: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
catchercradle
As geophi said but also you posted only 27 minutes after the copy was registered for validation. That is hardly enough time to check against the 2 verifications. Check again now. Mike |
||
|
|
![]() |